Ghislaine Maxwell Trial

Blowing off French chick's, manual strangulation and owls.

Exactly what porn are you watching?
Was the French chick an owl nestling?
I didn't know there was a market for Avian snuff movies.

bigbird.jpg
 
After all, as long as someone goes to a privatised jail, right?


The real scandal was not what was going on but how many knew and were feeding off the fatted calf/ it brought money into the community, so why rock the boat.
 
Slightly off topic but I'm currently watching the HBO series Staircase. Fascinating case and it seems the US system is completely screwed, trial by media, pleas bargains and effectively blackmail to co-erce witness cooperation. What an absolutely fucked up system from the land of the free. Boris Grrrr

Absolutely the best system that money can buy.

If you have the money to pay for a decent lawyer you will likely get away with murder. If you have no money and receive the services of an overworked court appointed public defender you will do time, innocent, or guilty. Public defenders are underpaid and overworked, they will negotiate on your behalf with the district attorney.

Lawyers can earn very good money from the off. The best and brightest get offered jobs at good law firms. Next down the pecking order are the ones who get offered jobs with DA’s offices, they can sharpen themselves up a bit before moving on to private practice. At the bottom of the list of poorly connected, or poor achievers are the public defenders. Some may argue but, it is a generally held opinion.

Say for example you are a poor black man accused of an offence that attracts a ten year sentence. There is a chance you may, with a shite public defender, actually get convicted even if you are innocent. So a deal for two years, out in fifteen months for good behaviour starts to look good.

Innocent men bargaining a deal for a lesser sentence is not uncommon. And the systems is stacked against people with no money. That is why we have legal insurance, and we all carry our lawyers business card in our wallets next to our driving licences.
 
If that's the case, maxwell is between a rock and a hard place, if she tells all, she will have an "accident" if she doesn't, she will banged up for life, in solitary, to make sure she doesn't. Which tells you all you need to know about american morality, and who really runs the country.
Then she wasn't smart enough to have various names and times/locations etc drafted and copied and stashed in a number of secret locations to be released to media across the globe in the event of a nasty accident or worse and make that be known that they are out there and will surface if anything happens.
 
Watch the Netflix documentary. It’s not as agenda leaning. Spoiler: he blew off that French chick as soon as he got out. She, like others, was used. There was no owl. The injuries only match manual strangulation. He did it.
I'm more upset about the stolen valour although throwing two wives down the stairs shows a distinct lack of imagination.
 
Then she wasn't smart enough to have various names and times/locations etc drafted and copied and stashed in a number of secret locations to be released to media across the globe in the event of a nasty accident or worse and make that be known that they are out there and will surface if anything happens.

Unless she has video evidence of someone pumping an underage girl or testimony from that girl, its unlikely that she has any credible evidence of anything.
 
Well there is that aspect but if you have names of all the participants/dates/times etc then let the investigation journos do the rest.

Not really much for them to go on, Rich person travelled on a nonces plane 20 years ago probably wont result in anything newsworthy.
Its the victims who need to come forward and they will either have been paid off or wont testify through fear.
I don't think Maxwell has any real proof against anyone.
 

Nemesis44UK

LE
Book Reviewer
With regards to the American legal system, it's quite astonishing what they can get away with. In Making A Murderer, the DA is holding a news conference telling everyone that the accused is guilty before, during and after the trial. Evidence is planted (the casings in the bedroom that were on the floor yet the first search never found them) and all sorts of shenanigans that we wouldn't put up with because of sub judice etc.

With The Staircase, I haven't seen the new drama series, but I watched the documentary series on it some time ago. What haunts me is to hear his daughters talking about their dad's innocence with eyes brimming with tears. You can see them wrestling with the facts. The documentary was heavily biased towards his innocence, it was quite a shock to me when he was convicted. Having said that, subsequent reading up and the fact that his first wife died in identical circumstances removed much of the doubt.

Even if he was innocent, he might Alford plea anyway, people will always think he did it, so why not get out of prison early?
 
Well there is that aspect but if you have names of all the participants/dates/times etc then let the investigation journos do the rest.
They would soon be a dead jorno
 

Grownup_Rafbrat

ADC
Kit Reviewer
Book Reviewer
Reviews Editor
To whom, anyone with that information is a bullet magnet
Scatter it everywhere simultaneously. Lawyers, newspapers, TV, Oprah Winfrey, you name it!
 

Grownup_Rafbrat

ADC
Kit Reviewer
Book Reviewer
Reviews Editor
I seem to recall that during Maxwell’s trial Epstein’s pilot stated that Trump had also used his plane on occasion.

I don’t say that as ‘whataboutery’, but more at my bemusement that some get the ‘nothing to see here, move along’ treatment, while Hillary particularly gets the ‘she must be a witch, burn her’ approach.

Just seems odd, to me.

There was at one time much wailing and gnashing of teeth from the left leaning conspiraloons about Trump and Epstein and how him using the aircraft proved (insert whatever anti Trump theory you have)

Its died out, possibly because people have sensibly accepted the point that Trump leased / borrowed the aircraft to fly from A to B theres been no evidence presnted he ever visited that island - The Clintons did.

