Finally, proof that left wingers are a bunch of weaky wimps!

#1
According to the Telegraph "Strong Men are more likely to vote Conservative"

Physically strong men are more likely to hold right wing political views because they believe society should be geared to personal struggle and self-preservation, an academic study claims.
...
Lead researcher Aaron Sell said men were 'designed for fighting' and the tougher they are, the more this influences their behaviour and attitudes.
Men are better designed to respond rapidly to threats, avoid something that is thrown at them or be able to catch it, and are better at taking a punch, he said.
This comes from their ancestral roots where physical aggression was used to establish status within a community.
And many men still do this, believing that if they are better at fighting and look more menacing, then their status is elevated.
Plus, as the highlighted bit implies, we're better at dealing with marriage. :twisted:
 
#2
Absolutely, Mes Chers...... There was dear Old Ken Livingstum bawling his eyes out at being selected as the "Chosen Man of Liarbor" with Mr Ed looking like a spare pr*ck at a wedding......

What dear Old Ken wants is, like all Good Komrades and Marxist Socialists... he wants Londoners to share the collective Misery of Socialisms....

"The sole aim of Socialism is the equal sharing of collective misery..........!" So that proves that Ken is a Wimp!! (Hmm, so is Mr Ed)

... so... here is some misery.......!!
 

Attachments

#3
... so... here is some misery.......!!
Clearly, the 3 Yankee Limas at the top are in search of a Conservative who will be Liberal with his, ahem, affections.

The Teletubby photo is clearly staged - none of the bottles are broken and there is no pool of liquid between the legs.

Number 3 is indeed the reptilian face of socialism

I have no idea WTF number 4 on the bottom left is. I'm sure there is no mathematical theorem that guarantees, requires or even desires its continued existence, though.
 

TheIronDuke

ADC
Book Reviewer
#5
#8
As PJ O'Rourke wrote, the key difference between a Nazi and a liberal is that no one ever fantasizes about torrid sex dsessions with someone dressed up in a rubber & leather liberal outfit.
 
#9
I have no idea WTF number 4 on the bottom left is. I'm sure there is no mathematical theorem that guarantees, requires or even desires its continued existence, though.


Not a proof but might help working out what the cost could be...
 
#10
#12
As PJ O'Rourke wrote, the key difference between a Nazi and a liberal is that no one ever fantasizes about torrid sex dsessions with someone dressed up in a rubber & leather liberal outfit.
There was a time when a large section of the Guardian's readership was in love with the idea of getting a reach around from Nick Clegg.
 
#13
As a working class communist bolshie boot-boy I could not possibly comment. But let us take a look at these Conservative 'strong men' shall we?
Fuck me. You are right. You Tory Boys really are the dogs bollocks. Now fuck off and grub about for money.
The problem with the left wingers is that they don't really understand statistics nor do they understand causality. There are indeed a considerable number of weak-willed, window-licking, goons on the right of the political divide. However, they are there because, in their sheep-like fashion, they recognize that they need the inspired leadership of the truly intelligent and they flock to us strong men (and women) to fill that void in their otherwise empty and meaningless existences. Lefties, on the other hand, are so overwhelmed by their narcissitic impulses that, even though they are truly witless"girlie men", they are hypnotized by the light of adoration that shines back at them from their mirrors.

It is no coincidence that when trying to explain the mass-giving properties of the Higgs Boson (*), scientists chose Saint Margaret to explain attraction and not some faceless, socialist non-entity .

higgs2-200x135.gif

[HR][/HR]
Note:

(*) That's the hypothetical elementary particle predicted to arise as an excitation of the Higgs Field, not the ARRSE user of similar name that arises from the mirror-induced excitation of its own Ego Field. ... I'm being rather loose with terminology here for effect; it is NAAFI, after all. For a more complete description of the Higgs Mechanism, start here.
 
#14
#15
The article seems to imply the study was based only on Hollywood actors. If you take Hollywood as standard measure for anything, then you're up shit creek. It doesn't say if the study took physical measurements of men who voted conservative.
 
#16
Not that I'm going to quote Iron Duke's post in its entirety but could it be the quickest Godwin's Law could be called?
And just what bit of Hitler being in charge of the National SOCIALISTS leads you to link him with Conservatism?
You'll be telling us that nice Uncle Joe Stalin was a secret Tory next.
 
#17
The article seems to imply the study was based only on Hollywood actors. If you take Hollywood as standard measure for anything, then you're up shit creek. It doesn't say if the study took physical measurements of men who voted conservative.
If they'd done the study using you, it would have proved you are an unintelligent sack of Giraffe spunk, with an IQ lower than a dead amoeba, completely unaware of anything other than your own self importance, you cunt!
 

Similar threads

Top