Having been on both side of the procurement tender box, I agree with much of what you say. The amount of information required for pre-qualification, and the processes that have to be followed, is eye-watering. However, if the local school decides to engage Mr Bob Smith as a handyman to do low-value repair jobs at the school because he is local and cheap, they also have to be prepared to undertake due diligence. He would (or at least should) go through DBS checking, confirmation of insurance cover, be a competent person to undertake a variety of jobs etc etc. I've seen this on Parish councils - when its suggested that some chap in the village is employed to do what seems a relatively simple job, until it is pointed out that the liability will rest with the PC. That focusses attention. It was the same when service personnel (SP) complained about the cost of replacing a lightbulb in barracks, for example. Although there is scope for blatant overcharging, many SP are naïve about how the real world works.I think the argument goes something like "If we have a small number of larger contractors, we only have to manage and audit a limited number of suppliers. If we had every school make its own arrangements with small local contractors, how could we be sure that the small contractors weren't supporting the slave trade, sex-trafficking their employees, using suppliers of their own that we'd have to have them certify that they had vetted, that all consumables they used had fair-trade sourcing methods applied, that the small contractors were applying equal opportunity best practices, that parts and tools were certified to BS or CE standards, that all employees had been subjected to DBS checks, that risk assessments were applied to working at height, with children, in confined spaces, that PUWER regulations were followed and documented, that the contractors were compliant with Data Protection standards and regulations, that their transport fleet was properly licensed, insured and inspected."
Or something like that.
Making the Food Supply Chain more resilient would cost large amounts of money, since it would pretty much have to be rebuilt from the ground up. So that's not going to happen.
Perhaps the CEO of NHS Supply (Yes you Jin Sahota) should be asked what he’s been doing for his £200k+, being as all the supply problems were Boris’s fault...Perhaps time to nationalise the NHS supply chain?
By resilient you would have to mean longer, with more stock holdings rather than anything else.
It is a fact that the UK food supply chain, what they call from field to table, is 5 days long. Once the Japanese had computers and were doing computerbased manufacturing in the automotive industry some clever sod figured out that they did not need pallet loads of doors, wings, and front bumpers stacked up waiting for use. This was effectively dead stock that cost money and was also taking up expensive to build and maintain space. So the little buggers came up with just in time management (JIT). JIT was structured in such a way that just as the production line was getting down to the last couple of body panels another truck load full would arrive.
The system was beneficial in two ways:
1. They could utilise more factory space for production rather than using vast swathes of space for storage, and
2. They reduced capital investment in parts that just sat there waiting to be used. They now only pay for parts when they need them.
The principle of JIT spread across industry and found a home in the food supply chain. It means that Asda/Tesco/Sainsbury do not need to have vast warehouses full of baked beans and bog roll, eliminating/reducing their stock holdings and warehousing costs.
Back in the day, when I was a spotty yoof, and worked in Tesco as my saturday job, the warehouse above the store held more than the store. At a guess I would say that there was easily 3, possibly, 4 times more stashed away there. All idle cash which could also lose money for the company if stock was damaged, or spoiled. I doubt very much if the large store groups would go back to holding stock again. Nowadays the onus really falls to the individual to arrange their own stock holding for times of emergency.
Finland encourages its population to store and prepare for 72 hrs without power, water etc.
Finland is probably the best prepared nation in Europe when it comes to resilience. Your average Finn living happily on 4-5 words a day, social isolation is not an issue....
By resilient you would have to mean longer, with more stock holdings rather than anything else.
It is a fact that the UK food supply chain, what they call from field to table, is 5 days long. Once the Japanese had computers and were doing computerbased manufacturing in the automotive industry some clever sod figured out that they did not need pallet loads of doors, wings, and front bumpers stacked up waiting for use. This was effectively dead stock that cost money and was also taking up expensive to build and maintain space. So the little buggers came up with just in time management (JIT). JIT was structured in such a way that just as the production line was getting down to the last couple of body panels another truck load full would arrive.
The system was beneficial in two ways:
1. They could utilise more factory space for production rather than using vast swathes of space for storage, and
2. They reduced capital investment in parts that just sat there waiting to be used. They now only pay for parts when they need them.
The principle of JIT spread across industry and found a home in the food supply chain. It means that Asda/Tesco/Sainsbury do not need to have vast warehouses full of baked beans and bog roll, eliminating/reducing their stock holdings and warehousing costs.
Back in the day, when I was a spotty yoof, and worked in Tesco as my saturday job, the warehouse above the store held more than the store. At a guess I would say that there was easily 3, possibly, 4 times more stashed away there. All idle cash which could also lose money for the company if stock was damaged, or spoiled. I doubt very much if the large store groups would go back to holding stock again. Nowadays the onus really falls to the individual to arrange their own stock holding for times of emergency.
Exactly. The system of JEJIT works perfectly well. Right up until the point things go Mammary Glands Vertical, and the average law abiding, civilised person is trying to beat their neighbour's head into a canoe because they grabbed the last two-pack of bog roll.
But that doesn't happen very often. Pandemics on the scale of COVID tend to be a once in a generation thing, and the Big Four are not going to spend huge amounts of money storing food they almost certainly won't need and can't sell.
The 5 day issue was presented to parliament, must be around 15 years ago now, they listened politely and did nothing. I think it was even some time after that they sold off the national emergency grain holdings.
The only realistic solution for individuals is to have a holding of consumables at home and to be constantly using and topping up the holding to keep stuff within date.
Friend of mine while in the navy in the 60's on a run ashore came across a load of corned beef about 50 years old. So they cracked a can. In perfect condition. However it had been in the worlds biggest deep freeze.Agreed. I started stockpiling long-life food last year. I regularly check the dates to make sure they are still in code.
Worst case scenario, I could last at least a week and a half without resupply.
Just noticed the two live mouse traps over the top of the cheese mountain, probably redundant in this case.
Resilience does not work in a short termism capitalist society.Being truly resilient as a nation would meant no more Blairs, or Camerons. No more sofa decision making with no records kept, as opposed to properly conducted meetings with minutes kept. No more rash decision making with any form of PCDA - Plan/Do/Check/Act. No more basing decisions on assumptions, without documenting and testing those assumptions.
Your knackered trying to get into the freezer, they must weigh a ton - well not literally.
Usually smoke it (as in kippers not canabis). Bought it as out of date stock 15p a can. Usually about £1.80.Your knackered trying to get into the freezer, they must weigh a ton - well not literally.
Incidentally are you using them for home schooling, lovely shapes your creating!
It also doesn’t work terribly well with fresh food.Resilience does not work in a short termism capitalist society.