Harry and Megan: How long will it last?

How long


  • Total voters
    169
  • Poll closed .

Dwarf

LE
If ever proof were needed that there is now no way back for Harry, then surely it is this....

View attachment 562209


A baseball cap..... and worn backwards. He might be forgiventhe Nazi uniform indiscretions of his youth... but never this! Fortunately for him, the photograph has been cropped at the knee or else we might well have seen the skateboard on which he was standing.
1617638682726.png


I hope you all realise that while it is highly improbable if a tragic accident happened to William and kids, (Car/plane crash, tsunami, terrorist attack and so forth,) then THAT could be a future Henry IX bringing along with him Queen Meghan and Archie Prince of Wales.
Sleep well tonight.

Ed for crap proof-reading.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 562873

I hope you all realise that while is is highly improbable if a tragic accident happened to William and kids, (Car/plane crash, tsunami, terrorist attack and so forth,) then THAT could be a future Henry IX bringing along with him Queen Meghan and Archie Prince of Wales.
Sleep well tonight.

I've never liked you.
 
To the extent that as the Telegraph (Camilla Tooney & Hannah Furness) and the Express (Millie Bull) are sharing the same story from the earlier McClean's source (Patricia Treble), I am not surprised.

There are only so many world events with which to constantly fill so many column inches or minutes of airtime, so there is much more peaking over shoulders than originating utterley fresh material.

My 'compare' was intended between the Telegraph (or easier access Express) piece and the original MacClean source for what they made of the story - so mea culpa for poor signposting to the active MacClean article link.

ETA correct names
I get The Sunday Times and quite often I find many of the same articles almost word for word in The Mail the next day.
 

Dwarf

LE
I like you. But only online so I can look all alternative and kewl. You're nowhere near my Christmas card list.
 

Dwarf

LE
View attachment 562873

I hope you all realise that while it is highly improbable if a tragic accident happened to William and kids, (Car/plane crash, tsunami, terrorist attack and so forth,) then THAT could be a future Henry IX bringing along with him Queen Meghan and Archie Prince of Wales.
Sleep well tonight.

Ed for crap proof-reading.


Hmm... we'd need a Cromwell to dispose of him ala Charly 1!!
 

Cold_Collation

LE
Book Reviewer
Oops. MM in talking bòllocks shocker.


The Duchess of Sussex was told by the Queen that she was not obliged to be a full-time member of the Royal Family when she married Prince Harry and was free to keep acting, a royal biographer has claimed.

The Duchess revealed to Oprah Winfrey in a blockbuster interview last month that she was forced to give up her passport and driving licence when she joined the family in 2018, and that at times she felt suicidal and alone.

But Andrew Morton, who wrote a leading biography of Princess Diana, told the Royally Obsessed podcast that the Duchess was not prevented from pursuing her career or a private life and said Her Majesty gave the Sussexes different routes to take within the family.

“The Queen gave them [the Duke and Duchess] the opportunity to go wherever they pleased,” Mr Morton said. “They were given a degree of latitude.

“They were told: ‘Here are your first class tickets, pick which country you want to go to, we're going to make you youth ambassadors for the Commonwealth.’

"They did say to Meghan: ‘If you don't want to embrace royal duties full time please be our guest and continue your acting career.’ Those opportunities were open to her.”

The Duchess told Winfrey that she felt trapped at Kensington Palace, claiming she “left the house twice in four months” in 2019, a claim disputed by Mr Morton, who said the Duchess was often spotted shopping and eating at restaurants in west London.

He said: “When I was watching the interview, I was ticking off ‘yes, sense of isolation’, ‘yes, sense of desperation’, exactly what Diana was saying to me.

“But then again, friends of mine said they've seen Meghan walking from Whole Foods supermarket on Kensington High Street with bags of foods back to Kensington Palace.

“It didn't seem too much like a prison. Other friends have seen her out and about with friends at restaurants, so she seems, to me, to have led a normal life.”

Mr Morton also claimed that the Sussexes had been hasty in stepping back from royal life in 2020 and did not fully consider the consequences of leaving.

“I think neither of them gave it the thought they should have done,” he said.

“I think that famous warning from Prince William of ‘steady on, think about what you're doing’, that Harry bridled at, was probably meant more with affection.”
 
Oops. MM in talking bòllocks shocker.

I did wonder for a brief second whether Morton wrote that bollocks while being thoroughly bummed by Omid Scobie. One could mistake Morton's belated ululations as the beautiful agony of the love that dare not speak its name from very much the "pillow biting" perspective of the "taker", which is a step along the spectrum from his moans of achieving onanistic completion at the thought of the corpse of Diana spread across the back seat of a Merc that was otherwise due to be moments away from being split by Moorish girth.
 
I did wonder for a brief second whether Morton wrote that bollocks while being thoroughly bummed by Omid Scobie. One could mistake Morton's belated ululations as the beautiful agony of the love that dare not speak its name from very much the "pillow biting" perspective of the "taker", which is a step along the spectrum from his moans of achieving onanistic completion at the thought of the corpse of Diana spread across the back seat of a Merc that was otherwise due to be moments away from being split by Moorish girth.

Barbara Cartland walt !
 
Am I the only one that thinks that in actual fact it was Harry that refused Royal Protection (and not the other way around) because his mother was dong the "beast with two backs" with hers and he's worried he might come home to Meegain being spit-roasted by a couple of Scotland Yard's finest?

I'm just putting it out there...….
 
Am I the only one that thinks that in actual fact it was Harry that refused Royal Protection (and not the other way around) because his mother was dong the "beast with two backs" with hers and he's worried he might come home to Meegain being spit-roasted by a couple of Scotland Yard's finest?

I'm just putting it out there...….
Not Gate of the Yard?? :oops: :)
 

exsniffer

Old-Salt
View attachment 562873

I hope you all realise that while it is highly improbable if a tragic accident happened to William and kids, (Car/plane crash, tsunami, terrorist attack and so forth,) then THAT could be a future Henry IX bringing along with him Queen Meghan and Archie Prince of Wales.
Sleep well tonight.

Ed for crap proof-reading.
I never thought that I could be persuaded to be a republican
 
Am I the only one that thinks that in actual fact it was Harry that refused Royal Protection (and not the other way around) because his mother was dong the "beast with two backs" with hers and he's worried he might come home to Meegain being spit-roasted by a couple of Scotland Yard's finest?

I'm just putting it out there...….
Three backs surely...
 
Top