human toilet is sued - NSFW

Discussion in 'The NAAFI Bar' started by maguire, Jun 23, 2013.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. maguire

    maguire LE Book Reviewer

  2. I suppose one would be OK for a semi-permanent location but with fluid warfare cat sanitation and an aiming stone are considered the way forward.
     
  3. There's no way this story's gen. No way.
     
  4. maguire

    maguire LE Book Reviewer

    are you saying it's a load of shit?
     
    • Like Like x 4
  5. I don't think you should mark it NSFW as it clearly is safe as long as the receiver is wearing safety goggles.

    It is also convenient or should that be a convenience?
     
  6. Pervos with morals, Whatever next?
     
  7. Arrser's with morals!
     
  8. No your just lying!
     
  9. ..now if this had been reported in the 'sun'..., then it truly would be true.........
     
  10. Mr_Fingerz

    Mr_Fingerz LE Book Reviewer

  11. Shouldn't it be Human Toilet Scat?
     
  12. So, if she had scoffed a plate of bacon sarnies, half a dozen pork chops and a dressed crab before crimping one off in his gob a few hours later it would be ok (probably) but taking a pee whilst the decorators are in....

    There are some fucking weirdos in this world of ours.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. Well they can't shit in my mouth when I'm standing can they.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  14. Face it - some people are simply unreasonable: or beyond reason.
     
  15. Course it's fucking not. Have you read the rest of them?