Hire Afghanistan to invade Pakistan

Should we hire Afghanistan to invade Pakistan?

  • no its much more complicated than that

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • well lets sound them out

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Allah Akbar Crusader dogs you have lost

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • This is the best Afghanistan plan I have heard

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Do they have to stop at Pakistan

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • in short yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • in short no

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
#1
Are we missing a trick here?

Given that fighting is really all the Afghans know (unlike many of our allies), that Pakistan (or ISI) is the number one R&R station for International Terror. Given that Afghanistan has long standing territorial claims to Pakistan (and India but lets not get into that) and that the Pakistan Govt. has ‘surrendered’ in Waziristan. Given that the majority of Afghans are not really that religious and regard Pakistanis as uppity puffs, combined with the fact that Taliban rent most of their Afghans at $12 a day rates, why don’t we hire the entire Nation to head south at say $30 a day with all the loot of Islamabad etc. they can lay their hands on?

They have done it before, more than once.

NATO can mind the shop and build those roads while they are gone
 
#2
AJ, you been sneaking through my briefcase?
 
#6
The other thing is that NATO could save face by claiming that the current goings on with the Brits, Canadians, Yanks etc are simply part of an extended job interview to make sure they were game enough.
 
#7
...but what if Pakistan would use its nuclear weapons?
 
#8
Bugger, just beat me to it.......

What I was about to say was - Jaguars and Hinds in Afghan AF colours for Air support, or maybe flown by willing ex-SovAF volunteers with an axe to grind.

Indian Army Gurkha MW specialists as advisers, possibly Pakistanis from certain oil rich regions who have their own axe to grind? Oh and Bangladeshis who would want some too.

Straight in , root out the whole nest of vipers, NATO , can keep the Iranians out as well as build roads, clinics and all that good stuff. Disassemble the whole mess , and build as one nation. Might I suggest the new name for this new and powerful nation be "British India"? Only a working title, but I quite like it.

Sounds like a plan.


Before the PakMil contingent on Arrse lose their minds - it's only a joke. ish
 
#9
KGB_resident said:
...but what if Pakistan would use its nuclear weapons?
So Waziristan etc becomes a nice shiney, flat piece of glass that is easy to build roads on. Huzzah!
 
#10
PartTimePongo said:
Bugger, just beat me to it.......

What I was about to say was - Jaguars and Hinds in Afghan AF colours for Air support, or maybe flown by willing ex-SovAF volunteers with an axe to grind.

Indian Army Gurkha MW specialists as advisers, possibly Pakistanis from certain oil rich regions who have their own axe to grind? Oh and Bangladeshis who would want some too.

Straight in , root out the whole nest of vipers, NATO , can keep the Iranians out as well as build roads, clinics and all that good stuff. Disassemble the whole mess , and build as one nation. Might I suggest the new name for this new and powerful nation be "British India"? Only a working title, but I quite like it.

Sounds like a plan.


Before the PakMil contingent on Arrse lose their minds - it's only a joke. ish
More importantly, what will be the rules regarding cricketers from 'British India' (working title of course) turning out for England?
 
#13
Random_Task said:
More importantly, what will be the rules regarding cricketers from 'British India' (working title of course) turning out for England?
I think they would be able to turn out for England, essential actually from a PsyOps point of view, in building a unified sense of belonging.
 
#14
More importantly, what will be the rules regarding cricketers from 'British India' (working title of course) turning out for England?
I am glad you have identified this very important and relevant point Random.

To my thinking, the opening pair and the spinners will only be allowed to play for England, and not "British India"

I hope this makes my position clearer?

With best regards
PartTimePongo
Imperial British Empire Club
Pall Mall
London
 
#15
At least there won't be any ball tampering,British ethic's fair play and all that,what?
 
#16
londonirish said:
KGB_resident said:
...but what if Pakistan would use its nuclear weapons?
cool, then we could too.....
...then some Britons of Pakistani descent could too...

Pakistan has strong enough army (it is much better that Iraqi one) and is able to win even without nuclear weapons. India would not participate namely because of nuclear weapons. So called Afghani army is rather a joke and would likely to join Pakistani army to fight against 'crusaders'.
 
#17
PartTimePongo said:
More importantly, what will be the rules regarding cricketers from 'British India' (working title of course) turning out for England?
I am glad you have identified this very important and relevant point Random.

To my thinking, the opening pair and the spinners will only be allowed to play for England, and not "British India"

I hope this makes my position clearer?

With best regards
PartTimePongo
Imperial British Empire Club
Pall Mall
London
I concur, a very fair proposition. We must remember that regardless of the peace and prosperity that will descend upon the region following the campaign, we still have the Aussies and South Africans to beat at cricket!

Have you thought of standing for chairman of selectors?
 
#18
Well if Bhutto's analysis is right, and she used to be the gaffer, then the majority of Pakistani's would at least like to get to 1947. So can these Afghans start on the madarasses (sic) and other centres of sedition and unrest?

What Madam Bhutto's views on Pakistan cricket are, I have no idea, but she looks the sort of lady to not be bashful when it comes to shouting "Who's the wa*ker in the White"
 
#19
armchair_jihad said:
Are we missing a trick here?

Given that fighting is really all the Afghans know (unlike many of our allies), that Pakistan (or ISI) is the number one R&R station for International Terror. Given that Afghanistan has long standing territorial claims to Pakistan (and India but lets not get into that) and that the Pakistan Govt. has ‘surrendered’ in Waziristan. Given that the majority of Afghans are not really that religious and regard Pakistanis as uppity puffs, combined with the fact that Taliban rent most of their Afghans at $12 a day rates, why don’t we hire the entire Nation to head south at say $30 a day with all the loot of Islamabad etc. they can lay their hands on?

They have done it before, more than once.

NATO can mind the shop and build those roads while they are gone
leave a margin in there for poor old ex-Col Tim Spicer for goodness sake
 
#20
londonirish said:
leave a margin in there for poor old ex-Col Tim Spicer for goodness sake
B*llocks! Not at his rates! We could rent Afghanistan and half of Tajikstan on what he allegedly got as a thank you for keeping your mouth shut bung - sorry contract , for Iraq!
 

New Posts

Latest Threads

Top