I’d say he’s heading into direct competition with the Beckhams re brand and fashion accessories.
The difference being that there is no larger, overarching brand on which the Beckham brand depends for its existence. One that risked being diminished and cheapened by association. The Beckham brand prospers or suffers in its own right.That's crossed my mind, too.
Yet you still typed all of that shite?Beacause it has run its course, and some are pig sick of the overwhelming press attention, The papers and TV channels filled with the minutiae and inconsequential outcome of their decisions, which when you analyse it, does not impact on the lives of Joe Soap one iota, it has evolved into "West enders, a story of dysfunctional folk" with all the accompanying arse lickers, toadies and sycophants having their moment of glory. The end result, will be a messy divorce, the house of Windsor thrown into disarray, and the world will latch onto the next big thing.
If nothing else, it diverts the faceless masses attention away from the real issues that do effect our mundane existence. The whole thing is just that, a thing, to be watched, commented on, dissected and discussed, that is until a bigger "Crisis" arises. At the end of the day, ask yourself this question, "How will it impact my life, will it effect my earning power, and will I still be able to feed and house my family?"
Nothing more to see here move on.......and FFS... get a life.
I imagine Harry has landed back to his new life this morning and found a very different reality waiting for him.His future is predicated almost entirely on what went before. I don't believe that he could have considered the consequences, or else he misread things rather badly.
As far as Meghan is concerned, it is merely a return to things as she knew them, albeit she will probably fashion her future career pitches employing as much of the royal cachet as remains. If they go down that route, I have no doubt that it will rebound and will attract the kind of media attention that they say want to avoid.
I doubt if Harry has worked that one out, either.
Indeed as I said the other day, Harry has given up pretty much everything, by comparison what exactly has Meghan given up/lost.You are very right. We don't know what the discussions were but I guess the decision was either you're in or you're out - you can't cherry pick. Who decides the diary and who decides the priority The conflict between Duty, The Firm or making money is huge. I know it has been mentioned in other posts but a good example is the Disney Premier versus the Royal Marines Deal Commemoration. That was almost a game changer. Was H "persuaded" by M to push for a role? It was all very awkward.
M still has her "support network" and her game plan. H is very much adrift and now can't attend a function at a military base and then and adjourn to the mess and have a laugh and a few drinks with the lads.
Unfortunately as the influence and relevance falls away, the patronage of charities may also fall and that is another safety net removed.
Charles is using Drupal, Harry is using WordpressI've just looked at the "Official Website Sussex Royal" The Official Website of The Duke & Duchess of Sussex
It's bloody awful! Floaty text and fiddly to navigate
I then looked at Prince Charles. Easy to navigate and straightforward.
Not seen but I am guessing that you mean Garter King of Arms who is effectively Chief Herald, in charge of the College of Arms which oversees the granting and licit use of titles.Something brief on this morning's news, the bloke in charge of the Order of the Garter is supposedly suggesting a Royal ban hammer be swung at " Sussex Royal" as a brand name.
And the correct number is?? In my time there was no limit provided you ate all the food that was on your plate.There has NEVER been any debate on how many sausages are acceptable for a military breakfast. Indeed many chefs are employed solely to reaffirm the correct number!
(I agree on the rest though).
Ring 1 800 663-9122 for BC child protective services and voice your concerns, under Canadian law they have to investigate any reports. She wants to live here, status doesn't play a factor in child endangerment, we all are subject to the standards of providing care.That baby looks most uncomfortable and insecure. Is she used to carrying him?
Ring 1 800 663-9122 for BC child protective services and voice your concerns, under Canadian law they have to investigate. She wants to live here, status doesn't play a factor in child endangerment, we all are subject to the standards of providing care.
Would be kinda pointless though considering
the nannyHarry has now arrived on scene to pick up his roll, babies need carrying and dogs need walking, can’t afford much hired help these days apparently.......