Government spends £37m fighting benefit cut appeals.

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by AIR FILTER, Jun 1, 2013.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Good.
  2. Not really it doesnt mention how many its lost.
    For example my mum life limiting disease completely genuine full medical history denied benefits for 4 months messed around gets to appeal chief doctor at her appeal witters on about her diabetes which is only a minor part of whats wrong with her.
    Rapidly realizes he's talking shit whole thing is over in less than an hour.
    Fair amount spent on case work a pointless medical assesment atos laughing all the way to the bank.
    Yes there maybe people swinging the lead but it maybe at case of smoke and mirrors
  3. One piece of data that's very notable by its absence is the amount saved by benefit cuts...
  4. The government won 57% of the appeals, so no it doesnt
  5. Something just over a third of appeals are successful.
  6. Sixty

    Sixty LE Moderator Book Reviewer
    1. ARRSE Cyclists and Triathletes

    Or indeed why our supposedly 'generous' benefits tend towards the lower end of the scale in Europe.

    I'm yet to be convinced that paying people something like fifty odd quid a week brought down Lehman Bros, RBS, Lloyds, Northern Rock et al.

    This demonisation* of the poor is as transparent as it is loathsome.

    *as evidenced in the first link, not your post Matt.
    • Like Like x 3
  7. Wrong place to ask. :)
  8. Is this the same £50 a week that had people protesting about the £500 a week benefits cap?
    • Like Like x 1
  9. I'd actually tend to agree that the jobseekers allowance is too low... the problem we have is that there are far too many benefits. Those who need them tend to be hard done by, whilst the 'career scroungers' who know the system inside out can claim far more.

    The benefit cap is a good start, but what we really need is a massively simplified system.
    • Like Like x 5
  10. Sixty

    Sixty LE Moderator Book Reviewer
    1. ARRSE Cyclists and Triathletes

    Pretty much. Benefit payments didn't bring the financial world crashing down, despite what the Conservative party and those who fawn upon them would have you believe.
    • Like Like x 4
  11. True - but they're hardly helping the recovery.
  12. Caecilius

    Caecilius LE Reviewer Book Reviewer

    No, but then the financial world did rather well for the rest of the country until it crashed. It will do so again now that it's largely recovered.

    If people chose to be less reliant on banks (you are perfectly welcome to keep your money in a safe under the bed) then the crash wouldn't have been a problem for the average person. You sound like the sort who moans about the banks lending badly, then moans about them not lending enough to small (read: incredibly risky) businesses.

    Besides which, we were running a deficit even before the crash. Given that welfare was the section of the budget with by far the greatest annual increases since 1997 (excepting the NHS, but that's welfare of sorts) it seems the obvious area to trim to cut the deficit.

    Posted from the ARRSE Mobile app (iOS or Android)
    • Like Like x 2