I'm a Celeb..

#1
Judging by the fact that the two pieces of Eye-Candy have now both been voted out of the Jungle, rendering it as pointles viewing, I can only surmise that the bulk of the voting public that watch it are Fat Munters with a "It's not my fault I'm Fat" chip on their shoulders...

article-2063940-0EDF6EA700000578-679_468x580.jpg
Emily Scott

article-2067367-0EFA1C5900000578-603_634x865.jpg
Jessica Jane-Clement
 
#4
FFS you're not supposed to watch this crap!
Here's how it works with all those dross programmes (and most other mass entertainment telly)...
You ignore the fucking stupid programme and wait until someone flags up pictures of the totty on here. Then you look at the pictures on here and there's no need for you to have wasted valuable drinking time watched the shite programme in the first place.
Here, have a beer instead. Thanks for the pictures HIAB, now someone needs to follow up on the 'Holy Grail of celebrity tits' thread and the job's a good 'un. :thumright:
 
#5

Goatman

ADC
Book Reviewer
#7
Judging by the fact that the two pieces of Eye-Candy have now both been voted out of the Jungle, rendering it as pointles viewing, I can only surmise that the bulk of the voting public that watch it are gay Stonewallers who are acting in concert in order to allow the screaming Ginger Beer from Corrie a free run at Mark the Muscle Mary from TOWIE?] View attachment 56979
Fatima Whitbread
Fixed no charge....and you had Fatima's pic wrongly captioned BTW ? ( who is Emily Scott? )
 
#8
Ever since the first series of this, I've been convinced that the people voting must be thinking they are voting to chuck celebs out, rather to keep them in. Yep, the viewing public really are that thick. After all, they are watching this shit!
 
#9
And thats just the "celebs" the audience can't quiet reach the heights of being brain dead morons.
The "celebs", presumably, are getting a decent wedge for their troubles?
 
#10
Ever since the first series of this.............. Yep, the viewing public really are that thick. After all, they are watching this shit!
Oh irony. You sound like you watch it!
 

Ravers

LE
Kit Reviewer
Book Reviewer
#11
Those pics are quite disappointing actually.

Makes both of those birds look quite average. A google image search brings up considerably more pleasing shots.

It's amazing what a load of makeup and lights can do.

I mean obviously I'd rattle the pair of them to oblivion, but I'm just saying they look better in their less natural state.
 
#12
Ever since the first series of this, I've been convinced that the people voting must be thinking they are voting to chuck celebs out, rather to keep them in. Yep, the viewing public really are that thick. After all, they are watching this shit!
The viewing public thick? No chance! After all, a few years or so ago, the best factual programme award had a series nominated called Blue Planet (you remember the one with the magnificent shot of that whale and all the work and years of filming that went into it?) and the award (as voted by the magnificent British public) went to Big Brother.
With voting like that, how can you say the viewing public are thick?
 
#13
Bit harsh there Ravers; theyve just a 6 week stint in the Jungle, not come out of Hugh Hefner's back garden.

Although, in saying that, they'd be in a bit of a state after 2 hours with Hugh and a corn-flake box of Viagra.
 
#15
I think I preferred her pre-boob job
 

Attachments

Ravers

LE
Kit Reviewer
Book Reviewer
#16
Shame about the gash tats (like I can fucking talk) otherwise that real hustle bird is fucking essence.
 
#17
I think I preferred her pre-boob job
Must agree with you there. Why do lasses feel they have to have a pair of effing Zeppelins to attract more press coverage? She's a tidy filly no doubt about it, but there's no need to go ott on the chebs IMHO.
 

Similar threads

Latest Threads

Top