Hezbollah can they lose?

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by armchair_jihad, Aug 4, 2006.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Hezbollah can they lose?

    Serious posts only please, most analysts state that all Hezbollah (and their sponsor Iran) will win this conflict if Hezbollah remains operational even in a greatly reduced form.

    Given how difficult is to render such an organization extinct, can Israel do it and is it actually in their interests to do so? Would a triumphant Hezbollah and Iran allow Israel and its sponsors to galvanize world opinion and more importantly the Security Council to move against Iran and its Nuclear programme for once and for all?
     
  2. Hezbollah and Israel will both lose. They are each waging war by proxy; Hezbollah for Iran and Israel for the USA. If it all goes wrong, both countries can walk away denying everything. Its a dangerous game to play and the consequence of it escalating is very worrying indeed.
     
  3. The most amazing outcome of this war is a poor performance of IDF. Frankly speaking I expected a quick and powerfull strike, occupation of Southern Lebanon in few days. It hasn't happened yet. And it is (no matter what would happen later) at least a moral victory of Hezbollah.

    Now I come to conclusion that Israel is unable to eliminate Hezbollah even with American support (as our American friends are unable to eliminate the insurgents).
     
  4. I suspect a lot of people will view it that way
     
  5. I think it is a little more than a game. It is one the west cannot aford to loose.

    I see alot of similarities to the 1930s that if the west had taken firm action aginst Hitler earlier ( the French took no action when Germany entered the Rhineland) history may have been different.

    Its the same with militent Islam we have to face it that it has to be confronted and stopped and they only understand strength not weakness.

    So yes Hezbollah must be defeated.
     
  6. Can Hezbollah lose, of course they can, particularly if their backers see them as being of no further value. Can Israel win, that is a far more difficult one, because if Hezbollah is put out of action for good there will be a vacumn for those who have been further alienated against the Iraeli. Whatever happens I think one can be reasonably sure that Israel has ensured trouble on it's northern border for years to come, unless they can kill all those under 21 before the ceasefire.
     
  7. Israel has been being very restrained -- have they wanted to, they could have performed their quick and powerful strike and occupation within hours. I would imagine that they didn't see it in their interest to do this from the outset.
     
  8. Also, but far less likely, if the Lebanese majority wish to carry out action to deter Hezb in whatever state they are left in after the hostilities. There is already talk (at least as far as Hezb goes) of settling scores after the dust has settled.

    Hezb military strength may deter the Lebanese from doing this.

    Israel never completely wins any war, hence continued fighting through the last 6 decades. The fighting just goes through transitions / phases of war / conflict.

    The (security) vacuum will hopefully be filled by a multi-national force. Also, the Christian (part) in the south is dis-interested in conflict. Hezb initial raison d'etre was to dislodge Israel from S.Lebanon and they managed to grow (with strong funding) and stick around after 'their job was done'. Once Israel withdraws from the south during this current incursion, there will be no justified reason to hit it's northern border (other then in 'solidarity with their Pals brothers' - this being the original excuse for the action carried out by Hezb 20+ days ago).

    Unfortunately, whatever the case, trouble is never far from Israel's borders
     
  9. Hezbollah can't lose, but they cannot win either. The whole conflict is one in which there are few outcomes for peace. Given that there isn't a hope in hell's chance that there can be a lasting political sdolution between Israel and Hezbollah, the only real alternative is to cut off the supply of weopons to Hezbollah- another almost impossible task.
    Israel has been at war for over 2000 years ( check your Bibles) and it would seem to be their destiny to continue to be at war forever.
     
  10. Who were the jewish nation (albeit a wandering nation) at war with in the 1200s Pike??? Or during the 100 years war?????, the English Civil war???? After they lost their nation they became a downtrodden and subjugated people and whilst individuals fought back most accepted their lot
     
  11. Quite correct Sven. Sorry should have been clearer in my post that during the history of the Israeli people they have been at war more often than not with their often hostile neighbours.

    Why would they become involved in the English Civil War?
     
  12. Nehustan

    Nehustan On ROPs

    They may well have been involved is some way as I recall Cromwell enacted pro Jewish legislation, of course it may have well just been one law enacted amongst many from an ideological basis rather than action driven.

