Hazel Blears - Whats the Point?

Discussion in 'The Intelligence Cell' started by jack-daniels, May 23, 2008.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. An MP

  2. A Glove Puppet

  3. Figure 11

  4. A Midget Porn Actress

  1. Having watched Question Time last night I wondered what this woman is actually good for, all she did was say 'in the last ten years', she was like a stuck record. Typical MP sticking up for what she personally believed in and not what the entire audience believed.
    Anyhow she must have some use, anyone know any. Politics aside, this is one woman that I would willingly suffocate.

    Attached Files:

  2. I almost chose Glove Puppet - but that's what she is and she's not even convincing as that. Fig 11 it is then!
  3. in_the_cheapseats

    in_the_cheapseats LE Moderator

    Glove puppet suggests she might get some personal pleasure out of it therefore fig 11 it must be.

    She is useless and her arguments simply don't change in the face of reality.
  4. She is nothing more than a smirking, brainwashed clown that typifies the Neu Arbeit regime and its coterie of nodding ' we know best' sycophants. The sky is green and snow is red. Blah blah Blears. Fcuk off now sweetie and put the kettle on whilst you're about it.

    My choice? Clue: In your own time, go on!
  5. Surely she is a Fig 12 given the dwarfishness of the thing....

    He boss, former or current is a more appropriate Fig 11.
  6. Glad to see I'm not the only one who broke their TV whilst throwing large objects at it last night! She has got to be one the smuggest, snearing examples of the Zanu NL today.

    Is she their equivalent of Norman Tebbit!!!???? Revamped and updated for the new millenium (or did we go back to year zero at some point in the last 10 years).

  7. The Blair-babes? Who gave that name to a bunch of overweight, dowdily dressed, middle aged wimmin? What exactly have any of them achieved? I'm not against women in politics, just look at Mrs T for a great example of a strong willed politician, but this 'equality' thing just hasn't worked for Labour. The idea is that you should employ Ministers because it is politically correct to have so many women/minorities amongst your number is just utter tosh. Ministers should be appointed by virtue of ability.

    And if you are going to appoint female Ministers....at least make sure that they are easy on the eye and have nice tits.
  8. For those fortunate enough not to have listened to her drivel last night click below.


    Don't bother wasting your time listening to all her crap, just go to 33:33 - 35:34 on the time line and listen to her explaining how to solve the fuel price crisis.
    She doesn't even know the price of a barrell of oil FFS.
    She complains that the price of oil is governed by a "few countries". (Paxman voice) yeeeeaaaaas, that'll be OPEC then, the countries that produce the oil!
    She should have an O2 tag.
  9. On balance I find the Fig 11 more useful than this woman, although I am sure her constituents love her. Perhaps we could buy Salford and get rid of her?

  10. Waste of a fiver! I can get a pint and a bag of pork scratchings for that.
  11. Couldn't agree more, and i think also that they know what they are talking about.
  12. Was 'Bayonet Dummy' deliberately omitted from the list? Just imagine the pleasure you'd get.

    "High port! Low port! On guard! One thrust at the simpering vapid cretin to your front, at the double!"
  13. [pedantic mode on]Well not really. OPEC only produce 40% of the worlds oil. [pendant off]

    She is still a slimey toad though for all that.
  14. Good point; the only circumstances in which any of us would thrust ANYTHING into that fat, ugly, stupid, lying slag...
  15. She resembles a typical spinster primary school headteacher; completely out of touch with reality but convinced she is knows best having consistently aligned her targets with Zanu Labour thinking and got all the ticks in the right boxes.

    I fully concur with the Fig. 12 suggestion, not enough real substance to make a fig. 11.