stacker1
LE

Don’t I know it.
Facts? We don’t need no stinking facts!
I think the last time I looked it up, there were around 4000 claimant's, 60% were officers and more than 80% of CEA was for those based in the UK.
Don’t I know it.
Facts? We don’t need no stinking facts!
Interesting - I didn’t think the rank divide would be that close tbh. I wonder how many started the CEA when overseas and subsequently moved back to UK?I think the last time I looked it up, there were around 4000 claimant's, 60% were officers and more than 80% of CEA was for those based in the UK.
It was a pun dohDid yours? It’s Dotheboys Hall![]()
Some good, if dated stats here:Interesting - I didn’t think the rank divide would be that close tbh. I wonder how many started the CEA when overseas and subsequently moved back to UK?
The UK can be just as destabilising, a move from an English school to one in Scotland during an exam period could be disastrous, the systems are totally different. Then there is North Wales and Welsh Language teaching. Even in England different authorities use different exam boards.Interesting - I didn’t think the rank divide would be that close tbh. I wonder how many started the CEA when overseas and subsequently moved back to UK?
Believe me, you will see all manner of excuses on here why this can't possibly happen.Following on from this precedent, there is no valid reason why accommodation facilities for service children could not be arranged, linked to selected state schools in UK so that continuity of education might be achieved without incurring the huge fees now charged by private schools.
I expect no less.Believe me, you will see all manner of excuses on here why this can't possibly happen.
Believe me, you will see all manner of excuses on here why this can't possibly happen.
Thats one of the excuses.I think it would be relatively easy, but once you worked out the actual cost to the taxpayer per child I'd be surprised if it didn't work out more expensive than CEA.
Thats one of the excuses.
Why am I not surprised that your issues with CEA have nothing to do with saving money?
Someone used this **** excuse before
I went to effort of looking up the cost, the MOD could build 5 boarding schools for pads brats and save a fortune in a short period of time,
but of course we know its not about saying money, its about little Tarquin going to the right sort of school
It's not an excuse. It's either true or it's not. If it would be cheaper to create a government boarding system then we should do it, I'd just be surprised if it really were cheaper.
What do you mean by looking up the cost? The budget for running a school, especially if you include investment in new buildings, isn't a simple calculation.
Not for me it isn't. I don't have kids and don't intend to.
The term is "potting on" you plebeianI’m potting up some herbs this afternoon so I don’t have the time for the research....
I think it would be relatively easy, but once you worked out the actual cost to the taxpayer per child I'd be surprised if it didn't work out more expensive than CEA.
You need to remember he was probably being careful in giving away too much infoThe term is "potting on" you plebeian.
Gentlemen gardeners "pot on", nouveau freak trying to help the environment by growing my own "pot up"!
There’s no gentlemen in the RHS then! I honestly didn’t think there was a difference.The term is "potting on" you plebeian.
Gentlemen gardeners "pot on", nouveau freak trying to help the environment by growing my own "pot up"!
However, once the defence team pulls threads at the prosecution case and statistics (including the minimum of 6 weeks for CPAC to respond to case work), there may be sufficient doubt amongst the Board not to convict him.This. And when there is a genuine and exceptional reason why your spouse needs to be absent, there is a process through CEAS and JPAC to apply for dispensation. Because the quarter is a bit crap or the spouse has a better job elsewhere are not valid reasons.