Chatted to one of the marshals of a local hunt at lunchtime today in the boozer. It appears that the hunt is prepared to carry on hunting under guise of exercise club. However they are very unwilling to submit meekly to self-appointed monitors from organisations such as the LACS. It seems that an example will be made of the first "monitor" to try and chuck his/her weight around. This will involve some intimidation at the point of contact by terrier men/marshals etc but will predominantly involve litigation funded by wealthy supporters. However under the right to roam legislation I find it hard to see what law the hunt/supporters are looking to exploit. Any clues/views (other than view hulloas obviously)?