I was wondering if anyone could differentiate the difference between the two. As a person who would be more interested in State Citizenship contra Federal citizenship, I am also in receipt of an IRS number that was provided by Grosvenour. I find it quite ironic post Independence and the agreements post the civil war that the federal state and by extension the federal reserve as well as the MIC that Eisenhower warned of seem to tax the individual over business in what appears to many as a direct contravention of the incepted freedom from dominion of the founding fathers and subsequent freedom from taxation from the crown as established at the Boston tea party; ironic that the federal state and reserve have replaced the dominion of the British crown. What I also find peculiarly ironic is that the very people who seem pro the federated state and reserve seem to be associated with the current political movement called 'Tea party'; am I missing something here? Some time ago I produced a 'business plan' which included certain industries categorised broadly as 'shop interests'. If such interests had been taxed under a certain IRS# then I would of course authorise such funds to be made available to the US treasury and related agents in an attempt to assist chromatic with his desires for his people. As a person opposed to credit banking and pro the moot commodity standard, deivery of such taxation to the federal reserve would be in contradiction to basic ideological beliefs. The main reason that I am writing this is as I heard a report today that Chromatic was requesting a stay until the 2nd Aug from creditors; perhaps the Shop can be of assistance. Praetorians. Obviously as a person borne outside of the USA (unlike the current Chromatic) I am not completely familiar with the US constitution and all of its implications. Alpha Sierra. Juliet Whiskey. Witness the hand.