when you guys at hte Soviet ministry for truth, or whatever the place where you churn out propaganda and attempt to weaponise social media is called, do you dread getting given the ARRSE login details, or rejoice?
I mean no matter what you say you're going to get called a dime bar, and get no positive feedback from your efforts. So is it considered easy street because your overseers know its goign to be ineffective, or do they demand results?
Of course every man and his dogski are aware that it is more than probable that Russia is involved. The real question is did Vlad the Bad Lad know? Or is he a puppet and the real men behind the throne remain hidden while pulling the strings? Curioser and curioser as Noddy said to Big Ears.
That Rachael Swindon Twitter account is run by a bloke who isn't called Rachael, funnily enough.
Either way, to address the title of the thread, there is enough evidence to point fingers. Probably not enough published evidence for a trial but then that wasn't the question. The balance of probability makes it extremely reasonable for Mrs May to be pointing fingers.
Have to agree ,did Vlad know before or after the act and has there been any oligarcal disappearences just lately. Have all the Embassy staff made it back to thier homes in Russia or are there some taking a free State Siberian Holiday now.