Im Cherie. Am I worth it?

#1
Link

Haven't seen this posted. Gripped my shite this morning.
 
#2
275 quid a day for a trim and blow dry, great work if you can get it. Still look on the bright side at least with this one it was only labours money being wasted and not ours.
 
#3
Quote:
"The money was paid for Mrs Blair's personal hairdresser to keep her immaculately groomed during her husband's election campaign in 2005."

It was a waste of money- she still looked like Kermit in drag.
 
#4
mistersoft said:
Link

Haven't seen this posted. Gripped my shite this morning.
Just read it in the Times, Made front page. £275 a day to keep her hair in shape, Thats quite good. I thought it would cost alot more to keep a moose looking pretty!! :lol:
 
#5
Add it to the list of abuses perpetrated by this avaricious couple and their hangers on. One asumes that eventually even the densest member of the voting population will wise up. It can be safely assumed that the Brown household don't splash out quite as much in personal grooming products........
 

Legs

ADC
Book Reviewer
#6
According to the figures, Mrs Blair's hairstyling cost £275 per day for the month leading up to the election.

HOW FCUKING MUCH? And it's not as if it even looked good. I've seen semi-illiterate, semi-trained hairdresses do better jobs and only charge £15 for it.

But a Labour spokeswoman said: "So what? Mrs Blair worked fantastically hard during the election and visited more than 50 constituencies during the campaign. "She is enormously popular with the party and, don't forget, we won the election."
Well, that's all right then - makes it all worth it! NOT!!!
 
#7
Hey IJ your not saying the wide mouthed frog looks 'pretty'? Fcuk your easily pleased then...
 
#8
Ord_Sgt said:
Hey IJ your not saying the wide mouthed frog looks 'pretty'? Fcuk your easily pleased then...
Hang on, just put my glasses back on. Fcuk, shes a dog!!!!
 
#9
nearly £8k, she could have had a t!t job and face-lift for that, then gone topless on new-labour's new yr calendar.
all proceeds to human rights abuse victims
 
#11
The more hair-styling that goes on, the more time she spends with the hair-stylist and away from us. As the Labour party is paying it costs the tax-payer nothing (unless you're a Manchester council-tax payer).

If only the press had to use fugly filters we wouldn't see her face splashed across our newspapers and the Sun.
 
#12
Quote 'I for one thought that she looked absolutely gorgeus and to me money well spent'-David Blunkett.No David their talking about Cherie not your blind dog just back from the Dog Groomers!

Bit ironical when alot of the voters they canvassed do not earn £275 aweek.
 
#13
I think dog groomer is appropriate in Cherie's case and I bet that's cheaper.

Pass me the flea powder while I trim round her arrse.

Sorry wrong end.
 
#14
So the lying arsewipes wide mouth frog of a wife gets more spent on her hair than I get for my war pension, obviously serving your country is worth less than being the wife of some jumped up lying cum bubble thats destroying the country.
 
#16
PointSevenSixTwo said:
So the lying arsewipes wide mouth frog of a wife gets more spent on her hair than I get for my war pension, obviously serving your country is worth less than being the wife of some jumped up lying cum bubble thats destroying the country.
Good point, didn't want to go down that road, would only get depressed.

Fcuk I'm depressed.
 
#17
I think you're all being rather sexist, picking on the WMF just because she's a ditchpig.

She can't help being ugly enough to send brave and grown men screaming from the room, head in hands, crying "the horror, the horror!"

You should be having a go about all the stuff she does, like the Bristol flats, the speaking tours, defending the apparently indefensible, just being married to TCB etc etc

All the above is of course, alleged as opposed to fact. Just in case she wants to reach for the courtroom ....
 
#18
Funnily enough I was thinking of her during the trailer for "When Extreme Cosmetic Surgery Goes Wrong"
 
#19
FluffyBunny said:
I think you're all being rather sexist, picking on the WMF just because she's a ditchpig.

She can't help being ugly enough to send brave and grown men screaming from the room, head in hands, crying "the horror, the horror!"

You should be having a go about all the stuff she does, like the Bristol flats, the speaking tours, defending the apparently indefensible, just being married to TCB etc etc
All the above is of course, alleged as opposed to fact. Just in case she wants to reach for the courtroom ....
It's just when she does it and you see her doing it, she's so fcuking ugly and not allegedly.
 
#20
rickshaw said:
It can be safely assumed that the Brown household don't splash out quite quote]

Don't bank on it bit of windowlene for the eye sir?
By letting this out the bag they've just shot themselves in the foot as to policital parties being funded from the public purse ...........what a fcuking ugly trout wonder if she paid her train fare back out of that.
As to the funding of the parties does that mean all regardless of size will get the same amount inc the Respect / Communist and BNP parties?
 

Similar threads

Latest Threads

Top