Harry and Megan: How long will it last?

How long


  • Total voters
    169
  • Poll closed .

Cutaway

LE
Kit Reviewer
Probably the worst thing they could possibly do is have another car crash interview with the great Oprah.

So that's exactly what they will do.
They're suing her for making them look like lying clowns.
 

Cutaway

LE
Kit Reviewer
And a comment I read was that Meghan deplored gun violence as a mother.
But she surrounds herself with men with guns.
Even prior to becoming a mother she didn't just deplore "gun violence," she deplored firearms full stop.
She instructed her wife to get rid of his sporting guns and rifles.
Which he then dutifully and timidly did.
 
Even prior to becoming a mother she didn't just deplore "gun violence," she deplored firearms full stop.
She instructed her wife to get rid of his sporting guns and rifles.
Which he then dutifully and timidly did.
Gun controls are often associated with tyrants, Adolf wasn't very keen on any likely opponents having them. Sort of suggests that they know they are in the wrong before they start.
 
Oprah's standing and career has already been fouled by the first interview - after previously having publically promoted or championed at least two others who have turned out to be not all they claimed to be / fast and loose with the small matter of facts.

They may be visiting, but Ms Winfrey surely is not fool enought to put herself through the wringer again after 17 lies were easily and quickly identified straight after that last celebration of twisted ego. She has no need of money but maintaining a credible reputation must still matter. No one is rich enough to comfortably endure being widely regarded as a dupe and a patsy.

Questions as to whether the car was headed to - or from - Oprah's

Also word is emerging that Spotify is done with them. (will edit in source) so were they heading (Meghan fresh faced and make-up free in the back seat - or raddled ) to Oprah's for media legal advice over penalty clauses for non-performance, or back after getting the 'no' to another interview. Or it is all an act to garner Oprah's sympathy. And why is the new actress mate Janina Gavankar (not Mrs M-Bs Archewell minion Mandana Dayani as the Mail states) delivering the finger wag lecture from the frontseat?
 
Last edited:

Joshua Slocum

LE
Book Reviewer
Oprah's standing and career has already been fouled by the first interview - after previously having publically promoted or championed at least two others who have turned out to be not all they claimed to be / fast and loose with the small matter of facts.

They may be visiting, but Ms Winfrey surely is not fool enought to put herself through the wringer again after 17 lies were easily and quickly identified straight after that last celebration of twisted ego. She has no need of money but maintaining a credible reputation must still matter. No one is rich enough to comfortably endure being widely regarded as a dupe and a patsy.

Questions as to whether the car was headed to - or from - Oprah's
They might just have popped round for some soul food!!
 
Oprah will want assurances. So no more lies then. :rolleyes:

See they needed a security detail for the five minute drive. Now that is delusional.

And a comment I read was that Meghan deplored gun violence as a mother.
But she surrounds herself with men with guns.
She may deplore it as an alleged mother, but as a Duchess of the UK married to a Prince (which in her truth makes her a Princess) it's no more than her entitlement.
 

Dwarf

LE
Book Reviewer
Here's a thought. Voldemeg's control of the narrative has slipped badly and after Uvalde and the Jubilee, with W&K's visit coming up she desperately needs to reassert her truth as the narrative. It also occurs that getting in a pre-emptive strike before the visit might have crossed her mind.*
What better way to achieve a fast worldwide statement of position than an Oprah chat?
Bear in mind she may also be setting up for a counter to the Bower book which is likely to be extremely damaging to her image. Again a fast, conspicuous way to answer rather than lengthy interviews and articles.

I think unless Oprah sets it up extremely carefully she would be dumb to do this. Though she may be looking to balance out the damage the first interview did to her reputation and if she can get it right a second time she may consider it to be a good move.

*With the worst of the Hollywood mentality that instead of outdoing the competition you have to pull them down.
 

Grownup_Rafbrat

ADC
Kit Reviewer
Book Reviewer
Reviews Editor
In a convoy that looks like something out of a Jason Bourne film…?

How ridiculous do they look? But it got them top story in the Daily Mail. Job jobbed.
The Mail is not on their side. After the court case it would do anything to bring them down. Although they are quite good at it themselves, a newspaper scorned is a fearsome enemy.

Maybe Grand Old Oprah was giving them a b0ll0cking?
 
Here's a thought. Voldemeg's control of the narrative has slipped badly and after Uvalde and the Jubilee, with W&K's visit coming up she desperately needs to reassert her truth as the narrative. It also occurs that getting in a pre-emptive strike before the visit might have crossed her mind.*
What better way to achieve a fast worldwide statement of position than an Oprah chat?
Bear in mind she may also be setting up for a counter to the Bower book which is likely to be extremely damaging to her image. Again a fast, conspicuous way to answer rather than lengthy interviews and articles.

I think unless Oprah sets it up extremely carefully she would be dumb to do this. Though she may be looking to balance out the damage the first interview did to her reputation and if she can get it right a second time she may consider it to be a good move.

*With the worst of the Hollywood mentality that instead of outdoing the competition you have to pull them down.
The proof of the pudding is that the Montecito Morons have disappeared entirely from the front pages of the women's mags (even the usual sycophants, Hello and OK) whereas a few months ago they were all over them. Instead, they are all cooing over Williams 40th and lots of coverage of W & K and the family. Meagain has got to pull some pretty big rabbits out of the hat to appear relevant again - and the hat looks pretty empty.

As an aside, does someone REALLY sit outside Mountbatten-Windsor towers with a camera hoping to get snaps of them? What a sad person, have they got nothing better to do (like counting their legs, for example)?
 

Grownup_Rafbrat

ADC
Kit Reviewer
Book Reviewer
Reviews Editor
The proof of the pudding is that the Montecito Morons have disappeared entirely from the front pages of the women's mags (even the usual sycophants, Hello and OK) whereas a few months ago they were all over them. Instead, they are all cooing over Williams 40th and lots of coverage of W & K and the family. Meagain has got to pull some pretty big rabbits out of the hat to appear relevant again - and the hat looks pretty empty.

As an aside, does someone REALLY sit outside Mountbatten-Windsor towers with a camera hoping to get snaps of them? What a sad person, have they got nothing better to do (like counting their legs, for example)?
Paparazzo, pictures sell.

Or Daily Mail Revenge Reporter?
 
I remember that there was a big stink over the pap who managed to get photos of Diana dying in the Paris tunnel. There doesn't seem to be any code of decency amongst that ilk.
Nor the chattering classes who want to see it.

as epitomised so well here

932_big.jpg
 

Latest Threads

Top