How long on the job?

#2
Why would you want to take longer it only cuts into sleep
 
#7
Minnesota_Viking said:
Waste of fucking time.
I see what you've done there :roll:
Aunty BEEB said:
Every time they had intercourse during the three-month study period, each couple measured the time to ejaculation with a stopwatch.
I wonder what the pay is for an official time keeper? Have to be salaried, you'd never fill your time sheet on an hourly rate.
 
#8
I only need a minute to feel satisfied, so why the fcuk do I need to get the spray??? If the bint has a problem getting off then tough titty's!
 
#9
Personally, I was impressed by their performance before the spray. Half a minute? Wow...
 
#10
hah!

i wish the was a premature ejaculation spray. too much like hard work already when i'm tired/pissed up already if you ask me!
 
#11
i believe in 8 pints of stella makes me hard all night
 
#12
For some 10 minutes in the sack may be enough, but for others intercourse lasting less than 20 minutes may be unsatisfactory.
It's a rare occasion I've ever lasted less than twenty minutes unless circumstances dictated otherwise, on a train for example.
I might not be able to repeat the feat of holding off for nine hours that I achieved in my twenties (recovered yet Anne Marie?) but less than twenty minutes? Ridiculous!
 
#13
Any more than 30 seconds is a waste of energy.

Would you really want to feel like you had just finished an ICFT just to watch a perfect impression of a foaming bulldog walk off to the kazi with hand cupped over said impression?

A birds clout after sex is indeed a frightful thing. An exploded fish spewing porridge. On top of that, if you flip em over to do the doggie doggie, you also have to watch a starfish expanding and contracting during the event.

As long as we unload, who gives a fcuk about them?
 
#14
Aunty Stella said:
Any more than 30 seconds is a waste of energy.

Would you really want to feel like you had just finished an ICFT just to watch a perfect impression of a foaming bulldog walk off to the kazi with hand cupped over said impression?

A birds clout after sex is indeed a frightful thing. An exploded fish spewing porridge. On top of that, if you flip em over to do the doggie doggie, you also have to watch a starfish expanding and contracting during the event.

As long as we unload, who gives a fcuk about them?
Not this call sign. I've got a clout like a wizard's sleeve and my arrse is the size of Brum.
 
#15
EX_STAB said:
For some 10 minutes in the sack may be enough, but for others intercourse lasting less than 20 minutes may be unsatisfactory.
It's a rare occasion I've ever lasted less than twenty minutes unless circumstances dictated otherwise, on a train for example.
I might not be able to repeat the feat of holding off for nine hours that I achieved in my twenties (recovered yet Anne Marie?) but less than twenty minutes? Ridiculous!
:glomp: :excited: :drool:
 
#16
RearWords said:
EX_STAB said:
For some 10 minutes in the sack may be enough, but for others intercourse lasting less than 20 minutes may be unsatisfactory.
It's a rare occasion I've ever lasted less than twenty minutes unless circumstances dictated otherwise, on a train for example.
I might not be able to repeat the feat of holding off for nine hours that I achieved in my twenties (recovered yet Anne Marie?) but less than twenty minutes? Ridiculous!
:glomp: :excited: :drool:
Yeah, that's the usual response! :D
 
#17
Donkey-Spanker said:
EX_STAB said:
For some 10 minutes in the sack may be enough, but for others intercourse lasting less than 20 minutes may be unsatisfactory.
It's a rare occasion I've ever lasted less than twenty minutes unless circumstances dictated otherwise, on a train for example.
I might not be able to repeat the feat of holding off for nine hours that I achieved in my twenties (recovered yet Anne Marie?) but less than twenty minutes? Ridiculous!
Pfft, that's nothing. Even into my thirties, after a decent beer intake, I was/am rock hard all night. When I fell unconscious, my ex-wife used to roll me on to my back and go for as long as she had the energy :lol:
Sounds like there's some impressive men on this site tonight. :judge: :p
 
#18
EX_STAB said:
For some 10 minutes in the sack may be enough, but for others intercourse lasting less than 20 minutes may be unsatisfactory.
It's a rare occasion I've ever lasted less than twenty minutes unless circumstances dictated otherwise, on a train for example.
I might not be able to repeat the feat of holding off for nine hours that I achieved in my twenties (recovered yet Anne Marie?) but less than twenty minutes? Ridiculous!
I'll find out tonight. Be there around 2100, better not be lying
 
#19
Aunty Stella said:
EX_STAB said:
For some 10 minutes in the sack may be enough, but for others intercourse lasting less than 20 minutes may be unsatisfactory.
It's a rare occasion I've ever lasted less than twenty minutes unless circumstances dictated otherwise, on a train for example.
I might not be able to repeat the feat of holding off for nine hours that I achieved in my twenties (recovered yet Anne Marie?) but less than twenty minutes? Ridiculous!
I'll find out tonight. Be there around 2100, better not be lying
You'd best bring a girl for me to demonstrate on. It doesn't perform for fellas!
 
#20
The Brewers Droop never worked against me if I had been drinking champagne. Embarrassing really when she saw me rock hard and she was totally screwed to the bed.
Thankfully, it was corporate hospitality/hostility that paid for the fizzy stuff or I would have had corns on the willy!
 

Similar threads

Latest Threads

Top