Personally given the anti trump loons are no better than the "Killary" loons, I find it highly unlikely theyve taken such a sensible position and so I suggest it hasnt gained traction for 4 reasons

1) Pointing at Trump using a plane backfires when the response is Bill used the Island

2) The focus shifted to Andy and until the government stops protecting him and convicts him of being a dirty paedo the focus will remain on him. *

3) The types of people who pointed fingers at Trump are the type who called him racist for building a wall (the same one Obama was building and Hillary called for). The type who insisted not voting for Hillary made you a fascist, tell you that you are inherintly racist because you are white or scream youre transphobic if you suggest men (anyone with male genitals )shouldnt be in ladies changing rooms. In short the band jumping loony activist types who have cried wolf so often and whose default setting is White male guilty that people are starting to tune them out.

4) Contrary to general expectations of RW types - the RW conspiraloon fringe - i wont say is better organised but it does seem to be better at generating a narrative and it tends to throw specific mud a specific individuals rather than entitre groups** As such theres a more credible air to the gullible .

For example - The clintons were intimatly associated with Pizza gate itself a completely ludicrous peace of wibble yet has gained traction globaly





*You can judge for yourself the motivations (and intellect) of individuals who have determined that the only reason Andy hasnt been convicted for somethng he was never accused of is because hes protected.

**Except the Jews of course - but since the left hate them just as much
 
She could reduce that sentence, say a year off for every name named. Odd that only one, who happens to be a very big, non-US target, has been named, albeit without reliable witness or evidence.
The problem is that if she was rumored to ready to talk about either half of a very big US couple she would very surprised when she “commits suicide”
 
The problem is that if she was rumored to ready to talk about either half of a very big US couple she would very surprised when she “commits suicide”

First name initials B + H by any chance?
 
With regards to the American legal system, it's quite astonishing what they can get away with. In Making A Murderer, the DA is holding a news conference telling everyone that the accused is guilty before, during and after the trial. Evidence is planted (the casings in the bedroom that were on the floor yet the first search never found them) and all sorts of shenanigans that we wouldn't put up with because of sub judice etc.

With The Staircase, I haven't seen the new drama series, but I watched the documentary series on it some time ago. What haunts me is to hear his daughters talking about their dad's innocence with eyes brimming with tears. You can see them wrestling with the facts. The documentary was heavily biased towards his innocence, it was quite a shock to me when he was convicted. Having said that, subsequent reading up and the fact that his first wife died in identical circumstances removed much of the doubt.

Even if he was innocent, he might Alford plea anyway, people will always think he did it, so why not get out of prison early?

I was out and about with an undercover US Plod narcotics unit doing post sales door knocking to nick a crack manufacturer that an undercover had bought from.

By the time we got back to the HQ building with the prisoner, crack, and seized firearms a news conference was being set up. Press and TV cameras were already on site, tables set up to display the haul, and the police chief was there waiting for the head of the unit before starting. They tried to drag me into it as a visiting British copper but, I had a subsequent engagement with a coffe machine.

Cases are tried in the media here, no matter how much they argue the toss . They all want to be on telly, or have their picture in the paper. The reason being is that most of the muppets are elected into their positions so they need the PR to hang onto their well paying elected jobs. Sheriffs are directly elected, Police Chiefs are appointed, or fired, by the Mayor, and Mayors are elected. It gets professional at the level of State Police who are less affected by local city (police) and county (sheriff) politics.

As a side note: If I had gathered evidence and presented it into court case the way I have seen police and sheriffs collect it here I would have been rifted. At one location I was assissting with collecting and processing evidence and doing it like we do in the UK. I received a few WTF’s from city detectives who were just dropping evidence into brown paper bags and writing on the side with a felt tip. Their Lt. loudly explained to them that the way I was doing it is best practice and is the way that the DEA and FBI do it.
 
I was out and about with an undercover US Plod narcotics unit doing post sales door knocking to nick a crack manufacturer that an undercover had bought from.

By the time we got back to the HQ building with the prisoner, crack, and seized firearms a news conference was being set up. Press and TV cameras were already on site, tables set up to display the haul, and the police chief was there waiting for the head of the unit before starting. They tried to drag me into it as a visiting British copper but, I had a subsequent engagement with a coffe machine.

Cases are tried in the media here, no matter how much they argue the toss . They all want to be on telly, or have their picture in the paper. The reason being is that most of the muppets are elected into their positions so they need the PR to hang onto their well paying elected jobs. Sheriffs are directly elected, Police Chiefs are appointed, or fired, by the Mayor, and Mayors are elected. It gets professional at the level of State Police who are less affected by local city (police) and county (sheriff) politics.

As a side note: If I had gathered evidence and presented it into court case the way I have seen police and sheriffs collect it here I would have been rifted. At one location I was assissting with collecting and processing evidence and doing it like we do in the UK. I received a few WTF’s from city detectives who were just dropping evidence into brown paper bags and writing on the side with a felt tip. Their Lt. loudly explained to them that the way I was doing it is best practice and is the way that the DEA and FBI do it.
Have an excellent for inducing WTFs.
 

Latest Threads

Top