Infantry Officer Redundancies

Discussion in 'Officers' started by Yorkie, Mar 2, 2005.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Anyone else think this is not being managed too well?

    The Infantry intends to sack 140 officers next June. These will be from years of birth 1960 to 1974 (why does the Army still work on years of birth, when all new contracts are based on length of service?). However, 1970 - 74 is heavily over strength, so this will be where the axe falls heaviest. Conveniently, this is also the area that offers the best financial saving (under the rules, a 1970 major made redundant will get approximately £110,000 lump sum and an immediate pension of around £10,000 per year. A 1974 major will receive a lump sum of approximately £35,000.)

    At the same time, officers on short service commissions in 1970 - 74 are being told they will not be extended (so will leave in the next few years) and those on Intermediate Regular Commissions are being told they will not be converted (so will also leave).

    On top of all that, Officers in the brackets are being encouraged to look at alternative employment just in case. I wonder how many will look and suddenly realise that life outside the Army is not so bad and will leave with their pensions regardless of redundancy?

    The Infantry produces many of the best officers in the Army, head and shoulders above the corps, yet they are facing the biggest chop. Less capable officers will remain and fill important jobs.

    So, in outline:

    Who was responsible for allowing officer manning to get in such a mess? (some years are 30% over manned!).

    Would it not be more sensible to look at officer manning as a whole, not just Infantry?

    Is this not just a badly managed knee jerk reaction in a similar vein to Options for Change - cuts from which the Army never recovered?

    Just to really cheer me up, the whole thing shifts to soldiers next year - I perish to think how many we will lose then!
  2. I'll post my thoughts tomorrow when the Infantry conversion of commision board results are published...

    ...I can tell you're intrigued, really, I can.
  3. Contentious. Very contentious.

    <Ex-Corps senior NCO leans back, lights cigarette, anticipates frothing Sappers>
  4. MS_Rep

    MS_Rep RIP

    Well for a start, the DCI was produced by DM(A) whom we all love to bits :roll: if you want confirmation of this just as MS5 :D

    Second, the redundancy board (which will select individual officers for redundancy) will be a No 4 Board (promotion and appointments Lt Cols) It will operate in reverse, to some very strict criteria set by the Deputy Mil Sec.

    So, what I mean is, this is not be an "inf only" decision making process.

    That said, as per No 4 Board, Colonel Inf MCM Div will be required to submit 3 names for every redundancy slot, so there will be inf pre-boards.

    I am in regular contact with most of the Inf desk offrs at the APC, and can assure you that they are working hard to get their initial staff work completed by the deadline set by DM(A) in the DCI(A) and the Deputy Mil Sec.
  5. MS_Rep

    MS_Rep RIP

    Come on then, they were 'clear' on 3 March :roll:

    The list of those who failed ran to 2 pages; we had 4 officers on the failures page - and they are all worth retaining imho.

    Message from Inf MCM Div to those who failed is:

    Keep applying.

    Next Board is in July with a full board in October 8)

    Advice from yr friendly helpful MS_Rep to all those still applying....>

    Get an e copy of Annex N to ACR 99, this will allow space for proper comment by yr CO and Fmn Comd.


  6. Next board July, a month after the redundancies have been announced, creating a few vacancies maybe?
  7. Another thing that crossed my mind: Isn't is agist (age-ist/age discriminatory) to select people for jobs and careers based on years of birth?
  8. MS Rep - sorry - got confused between Infantry forum and Officer Forum - the thread there is now quite long.

    IMHO it is arrse the way people are being mucked about:

    Option 1 - selected for promotion and move straight into the zone!
    Option 2 - attend ICSC(L) and not get your commission converted - potentially with only 2 years left to push.

    The advice I received from APC was to wait until selected for promotion and the conversion list is littered with BL Capts and ICSC Majors without Reg Cs!
  9. MS_Rep

    MS_Rep RIP

    Definitely. But DM(A) set the quotas by YOB, so your Redress of Complaint should be addressed to them :D :D
  10. MS_Rep

    MS_Rep RIP

    Yes I know it's a real bummer! :(

    A fruitful and caring relationship with your desk officer at the APC will help matters - some are very good indeed, some are average - its pot luck really.

    If you think you are getting a bad deal on career management buying your MS_Rep :) a beer or 2 could get him/her to look into your case on the QT.

    I'm a male MS_Rep, for the record :)
  11. Thanks MS Rep.

    Will follow your advice when current bloke moves on, nuff said!
  12. in_the_cheapseats

    in_the_cheapseats LE Moderator

    I have just had an interesting conversation with a bod out of DMA. His take on the matter is that the main slice will be the older generation specifically 64-67 but with a few places outside. No real arguement for it other than it was to make way for the younger generation. This doesn't really tie up with what I have seen published and the comments so far published.

    Is anyone better placed to comment on what is going on in the backrooms?
  13. MS_Rep

    MS_Rep RIP

    Just look at the DCI to see the numbers.

  15. Why copy someone's post? Haven't you anything to add here?