How Much A mile Was That?

Discussion in 'The Intelligence Cell' started by RSupwood, Jun 10, 2005.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. How much a mile was that?

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    So just when you thought that your motoring costs might go down as you live in a rural area, only travel off peak and that the Fuel Tax and Road Tax was to go, Darling dear comes out with this:




    So prepare to be ripped off by paying even more to the government to travel our clapped out road system.

    Full article at the Telegraph:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai...0/ixportal.html
     
  2. Its a bunch of bol*ox!

    Have mentioned this in another thread but whats wrong with sorting out fuel tax. The more you use the more you pay, and no need to set up a tracking infrastructure and watch everybody doing what they do. How long before they "discover" they can track speeding etc from there as well.


    wnakers!

    OS
     
  3. I just get the feeling this is all a big scare tactic. Frighten the public with the crazy idea of pay per mile and then let that fester. Once people are so frightened about that, they will stop complaining about the criminally high fuel prices. Scrap the pay per mile idea and the public breathe a huge sigh of relief and have forgotten the fuel tax issue. More smoke and mirrors from this bunch of clowns.
     
  4. Talk about half-arsed government planning!!

    They dont have any intention to charge more for the less efficient gas guzzling cars that are on the road. That means that a nissan micra (1L) will be charged the same as a 4.6L Range Rover vogue for doing the same journey. How very odd! Not only this, but the larger an engine a car has, the larger it tends to be, hence it takes up more space on the road than a smaller car. Following that logic, if we could persuad people to drive more efficient and smaller cars, we would fit the same amount of cars (with less polution) onto the same area of road. but no, thats too simple for labour...

    Could this be because they have a vested interest in the continuning sales of petrol/diesel because a huge part of the treasuries income comes from fule taxes???

    Or am i just a cynic???

    www.telegraph.co.uk/ne...ortal.html