    (***edit*** actually wiki says he wanted their cash and trade resources)
     
  13. I think one of the main points as regards the Lebanese majority, is after several weeks of being terrorise from the air and in some cases the ground by the Israelis how big is the anti Hezbollah majority. Whilst the Israelis talk about war against Hezbollah they actually wage war against the Lebanese people, quite deliberately to terrise them into turning against Hezbollah, and as we know such activities often backfire.

    The wars that have not ended are in that state because Irael believes it can win by military action alone, and I suspect that many don't want then to end, because ending them will mean an end to the Zionist concept of a greater Israel encompasing all the Palestinian lands and probably more as well.

    Security will never be achieved without a political settlement, and even if Hezbollah disapears it will be replaced, unless real political progress is made, and the present action in South Lebanon has I suspect put that back 10 years as they have created thousands of new Jihadis.

    I suspect the blame for trouble never being far from Israels borders has as much to do with Israels treatment of it's neigbhors as it has to do with Islamic fundamentalism which has fed on Israeli brutality and terrorism.
     
  14. Very good article by Feargal Keane of the BBC in The Spectator. As someone with small children the first two paragraphs make you stop and think and read the rest of it more closely. He's always been a great reporter and I often think he'd make a superb writer rather than broadcaster. Sorry about length, but Speccy content is sometimes p/w protected

