Fancy ex-laxing the Jobcentre Bonus Easter Eggs ?

Discussion in 'The Intelligence Cell' started by BounceBanana, Mar 27, 2013.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. There are signs that IDS is developing some cunning as he has created 145 vacancies, paying £145 per day, for disabled people to sit on Appeal Tribunals to hear appeals against decisions to stop paying disability benefits.

    "How's about are you fit for work if I puts £145 a day on da effin table den !"

    But here is the quote:

    "In this edition, as the scandal of targets – and even Easter egg prizes - for sanctioning JSA claimants unfolds, we warn that the same tactics will soon be aimed at ESA claimants challenging a decision they are fit for work.

    Staying with appeals, we have news of 145 vacancies for disabled members on DLA and PIP tribunals at a rate of £145 a day. Plus, we look at one website that is urging victims to use the appeals system to fight back against the bedroom tax, due to begin next month.

    We also have the truly pathetic reason why ministers are refusing to meet disabled campaigners, links to the new PIP and universal credit decision makers guidance plus much more news in the members area.

    The news about benefit sanctions is increasingly grim. First, we learn that Labour joined with the coalition in approving fast-track, retrospective legislation (external link) that prevents people on workfare who were illegally sanctioned getting their illegally sanctioned benefits repaid.

    Now, whilst ministers continue to deny it, there is incontrovertible proof that Jobcentre Plus staff are being told they must sanction 5% of JSA claimants or face disciplinary action. One office has allegedly even offered Easter egg prizes (external link) to the team which sanctions the most claimants.

    A leaked letter from Walthamstow Jobcentre (external link) warns staff they will be disciplined if they don’t move their Jobcentre up the sanctions league table by sanctioning 5% of JSA claimants. The letter gives handy hints and tips on how to catch claimants out, including targeting claimants who have shared child custody arrangements. It also explains how to get ‘an easy win’:

    ‘An easy win is a JSD [jobseekers direction]. Set one, if the customer doesn’t comply then action the direction!’

    It’s hard not to wonder whether the DWP, as an institution, even sees claimants as entirely human anymore. Stopping people’s benefits for between 13 weeks and three years has a devastating effect on claimants’ lives and potentially on the wellbeing of small children and disabled dependents as well. For some people, unfair benefits decisions are the last straw that moves them to take their own lives.

    To turn sanctions into a game with chocolate for prizes or to threaten staff with disciplinary action if they don’t meet targets – as if they were selling double glazing rather than destroying lives – is astonishingly cruel and has nothing to do with helping people find work.

    When compulsory reconsideration before appeals begins, pretty much every ESA claimant who is found capable of work and wants to appeal will be forced to claim JSA or starve. We know that around 40% of those who appeal will win, and that a large proportion will be so severely sick or disabled that they will be placed straight into the support group. But before that they may prove very easy targets for the JSA sanctions regime and some of may not survive the experience.

    Labour claim that they supported the retrospective legislation for workfare victims in return for getting an inquiry into sanctions, including targets. As it turns out, there will be an inquiry into sanctions (external link) but it will not look at the use of targets and it will take a year to report back.

    Meanwhile, the head of Jobcentre Plus has already said, before the inquiry even begins, that he believes that the Walthamstow letter was an isolated one, despite the increasing evidence that this is not the case – including a Jobcentre Plus newsletter from Malvern (external link) also threatening disciplinary action if staff don’t meet 5% sanctions targets.

    How many claimants believe for a moment that an inquiry will get to the truth or make the tiniest scrap of difference? And how many claimants will continue to suffer hardship and even death as a result of this vicious regime?

    You can read the leaked letter that began the scandal on the Labour list website (external link)

    The Tribunals Service has finally begun recruiting 145 Disability members for first-tier DLA and PIP tribunals in preparation for the expected surge in appeals once PIP starts to bite. The posts pay £145 a day and appointments last for 5 years. You will need to be prepared to work a minimum of 30 days a year, but there will be the opportunity for ‘significantly more work’.

    According to the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC):

    “You do not need to be legally qualified. You will need to be experienced in dealing with the physical or mental needs of people with disabilities through working with them in a professional or voluntary capacity, as a carer or because you have disabilities.”

    The closing date for applications is 15 April.

    Full details and a downloadable application form are available from the JAC website.

    Coalition ministers are being ridiculed for refusing to speak to the unfunded but highly effective disability rights campaigning group, Spartacus.

    Ministers claim they will not meet with the campaigners because – essentially – they’ve been mean about DWP policies. Ministers have taken particular exception to the following quote from the foreword of a Spartacus report in which the work capability assessment was compared to:

    “the medical tribunals that returned shell shocked and badly wounded soldiers to duty in the first world war or the ‘KV-machine’, the medical commission the Nazis used in the second world war to play down wounds so that soldiers could be reclassified ‘fit for the Eastern front’”

    After the revolting revelation that DWP staff get Easter eggs for forcing claimants into poverty and potentially suicide, why would anyone find this comparison at all surprising, let alone objectionable?"
  2. Might have gammon tonight.
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Please die in pain you cock

    That is all

    Sent by carrier pigeon using Speckled Jim
  4. And the Universal Credit migration chaos is yet to unfold.

    Just a little tip re bedroom tax. Let your bedroom to a pension credit claimant who can then claim to be separated and can stick his or her spouse on the books as a single pension credit claimant. Work it between you folks. IDS only has graduates of social policy advising him.

    For those currently on LHA change your claim in October so you jump the queue to be migrated to Universal Credit and can start stealing the rent money at the earliest opportunity IDS presents.

    Don't worry about bankrupting your landlords, housing assns and councils. There is no such thing as society.

    IDS pay me £145 per day to be your advisor son and I'll put you right.
  5. Maybe with chips.
  6. is it your day for the Foodbank then Jarrod ? I think your mate is feasting on carrier pigeon but didn't fully understand the thrust of his erudite contribution.
  7. Shut up you paranoid, alcoholic cloud of bastard.
  8. I've never been in a Foodbank. Mostly because I'm not a complete failure as a human being and I'm able to provide for my family.
  9. I hope you're having a pineapple ring on top of the gammon
  10. A fried egg probably.
  11. Fish, chips and chinese curry sauce.

    The good stuff, not that brown crap with sultanas.......
  12. EGG! It has to be an egg. The pineapple ring stuff is too reminicent of the ACC's idea of exotica, in some places they even tried cheese on the pineapple ring. Shudders and feels slightly nauseous.
    The sign of a good pub with food is the quality of their ham egg and chips. Fail that and its over.
    • Like Like x 1
  13. Bloody hell retro or what! Berni Inns circa 1972?
  14. sirbhp

    sirbhp LE Book Reviewer

    how about boiled bacon and mushy peas mit over boiled cabbage hmmmm days of my yoof.
  15. Yes I'm with you. Pineapple indeed.