HandGuns vs. Bows

handgun or bow?

  • bow

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • handgun

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
#1
As the title says, pretty much.
Which would you rather carry, a handgun or a bow and arrow?

Personally a bow, as you can re-use the ammunition and they have less movin parts to use. Also, whomever you hit with said arrow is going to have a much harder time moving around with a 2 foot long arrow sticking out of a limb, and a razor-edged head will carve up the muscle inside.
 
#4
Guess what. Just by the post I can tell you aren't in the Army.

If you miss with your first arrow I've filled you with an entire mag of 9mm rounds. If I have a stoppage I will carry out the correct drills and fire again before your second arrow. I think I made my point?
 
#5
ub3rb0wl said:
As the title says, pretty much.
Which would you rather carry, a handgun or a bow and arrow?

Personally a bow, as you can re-use the ammunition and they have less movin parts to use. Also, whomever you hit with said arrow is going to have a much harder time moving around with a 2 foot long arrow sticking out of a limb, and a razor-edged head will carve up the muscle inside.
Are you a hoodie terrorising your local estate :?

Edited to say.
Could we have a Neither Im not a Phycho Walt in the poll aswell.
 
#6
It's also a bit of a bugger trying to find a handy shoulder holster for your longbow.

Clint Eastwood's "Go ahead punk, make my day" speech would also be a trifle pointless as it's extremely easy to see if someone has an arrow in their bow or not.
 
#7
Reggie prefers the tomahawk, while I tend to go for the catapult depending on terrain, weather etc
 
#9
The_Terrible_Twins said:
Reggie prefers the tomahawk, while I tend to go for the catapult depending on terrain, weather etc
Didn't you two do the trials for the Black & Decker nail gun?
 
#10
It's also down to training. In ye olden days it took a life time to master the long bow and it was law that you practiced. Firearms where easy to use and did not take a great deal of training or skill to get a result - think musket volley fire or Operation Trident.
 
#11
It doesn't take a lifetime to master the longbow. What takes time is strengthening the muscles which must be used to draw a 100lb bow or more and keeping those muscles in trim with regular practice. Obviously archers would work on accuracy at the same time. It's hard work drawing a 100lb+ bow at a rate of 12 flights per minute.
 
#12
Bugger me, William Tells, joined Para Regt.
 
#13
Fallschirmjager said:
It doesn't take a lifetime to master the longbow. What takes time is strengthening the muscles which must be used to draw a 100lb bow or more and keeping those muscles in trim with regular practice. Obviously archers would work on accuracy at the same time. It's hard work drawing a 100lb+ bow at a rate of 12 flights per minute.
True, a good friend of mine can hit a man size target at 200 yards with his longbow, not once but 25 times in a row in just under 2 minutes. Mind you he's 6'4" and ginger too 8O . Pop down to Bisley or Apps court he's been using the longbow for years and I wouldn't fancy my chances against him starting 200 yards out, me with my Browning and him with his bow :omfg:
 
#14
minister_doh_nut said:
Bugger me
You must be bored of it now M_D_N :twisted:

Anyway less of the bad language ub3rbowl is only a young 15 year old whos into weapons.
 
#15
Fallschirmjager said:
It doesn't take a lifetime to master the longbow. What takes time is strengthening the muscles which must be used to draw a 100lb bow or more and keeping those muscles in trim with regular practice. Obviously archers would work on accuracy at the same time. It's hard work drawing a 100lb+ bow at a rate of 12 flights per minute.
Ok, I may have over exadurated the time frame just a smidgen :D
But this brings in why cross bows came in as they did not need a human gorilla to use them.

But 12 flights in 60 seconds is a hell of a lot better than 3 rounds/60 sec with a musket (and more accurate).
 
#16
The crossbow hasn't got a patch on the longbow. A longbow archer could let loose 3 times as many flights as a crossbowman. The longbow has also got much more distance and power. In fact, in late medieval Britain anyone with a crossbow would have been regarded as scum and received a kicking!
 

Sixty

ADC
Moderator
Book Reviewer
#19
Fallschirmjager said:
The crossbow hasn't got a patch on the longbow. A longbow archer could let loose 3 times as many flights as a crossbowman. The longbow has also got much more distance and power. In fact, in late medieval Britain anyone with a crossbow would have been regarded as scum and received a kicking!
Would agree on speed and range but a crossbow stores a hell of a lot more energy and so is more powerful (if my memory hasn't packed in again).
 
#20
Fallschirmjager said:
Hugh_Jardon said:
Archers, the maroon machine of the medieval period?
Yes. Lower class scum but worth every penny! :D
They were not cheap though, Henry V paid £15,000 for 1 million arrows in 1415, just imagine what £15K bought in thoses days, and it would have taken his archers at Agincourt just under 20 minutes to loose them off. They didn't half "brass up" the french :wink: ... 50,000 rnds a minute or 800 a second 8O
 

Similar threads

New Posts

Latest Threads