Is CNN behaving duplicitously?

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by cheesypoptart, Oct 19, 2006.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. For the past twelve hours, CNN US' website has run the headline "US troops in snipers' line of fire", and claims Islamist terrorists "call for" their own PR campaign to influence the American public.
    On CNN's international edition, the headline reads "Is it time to abort Iraq mission?".

    Is it just me, or is that quite dubious? They talk about the Islamists wanting to run a PR campaign when CNN is in fact obviously showing a propaganda video. There is a PR campaign, and it's happening on CNN. Fox fans might perhaps call that "aiding and abetting the enemy".
    CNN is offering free publicity to these people at the same time as it runs an op-ed type piece on its international front page with the same agenda as the Islamists: American withdrawal.
    Differences between the US and international editions are quite common, but I get the impression that the international headline is just a preview of what the US version will display once CNN deems the American public to be ready for its message.

    I back an Iraq pull out because it's a no-win scenario, but this kind of media behaviour strikes me as manipulative. Thoughts?
  2. CNN admitted they covered up or ignored many stories they should have reported before the invasion because they wanted to have access to Iraq and Saddam....they have undermined any claim to be truthful and unbiased by their actions which is why their audience share is dropping like a balloon.....lots of stuff on the US blogs about them.
  3. Mr Happy

    Mr Happy LE Moderator

    CNN is not a good news company, I had the pleasure of sitting with one of its Asian-Indian/American producers for 8 hours on a flight one time in 2003 and we talked about story choices and so forth and it was quite clear that he was unhappy with the organisations political slant on things, its skipping events in preference to others following nothing more than the duty station/channel manager and their agenda. He also acknowledged that CNN (US) has so few intl stories UNLESS they touch on American's as to not be worth watching compared to competitors.

    But he thought Dicky Quest was a right-on chap. And I've met Questy and he's right.

    And for your amusement:

  4. CNN is certainly not the best news outlet out there mostly because of their obssesion on the negative.It's chief rival FoxNews is however IMHO even worse mainly because of it's "rosy coloured glasses" way of looking at things and it's penchant to espouse the establishment point of view at the expense of objectivity.

    That said while I don't particularly feel comfortable with the publication of these sniper tapes, I also realise that burying the truth in the sand will not make things better.I saw the feature CNN did last night and as shocking as it might be to the average American, a quick search on google will reveal even more gory stuff that goes as far as showing impact.I also understand that these videos are common occurence in MidEast satellite stations.

    In a related note the president has for the first time drawn a direct comparison between Iraq and Vietnam.,1,4935849.story?coll=chi-newsnationworld-hed&ctrack=1&cset=true

    The Tet Offensive, although a decisive military victory for the US,marked a turning point in American public opinion. A basic knowledge of war tells me, in a democracy the army is no more than the military wing of the population.Winning without public support is extremely hard,even impossible.

    That's why I wish CNN would have sat on the story instead of trying a ratings push.Shame on them.
  5. Jack Cafferty, ghastly,odious man, loves to give absolute loons free airtime, have a peek at his blog: here