How to Police the UK

Discussion in 'The Intelligence Cell' started by Unknown_Quantity, Feb 26, 2009.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Unknown_Quantity

    Unknown_Quantity War Hero Moderator

    I’m not thinking of the big stuff here, more the little things that make up most peoples experiences of the police.

    Over the past few years there has been a constant trickle of stories about the police that result in the cries of ‘political correctness gone mad’ or ‘useless jobsworth’. In many of these stories there are examples of a target driven culture or in the cases of have-a-go-heroes and the like a culture of ‘no one enforces the law but us’.

    Now, I’ve not had many dealings with the police save for an RTC a couple of years ago, so most of my knowledge of the subject is anecdotal. It seems to me that the idea of ‘no one enforces the law but us’ is unworkable unless there are enough police to attend all incidents quickly. Not eventually, but quickly.

    As an example how would the scenario of a parent defending their bullied son by verbally threatening the mid teenage bully be seen by the police? I use this scenario because the parent in this case is someone I know. Following a complaint by the bully, the parent was taken by the police for questioning (fair one) and told not to do it again (again, fair one). The Sgt that told him this seemed unimpressed at the parents’ indifference to the warning, the statement that he’s going to carry on looking after his boy and the question of what should he do instead. The Sgt opined that the police should be called if it was happening again but why bother? Who would expect a response from the police within a few minutes to a call of ‘My boy’s being bullied by a bigger boy’?

    In my mind this mentality is the big failure of the way that our country is policed. We know that the police are not omnipresent, are fallible (ie human) and are the official enforcement of the law. However they act as they have to in order to preserve what authority they carry, thereby pretending that they are omnipresent, infallible and the only mechanism for upholding the law.

    What I’m after is what can be done to redress this? Is what we have really the best balance we can strike or is there a better way of policing the country. PCSO’s aren’t the answer and I don’t want to pay for a massive hike in council tax to pay for more plod, so what could be done?

    Finally don’t let this turn into a ‘plod are crap’ thread, or it’ll be in the hole within the hour!
  2. I could give you a long drawn out saga of what happened to me and Plod but as you say it would be in the hole within the hour. All I can say is when I required their help they didn't lift a finger but turned up like the bloody Sweeney when it all went tits up.

    Oh, the Plod are crap! (from a personal perspective)
  3. Stop paying poor people to stay poor (it doesn't take a genius to realise that if you pay people to be poor, you'll never be short of poor people and what was intended as a safety net becomes a lifestyle choice) and use the cash to pay for more coppers.

    Get rid of ACPO; what business does a private company have in managing law enforcement?

    Ditch some of the diversity people. They are to the police what political officers were to the Red Army.

    Scrap PCSOs and start paying specials.
  4. You may as well write to the Mail with further conjecture and whatever uninformed pointless guff this thread attracts. You are using this thread to expose your perceived shortfalls in a really low-level petty case close to you.
    The police are not there to cover the shortfall created by stupid people breeding - parenting to many seems to stop after the physical act. They are much like us - under remit to execute their duties in the manner directed by politicians we elected.
  5. Unknown_Quantity

    Unknown_Quantity War Hero Moderator

    Well it's always nice to have personal shortfalls identified over an anonymous website on the internet by strangers isn't it?

    I'm not sure where you have picked up the stupid people breeding bit, but nevermind, as you say it's not the job of the police to intervene in every petty event in the country and I agree completely. But would the police as an organisation say that anyone else is capable of dealing with the protagonists in a street arguement without opening themselves to danger of commiting an offense themselves? That is the basis of my query and I'm not out to have a go at plod, I know why the police acted as they did, but I also understand that there is room for improvement in every system and that this forum, while predominantly military has plenty of people knowledgable about this subject area. Seems like a reasonable place to start for asking opinions.
  6. It would help the police if this Government scrapped all the targets, binned much of the PC/Human Rights crap and allowed the Rozzer on the street to use his/her common sense and to be allowed some discretion on how they apply the law.
  7. A good starting piont would be for the police to go back to basics and remember what they are there for and do that. Reduce drastically the supervisory ranks. 'Beyond reasonable doubt' has to cease as the basis for a conviction. Has anyone ever thought how diifficult it is to provide sufficient evidence? I know it's done by scientific means in serious cases but for most unless the offender is caught in the act with a dozen witnesses availabkle to attend court many cases are non-starters.
    Then a co-ordinated approach between the police, CPS, Magistrates and prison service is needed. It's no good the police catching people unless everyone else is supportive and finally there is a cell available. This is why zero tolerence is talked about but never seems to get off the ground.
    In short, the whole legal system needs bringing into the twenty first century.
  8. This country is very much shackled by the principle of "We don't trust you to do it yourselves so we'll enforce it". Unfortunately the principle is totally unworkable.

