Hello you sack of bastards, This morning I was looking up some legal trickery pockery when I can across something that made me chuckle. The court of appeal recently made case law of someone that was born female but lives as a man who met a gilr online and feasted on her clout. When the girl sussed and parents found out dibble got a call and although our Ben Sherman clad hero / heroine said the girl consented to the sexual activity British law disagreed saying that she couldnt give consent if she wasnt in possession of the full facts. So basically they are saying it is illegal for transgender folk not to disclose they are transgender before engaging in sexual contact. In Arrse terms it goes something like this - It;s now against the law to lick cunt if you have a cunt and dont tell the cunt you're licking that you have a cunt that they think is a cock, or that you used to have a cock, or if you have a cock that they thought was a cunt, or a cock, or something. Anywho, what do you think to this? If you were plowing the stink trench of a Jennifer Aniston look-a-like would you want to know beforehand that it used to have a dickbag and work on the roads? If you were a Doris and being treated to a paid for slap up meal and the chance of an Earth shattering clout chomping would you want to know that your new beau used to be slimmer than you and probably better looking? Crack on cunts.