"Apologist"That's not what serious people who are anti immigration believe though that's just a parody of what they believe invented by the race hustling industry. Are there hoards of people abusing immigrants in hospitals or anywhere else , no.
Immigrants that catch a virus doesn't prove anything about immigrants except they can catch virus's. We know that already.
In the last election because Brexit was the decisive issue - and that's how you campaign effectively - as Johnson and Cummings demonstrated spectacularly.Accepted first past the post does not mean majority.
if reversing them was so popular, why has no party fought for, and won a GE on those issues?
Then we agree that stating something which is essentially factual is entirely legitimate, even if it's also distasteful.I wish no ill to anyone. I am slightly unsure what you find so unpleasant
I also see no difference between discriminating by age and religion.
A lot of people on this site are in the high risk zone. Some of them will sadly die.
lots of those on here that post xenophobic and racist comments are in that high risk zone.
the same is true across society. Society’s views will lurch if significant numbers of 60+ years olds die.
I suspect he believes they are immigrants because they were labelled as foreigners in that tweet -They're immigrants because they've got a funny name, eh?
So when you said:no, I would base it on the intent behind their use. A bit like how the law does.
You were lying. Hows the seat on the reverse-o-cycle?Quite rightly it is to be disciplined. Do you believe otherwise?
What is racism? According to you it was using offensive words, then you changed your mind and said its okay if certain people said those words, then you changed your mind again and said its the intent (Of which you are wrong about).now, do you think racism acceptable?
Those who deal with these issues in reality tend to have a far healthier outlook than our home-grown, ignorant, guilt-wracked, liberal hand-wringers who spend their lives treading on an egg-shell carpet of their own creation:
It doesn't prove anything of the sort. It's the flip side of listing suicide attackers over the past two decades to prove that immigration is wrong, and equally as fatuous.it does though. It proves anyone who hates immigrants and thinks immigrants provide no value to society is wrong.
and as someone who know doctors practicing in Britain who are insulted for not having been born here, I think oit is important to highlight the good work they are doing.
Given that it's not the Nineteenth Century, it's not something I give much thought to, however, on the grounds of bad manners, 'bastard' would not be my chosen descriptor for those who are illegitimate, regardless of colour.An illegitimate chap from Nairobi could be called a black b*stard.
Good luck with that.
You've misunderstood the purpose of the quoted words of the tweet.I suspect he believes they are immigrants because they were labelled as foreigners in that tweet -
Its a bit much to criticise someone and sneeringly suggest they dont count them as British because their names aren't Anglo saxon - when that someone is responding to a post in which hes told they aren't British.
I think you are unjustly off target here
That "wooosh" noise you just heard...Given that it's not the Nineteenth Century, it's not something I give much thought to, however, on the grounds of bad manners, 'bastard' would not be my chosen descriptor for those who are illegitimate, regardless of colour.
However, as it's your example, and as the site monomaniac on race issues and a general expert in taking offence, on what basis would you raise a race-based objection in those circumstances?
Do you know, or are you guessing the purpose of the quoted words of the tweet?
Not really. It’s not black and white.So when you said:
You were lying. Hows the seat on the reverse-o-cycle?
Also I would have thought you as a serving solider would know that intent is irrelevant, someone calling out "alright n***er" as a friendly greeting doesn't get away with it, if the black recipient is offended, (Or if someone else hearing it is offended).
Why don't you know that?
You are an officer aren't you? My assumption in based on the way you are flapping about, desperately trying to be woke but falling on your arse.
What is racism? According to you it was using offensive words, then you changed your mind and said its okay if certain people said those words, then you changed your mind again and said its the intent (Of which you are wrong about).