I think you're the victim of your own prejudices and wishes there, CrappyNoMark. I don't have to "prove" anything whatsoever! It's up to the "defendant" to "prove" her or his case; which is: is there credible evidence producable to the authorties that my father sexually abused me. All the rest of the bollix about alleged "lies", "waffling", "I don't like Bugsy", "he's a big-timer and a total twät, etc, have no place in the discussion. So it's not up to me to prove my "credibility" with regard to any other issues. Now how "unfair" is that, eh?
But that's the legal system in the UK.
So, despite my constant requests that your man spackerman actually provide verifiable evidence that my father sexually abused me, he's consistenly refused to do so. On the other hand, he's definitively stated over 50 times on this thread alone that my father sexually abused me. All that was at no time, and all the many times before, ever qualified with, for instance: "in my opinion", "I think", "I believe", I reckon", or anything even approaching that, to validate it as mere conjecture, speculation or even a vague assumption. The intention was quite obviously to instill malicious defamatory statements, without any proof whatsoever.
So öppis cha' iin'r'm rächt tüur ze stähe' cho', Cholläg!
MsG