    WRT policing, the deal goes "We'll look after you so you aren't allowed to look after yourself". Hence the whole situation where you get more strife for defending youself/others than the person doing the attacking.

    You aren't a criminal because you rob and steal, you're the product of the system failing you.

    The same is seen in many other facets of life. Health and Safety for instance. "We make it so you aren't allowed to have accidents, so if you do it must be someone else's fault".

    It's bizarre.

    Basically what we need is for people to take responsibility for and be accountable for their actions!
  9. Nationalise the Police Force.
  10. Yes, I trust Jacki Smith to maintain law and order and not abuse the power for her own ends :roll:

    Edited for getting the home secretary's name wrong :oops:
  11. Very good points there, Ace. Right on the mark.

    I don't think the commitment of the majority of Old Bill can seriously be called into question. It appears, however, that, in spite of wanting to do the job they envisaged when they joined, they very soon find themselves severely hobbled/nobbled by the system in place at present. A system that radically politicises the Old Bill and which was initiated by the inventor of "mad cow disease", Maggie Thatcher (may her rancid soul rot in hell) for her own selfish ends but which has since been perpetuated by succeeding gobments.

  12. Was just a thought Zravo_Bulu :wink:
  13. You need to play the game, if you go down the 'sort it out yourself' route then the key is to deny everything when questioned and refuse to co-operate at all with the police. If you prefer the police route then do everything by the book and claim every type of harrasment/racism/bullying and whatever else you can think off. Which route you take depends largely on the opposition you face.

    I suspect when questioned your mate admitted to talking to the teenager in question which was his first mistake.

    In a similar situation my wife and I decided to go the police route and the middle class parents of the kid in question were horrified to find the plod knocking on their door one evening, this can also work with druggies who sh*t themselves when they think plod are after their stash (yes, I live in a rough area).

    You can't have it both ways though, if your sorting it yourself be prepared to lie to plod - it may seem wrong but I suspect plod wish more people would do it as well!

  14. Now most decent people would agree that what you've said is immoral but unfortunately that might be the only two options. The police don't have the luxury of being able to use common sense and reasoning but have to stick to a very finely prescribed mandate. Again, this is what makes it seem so unreasonable to the general population. I'm sure individual Police Officers do use their discretion but I'd be willing to bet that it's frowned upon.

    The logic is that the police are totally impartial and judge all actions on their merits not the situation. Ergo, although a child is being bullied, the parents have committed a crime by threatening the bully. This seems very strange to most people but at the end of the day there is ALWAYS two sides to every story and the police cannot be seen to take them.

    So as has been mentioned above, it's definitely the decree from the Government that has the greatest effect on the policing at street level, I would think.
  15. My experience with the police, in fact 3 difference forces at the same time at one point, ranged from extremely professional to alarmingly like Hot Fuzz. In fact that was in Somerset... They don't seem to communicate to eachother very well - at times not wanting to 'tread on eachother's toes'/patch, and at other disagreeing completely with what another force is saying. It's quite stressful being the one who has to chase things. That's about the only arguement I can see for nationalisation, otherwise I think they do alright as it is, and keeping things separate spawns innovation that can be assimiliated nationally.

    I think the vast majority of policemen and women do a stellar job often in very difficult circumstances and should get considerably more pay and respect than they currently do. If I were in charge, I'd double their numbers.