Army Rumour Service

Register a free account today to join our community
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site, connect with other members through your own private inbox and will receive smaller adverts!

HCR Officers hounded out of house by "Muslims"

So Integration is not working. We know.

The problem is what to do about it. Can we just ship out all the undesirables who do not want to be british in an old rust bucket?









Liberalism is responsible for this mess.
 
Skinn_Full said:
I think its fu*cking disgusting ,a British soldier, can't display with pride his uniform in Great Britain?

It's no different from the 80's and early 90's we couldnt wear uniform 'cos of the threat from IRA and/or IRA sympathisers


so no change there then!!
 
Crab_Cadet said:
Liberalism is responsible for this mess.

What?

Next you'll be saying fascism is the solution :roll:

I cant stand people who just label people or issues 'liberal', its complete bollox, you cant just simplify things down like that especially not complicated socio-economic issues. If you actually have an argument for why, in this case 'Liberalism' (which you’ll need to expand your precise meaning there of as well) is at fault, id be most interested to hear it.
 
Drago_Drake said:
Crab_Cadet said:
Liberalism is responsible for this mess.

What?

Next you'll be saying facism is the answer :roll:

By liberals allowing such acts to go un punished and the continued threat of the PC lobby hanging over us all. Thats how

Facism is not the way forward, in fact it should never be considered to sort these sort of problems out.
 
By liberals allowing such acts to go un punished and the continued threat of the PC lobby hanging over us all. Thats how

Why do people refer to this mysterious "PC lobby" like it's the illuminati?

What "PC lobby"? Seriously , what PC lobby is this? Where do acts of violence go unpunished in the UK if the instigators are caught?

Go and think about what it is you are trying to say , or what reasons you are trying to find for wanton, inexcusable criminal violence.

Is 'Liberalism and the PC lobby" responsible for the attack on the Diary as well?

Or the ex? - BNP bloke being lifted with rather a lot of chemicals, and alleged malice aforethought?
 
Check firing !!

three nights of violence in windsor

I really think we need to place this sort of thing in the context of an attack on a Muslim dairy and several nights of unrest in Windsor.

If "tim nice but dim" is going to be allowed to live off camp, then surely he should be exepected to live at home with mater and pater? I hope the Adjutant has had a quiet word. << If one of them was the Adjt, then he should report to the QM>>

When a powerful white, anglo-saxon Protestant male in our government, has this week started to dictate what Muslim women should and should not do, I am not surprised.

If you think it's bad in Windsor, just pause to consider it's going to be a lot worse down in the ghetoes of West Staines
Ali_G-01Law.jpg
 
the_guru said:
http://tinyurl.com/edvjz
Apologies that it is the Scum and there will obviously be a bit of sensationalism, but I wonder how hard the police are trying to find the culprits.

This is amazing

The Scum doesn't name the "four young household cavalry officers"

Or the Source which names the culprits as muslim

Or the source in barracks which "confirmed" that the four had threatening phone calls from muslims"

Why don't You ask Yourselves a couple of questions

*How did the muslims get the heads up that the officers were looking at the house - or planning to rent this one - there are only 500 muslims in Windsor???? (sourced from the article on the article linked to on another thread from the Windsor local newspaper)
*How did the source of the telephone bother know the callers were muslim - muslim youth usually were born and grew up in this country and sound like they do.
*Why did the police officer say that the racial angle was only one of several they were looking at - if there were witnesses to say it was muslims then he would have discounted all other reasons.
Basically the Scum lies like the proverbial naafi watch and cannot trusted to report anything straight. I take this with a large pich of salt until its allegations are repeated by a more trustworthy source
 
Sven said:
the_guru said:
http://tinyurl.com/edvjz
Apologies that it is the Scum and there will obviously be a bit of sensationalism, but I wonder how hard the police are trying to find the culprits.

