How do you define "Extreme Porn"?

Discussion in 'The Intelligence Cell' started by Mr_Fingerz, Aug 9, 2012.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Mr_Fingerz

    Mr_Fingerz LE Book Reviewer

  2. Mr F. do you have any websites I can research before answering your Question?.......Research Only mind!
     
  3. Some mother wanted the section inserted into the act? Did it not end up with some nasty vaginal/**** papercuts?

    Painful, certainly, though not necessarily extreme.
     
  4. Why not read the article for some?
     
  5. I've got photos of maguire in his whitey tighties. Is that porn or just vomit inducing?
     
  6. Mr_Fingerz

    Mr_Fingerz LE Book Reviewer

    In this set of circumstances, Google may well be your friend. I'd use the "In Private" feature if you don't want your spouse/partner of choice to see what you've been up to when they check your browsing history if I were you.

    I'd go with the usual suspects to begin with.
     
  7. I think the police were being a bit too ambitious trying to prosecute for ******* etc.Just steer clear of sex with animals and obvious real or simulated serious injuries caused to breasts, ass or genitals and you should be okay.
     
  8. [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. It makes Porridge Gun retch and go Oh Hell na.....
     
  10. Something you'd be uncomfortable watching with your mother? Unless she's in it, of course.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. Thrapping to fablonned grumble whilst scuba diving or bungee jumping.
     
  12. ehwhat

    ehwhat Old-Salt Book Reviewer

    Thought this was handled by the Cherie Blair and the Sheep thread?
    sheep cr.jpg
     
  13. I thought it was after the teacher ended up in the big yellow storage company.
    Bad law badly done.
    Prosecution nothing to do with the lawyer sticking it to the police
     
  14. Bad law badly administered. It is beyond farce, yet a review of the law and CPS guidelines is still being resisted.

    CPS has already excelled itself in R. v Holland, aka the "Tiger Porn” Trial.

    This was a video of somebody having sex with a tiger. Now anybody with half a brain would immediately see a problem with that, being (a) very, very unlikely (especially in Wrexham, given availabilty of sheep) and (b) North Wales Police were involved. Oh no, so off To Mold Crown Court. Sadly his original brief advised a guilty plea, which he then had to vacate when that became plain that was pretty stupid.

    Better still, the CPS had either not listened to or ignored the soundtrack before putting him at risk of a free holiday at HMG's expense, a lifetime on the sexual offenders register and throughout the whole fiasco barring him from contact with his child

    When the brief for the defence points out that at the end the "tiger" turns to the camera and says “That beats doing adverts” the CPS finally had to agree nobody could possibly be under the impression the tiger was real. However, that did not happen until the day of the trial.

    Extreme porn law on the ropes • The Register
     
  15. Anything involving skateboards.