    ‘See dogs eating bodies in the rubble’
    Fergal Keane
    Qana
    There was no smell of death. The dying had taken place too recently. When I arrived they were still pulling corpses from the collapsed building. The first I saw were two young brothers of the Shalhoub family. If you have ever watched sleeping children carried to their beds late at night, you will have some idea of the scene. The dead children of Qana looked as if they were in a deep slumber. The shock waves of the explosion had collapsed their lungs, suffocating them in the rubble. I saw one whose mouth and nose were stuffed with sand. The only sign of the violence done to them was a trickle of blood from the noses of a few and several dark bruises where masonry had crashed on to their flesh. I counted five child corpses being carried out in just ten minutes.
    A Red Cross man laid a blanket on the ground. Two of his colleagues cradled the corpses of the dead Shalhoub boys and then knelt and laid them down. They did this with great gentleness. Then each worker took a corner of the blanket and lifted the bundle. In this way the children were carried down the lane past the drying tobacco plants and the olive groves and fields where they had once played. When they had been loaded into the ambulances they were driven through the ruined town to the government hospital in Tyre. Here they were wrapped in polythene bags and placed in a refrigerated lorry with all the other new corpses of the war.
    Within hours of the bombing Hezbollah was vowing revenge on Israel and inciting its supporters to even more hatred of the Jewish state (if that were possible). At a mass funeral for other war victims I heard a mullah tell some journalists that the civilian dead were ‘martyrs’. When I challenged him on Hezbollah’s responsibility for starting this latest war, he gave me a lecture on the history of the region. I felt as if I were back in Belfast being harangued by a Provo or a Loyalist. It reminded me of what my friend the poet Paul Durcan calls ‘the politics of the last atrocity/ the atrocity of the last politics’.
    The Israelis went into their default mode of response. It was a ‘regrettable’ incident but all the other side’s fault for firing rockets from civilian areas. No blame here. In the immediate aftermath one Israeli official went so far as to suggest on Irish radio that explosives might have been stored in or near the house by Hezbollah. There wasn’t any evidence for this suggestion, but I can only guess it was meant to muddy the waters at a time when Jerusalem was under massive pressure.
    Internet conspiracy theorists quickly followed up by suggesting that the state of the rubble did not indicate an air strike but rather a blast created by Hezbollah. Others posited that the condition of the corpses — some had rigor mortis — meant the bodies had been dead for longer than the time since the explosion had taken place. In other words it was all a giant Hezbollah hoax. The best word we have on all of this comes from the Israeli Defence Force, which has acknowledged the fact of the bombing. That should silence the conspiracy theories.
    Given my experience of the last few weeks in south Lebanon, here is what I think may have happened. Hezbollah were firing rockets from around Qana and from near the village of Hosh down the road closer to Tyre. This had been happening throughout the conflict. The Israelis responded with air strikes. In my BBC reports I have pointed out that Hezbollah rocket attacks invariably produce a heavy Israeli response.
    Why did the pilot target this particular house? I don’t know. What can be said is that the overall level of civilian casualties indicates that the air campaign is being fought with nothing like the precision and carefulness that Israel has claimed. Certainly the civilians I have spoken to who have been attacked in their vehicle convoys — and there have been many — would find it impossible to accept such an assertion.
    I have been reporting what I have seen and heard on the Lebanese part of the battlefield. The suffering of Israeli families and the terrible fear of living with the threat from Hezbollah has been carefully documented by my BBC colleagues south of the border. Hezbollah rains rockets down without any care for precision. They may hit a field or kill a child. It is only through the inaccuracy of their Katyusha rockets and the limited power of Hezbollah’s arsenal that Israel’s civilian death toll has been so much lower than that of the Lebanese. Be under no illusion, Hezbollah would be wilfully killing far more civilians if it could.
    Qana has not ended the war. Not yet, at any rate. It has merely increased pressure on Israel to expedite its campaign. Hence the accelerated ground operation. But it has also helped give Hezbollah one of the prizes it sought when it launched this war: a Lebanese people united in fierce opposition to Israel. Travelling through border villages last week, I saw the devastation wreaked on the civilian population and found Christians as well as Shia Muslims who raged against Israel.
    ‘We are good people. What have we done to them?’ one Maronite woman asked as we both cowered under Israeli shelling in the largely Christian village of Rmeich. A few minutes earlier I had descended into the basement of the church of St George to find several hundred terrified and hungry refugees. Many Christians do not like or trust Hezbollah but they are furious at being driven from their homes and at the huge cost in civilian lives. When you are being shelled in your village and then again as you try to flee, you are not inclined to go back along the chain of responsibility and blame Sheikh Nasrallah for ordering the original attack.
    The bad news for Mr Bush and Mr Blair is that the people of the ruined villages rail against them too. There was bitter ironic laughter when the American ambassador appeared on television donating humanitarian aid for the refugees. It did not escape the notice of the Lebanese that at the very same time the Americans were sending, via Britain, fresh supplies of bombs to be dropped on them by Israel.
    No phrase in recent memory has caused so much offence in Lebanon as Condi Rice’s ‘new Middle East’. I have had it thrown in my face by elderly refugees trudging around the massive craters in the roads that lead from the town of Bint Jebiel, a place bombed into the stone age during fighting between the Israelis and Hezbollah.
    ‘Let them look at the dogs eating bodies in the rubble,’ one man in Qana screamed at me. This war has been bad for almost everybody. It has been disastrous for the Lebanese civilians because it is they who have suffered most; but awful too for the innocent civilians in Israel deliberately cut down by Hezbollah and for others forced to leave the northern region. Three weeks into this war, the Israeli government is wondering how it can get out of the Lebanese mire and still protect its people from the rockets of Hezbollah. And it has been bad for Britain and America, whose support for Israel’s bombing campaign has alienated one of the most pro-Western governments in the region. Who has benefited? Hezbollah may have been militarily weakened but politically it could reap huge benefits from the anger of the population. There will be pleasure, too, in Tehran and Damascus. Both have interfered and manipulated in Lebanon for years to suit their own political and ideological interests. These two regimes under pressure from the international community will revel in the damage inflicted on Israel and America if this war ends without the decisive defeat of Hezbollah promised by Jerusalem. Right now, that defeat looks a very distant prospect.
    Fergal Keane reported from south Lebanon for BBC News
     
  15. I spent my formative years in S.Beirut and got to know a lot of Hezb pretty well.

    They will be no more defeated than we were able to 'defeat' the IRA.

    And they are just as smart and slick as Sinn Fein ever were.

    IMO Israel erred in giving advance warning of their intent to hit S.Beirut in the initial phase of the campaign.

    If they had managed to take out Nasrallah and some senior Hezbollah figures at the start they could have claimed more success but it looks very much like they shot first and thought about it later. Olmert's inexperience has shown through in that regard.

    Ultimately it comes down to perception...victory as perceived as by Israel is viewed as a draw by the other side and as long as that state of affairs continues things will remain this way in the Mid-East for the foreseeable future.