This is amazing

The Scum doesn't name the "four young household cavalry officers"

Or the Source which names the culprits as muslim

Or the source in barracks which "confirmed" that the four had threatening phone calls from muslims"

Why don't You ask Yourselves a couple of questions

*How did the muslims get the heads up that the officers were looking at the house - or planning to rent this one - there are only 500 muslims in Windsor???? (sourced from the article on the article linked to on another thread from the Windsor local newspaper)
*How did the source of the telephone bother know the callers were muslim - muslim youth usually were born and grew up in this country and sound like they do.
*Why did the police officer say that the racial angle was only one of several they were looking at - if there were witnesses to say it was muslims then he would have discounted all other reasons.
Basically the Scum lies like the proverbial naafi watch and cannot trusted to report anything straight. I take this with a large pich of salt until its allegations are repeated by a more trustworthy source

Exactly. As Ive said too in my previous posts.
 
"Muslim copper refuses to stag on" headline on the same day the "we've only got 200 prison places left" is buried as deep as a deep buried thing.

"Muslims attack our boy's gaff" story , so let's look for the next buried story and........ Ta-Daaaaaaaaaaaa

Crisis as terrorist trials hit log jam

RADICAL reforms to speed up terrorist trials are being considered in an attempt to free up a worsening legal log jam, The Times has learnt.

The move comes as the case of six men accused of taking part in the failed bomb attempts in London on July 21, 2005, was adjourned yesterday until next year. There are now a record 90 terror suspects awaiting trial in Britain’s severely overcrowded prisons.

The trial of the July 21 suspects, which was scheduled to begin this month, has been postponed until January 11 — 18 months after the events that concern it took place. The defendants deny all charges. Strict court orders prevent publication of the reasons for the delay.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2392704,00.html


Which is the more serious, and relevant story?
 
Where do acts of violence go unpunished in the UK if the instigators are caught?

Well, provided we don't split hairs on the precise definition of 'unpunished', almost everywhere mate: Hansard gives an average time served for murder (not manslaughter, but full on murder) over the period 92 to 96, of 14 years...

(link here: average murder time served)

Assault occasioning Actual Bodily Harm: average sentence length - 8 months (link here: ABH sentencing) - so the time served for ABH is probably about 5 months with remission/parole, etc etc. Without getting into the whole Muslim thing, it does appear that violence (remembering that Hansard also gives a crime detection/prosecution rate of about 23%), is an underpunished activity: there's less than a 1 in 3 chance of being caught, and when you are, anything short of manslaughter is very unlikely to see you jailed for more than a year. And these are the figures the government is happy to publish...
 
Crab_Cadet said:
Liberalism is responsible for this mess.

This isn't a 'Liberal' state, under 'Liberalism' - which you blame, would only provide; A. Police Force for internal protection from the Individuals against each other and the state. B. An Armed Force for external protection from other states or aggressors outwith the state.

Our Liberal Socialist Democracy isn't to blame for 'this' either. Come back when you have a clue.
 
PTP-the question "where do instigators of violence go un-punished if caught" is laughable. Are you living on the same planet at this moment in time? Of course, we can split hairs about what equates to punishment, but come on.
Oh, and if a couple of HCR officers were to attempt to move in to my street, I would probably want them moved on soonest....Chavs with a posh accent is all they are!! Turning up in uniform in a L/R- I do hope the driver opened the door!
 
Northern Monkey said:
PTP-the question "where do instigators of violence go un-punished if caught" is laughable. Are you living on the same planet at this moment in time? Of course, we can split hairs about what equates to punishment, but come on.
Oh, and if a couple of HCR officers were to attempt to move in to my street, I would probably want them moved on soonest....Chavs with a posh accent is all they are!! Turning up in uniform in a L/R- I do hope the driver opened the door!

So You would throw away the key for such petty vandalism would You???? And for all such petty offences?????

Hmmmmm

3 months Colly for drunk and disorderly perhaps. Three months and out for GBH, six months and out for ABH???

Christ, we'd lose half of the Infantry You had Your way
 
Sven, you mong, I was replying to PTP's post, not stating a position on sentencing per se. Read things in context then respond. Should these individual's be locked up-it depends on their motivation and history.
 

New posts

Top