Film4 tonight

#1
Dog Soldiers, 11:35 tonight. Can't wait
 

ACAB

On ROPS
On ROPs
#6
Loads of inaccuracies.

Still a cracking good film though!
 
#10
What sort of cockstand gets outraged at inaccuracies in a film about soldiers fighting ******* werewolves?

"I say, that's not the correct webbing for the period this movie is set in."

"Bruv, there's fuckin werewolves knocking about and a geezer just tucked his guts back in."

"Yes but they should at least consider that there's around 300 ex-serviceman sad enough to give a shit about their webbing / tactics / BFA. I'm going to type things about it on ARRSE."

"Put ya beer down and get the **** out of my house you melt."


I think I'll bang Outpost on first and make it a double cheese bill. Sorted.
 
#11
What sort of cockstand gets outraged at inaccuracies in a film about soldiers fighting ******* werewolves?

"I say, that's not the correct webbing for the period this movie is set in."

"Bruv, there's fuckin werewolves knocking about and a geezer just tucked his guts back in."

"Yes but they should at least consider that there's around 300 ex-serviceman sad enough to give a shit about their webbing / tactics / BFA. I'm going to type things about it on ARRSE."

"Put ya beer down and get the **** out of my house you melt."


I think I'll bang Outpost on first and make it a double cheese bill. Sorted.
Ooooooooooooh, someone's lost their sense of humour then.

Personally, I thought it was a shit film, not because of the inaccuracies, but just because it was shit, but then I think most films are (particularly ones from Hollywood).

However, if someone does make a film about an historical event, then I think that they should ensure that they do their research properly.
 
#13
Ooooooooooooh, someone's lost their sense of humour then.

Personally, I thought it was a shit film, not because of the inaccuracies, but just because it was shit, but then I think most films are (particularly ones from Hollywood).

However, if someone does make a film about an historical event, then I think that they should ensure that they do their research properly.
If you read that as being a sense of humour failure then you want to have some head Zumba sessions

Maybe you should have said you thought the film was shitif that's what you meant instead of mentioning inaccuracies. Just a thought.
 
#14
If you read that as being a sense of humour failure then you want to have some head Zumba sessions
I believe it is you who needs to have some head Zumba lessons if you think someone is really going to be outraged about some inaccuracies about a fictional film.

Maybe you should have said you thought the film was shitif that's what you meant instead of mentioning inaccuracies. Just a thought.
I think I did...I quote myself...see the bold.

Be prepared to be disappointed. Oh and outraged at inaccuracies.
Or do you think that me stating that someone should be prepared to be disappointed by watching a film actually means that I am saying I think its a great film.
 
#15
You really are a bitey underpant.

"prepare to be outraged at the inaccuracies" tells me all I needed know about you.

Cock.
 
#17
As I said, you are obviously having a sense of humour failure, if you actually have one which I doubt.
Yeah right. Cos you're famous for your sunny side ain't you sweetheart.

Keep spotting those inaccuracies chuckles.
 

Similar threads

Latest Threads

Top