Increased Racism on the Site


Over half a billion pounds of aid from the UK government is already being used to help slow the spread of the virus in developing countries. This includes support for research into vaccines and tests, as well as humanitarian support for developing countries.

International Development Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan said:



The mass awareness campaign will run across TV, radio and print, social and digital media to help change people’s behaviour in countries across Africa and Asia, like Kenya, Ghana and Bangladesh. Messages will be tailored to communities in these countries to ensure they are effective.
I think it’s the same reason we send help to earthquake zones or hurricane-hit islands in the Caribbean.

I’m willing to bet some of the recipients are more deserving of aid than some in this country.
 
Mahossive Strawman... Here is a thing if you feel so strongly that RGJ's dislike of Islam is a huge problem for you start a thread about it...
I don't care if anyone dislikes Islam. I'm not here to protect any religion or religious belief. RGJ is against Muslims and people who are Muslim. Theres a big difference. See if you can work it out after you've looked up the meaning of straw man argument.
 
There is no specific law about holocaust denial (and I never said there was). Attitudes such as holocaust denial are simply covered by hate speech law:

Some obscure cases with various variations may be covered by hate speech law. The link you provided said the songs had anti Semitic lyrics not just holocaust denial.
If anyone posted that the holocaust never happened here, plod would not get involved.
 

anglo

LE
I think it’s the same reason we send help to earthquake zones or hurricane-hit islands in the Caribbean.

I’m willing to bet some of the recipients are more deserving of aid than some in this country.
Aid used correctly, to help people in deep brown stuff
 
There is no specific law about holocaust denial (and I never said there was). Attitudes such as holocaust denial are simply covered by hate speech law:

I contend that denying the holocaust was not the offence - holocaust denial formed part of her attacks on the Jewish community
In the UK I can state that the holocaust is a lie with no legal repercussions indeed HB has asserted that its massively exaggerated
Even if I say the holocaust is a lie put about by the zionazi new world order and all the Jewish elites engage in satanic paedophile rituals** In the UK I will not face sanction (indeed if I join momentum I can expect a standing ovation).

If I start sending those statements to Jewish people amongst other abuse I will face sanction - but the crime was never denying the holocaust - it was harassing someone based on faith.


** See David Icke for details
 
I don't care if anyone dislikes Islam. I'm not here to protect any religion or religious belief. RGJ is against Muslims and people who are Muslim. Theres a big difference. See if you can work it out after you've looked up the meaning of straw man argument.
Have you ever thought that you can use the ignore button instead of crying that someone has posted something that you dont like?
 
I'm not caring about anything and nor do I give one whether you criticise him or have his children. I'm on an internet discussion board having a discussion about the right to post b0llocks and, when it comes to the world of Islamic-related b0llocks, you are widely acknowledged by the rest of us to be the Yin to RGJ's Yang.
If you're not caring, why are you replying?
He posts racist bile, I hold him to account.
That's it, really. Feel free to have the last word.
 
That's your interpretation. The example of paedos is used to demonstrate the idea that we can tolerate intolerable behaviour because some people on their forum approve of that behaviour and also the principles of free speech should protect all speech. This clearly isn't the case.

We don't approve of sharing our space with paedos and in the same way we shouldn't surrender our space to bigots.
You're a funny troll weakly trying to add gravitas to your weak argument by weakly trying to define a bigot as a peado.
I think you're a BB sock and I claim my 5 groats he lso took to drawing on the peado analogy.
Bigots are not equal to law breaking peados.
Now, about socialists and communists. I hate them. Arrest me, weakling.
 
Are you bigoted against people who talk about fancying kids?
Yes I am - im like most extremely intolerant - possibly to the detriment of society

Theres no crime (however distasteful right thinking folk find it) in fancying kids - the crime is in acting upon it.

Perhaps if we were more tolerant of those who felt that way - they would be more inclined to come forward and seek help rather than act.

As it stands whilst I wouldn't be joining the mob chasing the Paedo out of town with pitchforks - but I wouldn't stop them either - Im not convinced I hold the moral high ground on that front.
 
Some obscure cases with various variations may be covered by hate speech law. The link you provided said the songs had anti Semitic lyrics not just holocaust denial.
If anyone posted that the holocaust never happened here, plod would not get involved.
The link proves that in UK hate law it is not possible to deny the Holocaust. Your original query was about who made the decisions about what the majority view should be for normal, tolerant human beings not whether the Police would arrest an Arrser for holocaust denial.

Perhaps you should do so and make it a test case?:roll:
 

Latest Threads

Top