Guillotine dodgers strike again - expenses part 2

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by FORMER_FYRDMAN, Oct 18, 2012.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:


    FORMER_FYRDMAN LE Book Reviewer

  2. They don't want the addresses leaked, not for security but because someone may find out who's renting to who and go round and smash their windows.....
  3. mercurydancer

    mercurydancer LE Book Reviewer

    Pigs - Form up - snouts ready, into the trough in your own time.

    As soon as this one raised its head I thought it would be an Arrse topic instantly.

    The fcukers in parliament have no conscience whatsoever. They cannot if they are subletting for profit places paid for with taxpayer money. It was not mentioned in the last expenses scandal because no one thought of the dodge. We have now, and we dont want addresses, just names.

    Bercow is right to be concerned about security, but a differently worded FOI request would be useful. If he doesnt grant one then he should be thrown out of his chair. He may well be subletting his own gaff as he gets a nice pad for grace and favour. its not illegal. For the rest of the bastards it probably should be.