Fancy a quick £4500? Come to the UK and kill our babies

#1
#2
This is exactly why we should bring the death penalty back....

This wasn't fcuking manslaughter, it was murder. End of.
 
#5
I don't do outrage, as a rule.

But reading that, if it's true, has made me feel quite sick. Getting a cheque for £4,500 and only 14 months in gaol, for swinging a kid around, smashing it's skull don't seem right.
 
#6
chocolate_frog said:
This is exactly why we should bring the death penalty back....

This wasn't fcuking manslaughter, it was murder. End of.
Seconded. :evil:

There are times I dispair of this country. :x
 
#7
ffs :twisted:
 
#8
Daily Mail

Just two weeks ago, she was deported to Malaysia under a controversial 'Facilitated Returns Scheme' under which foreign prisoners are paid up to £5,000 if they agree to leave the UK as early as possible without fighting their deportation using human-rights laws or by claiming asylum.

So far, around 1,000 have left the UK and been given the money.
So the Govt accept that asylum & Human Rights laws are being absued. And how do they respond - change the law? Or bribe people not to use the law?

BTW, if £4.5 k is typical, and if 1,000 have used the scheme so far, that means a cost of £4.5m. (And let's face it, now word is out of this woman's payments, criminals who want to use the scheme aren't going to agree to it if they're 'only' offered £2k.) Good job this govt isn't short of cash, otherwise people might start to question whether it could have been better spent.

Another thought - once word gets out about this scheme, is the prospect of £5k an incentive to commit crime? This must be several yrs' wages in some countries, especially the ones whose citizens this scheme is aimed at.
 
#9
Can I suggest somebody does a freedom of information request in the hope of finding out how many of those who are deported actually return.

Then you're heads will really spin off!!!
 
#10
It is truly bizarre that due to reams of legislation from home and european sources, the only way to repatriate alien criminals is:

1. Fudge the charge.

2. Pay them to leave.

Providing of course, that their home country is a safe place to which they may be returned. Otherwise they will stay on at our expense for the rest of their natural lives.

I'm off to write the risk assessment for "banging one's head against a wall" now.

B
 
#11
This both disgusts me and perplexes me.... Im seriously considering buggering off to Canada or Austrailia or anywhere else that hasnt completley joined the funny farm!

IMO death would be too good for this vile slime.... how about permanently disfiguring the cnut and tatooing "baby killer" all over her body and not charging the mob who do her over repeatedly for anything!
 
#12
bakerlite said:
It is truly bizarre that due to reams of legislation from home and european sources, the only way to repatriate alien criminals is:

1. Fudge the charge.

2. Pay them to leave.

Providing of course, that their home country is a safe place to which they may be returned. Otherwise they will stay on at our expense for the rest of their natural lives.

I'm off to write the risk assessment for "banging one's head against a wall" now.

B
That shouldn't even be thought of if they commit a (serios/major) crime. Send them away.
 
#13
This country is starting to make me despair. That sentance was an utter joke, then to give her a bloody Wedge to go away. Sickening truely.
 
#14
AFA06 said:
Does anybody else agree that this country has finally lost it as far as crime control is concerned?

http://www.madnessoftheworld.com/?p=1443
Let me ask a question or two.

Would you prefer Miss Wong to cost the country £4500 or over ten times that to incarcerate her?

Do you agree with sending illegal and convicted immigrants home - how do we do this if we do not pay for them to go home.

Does

". . . she shook or swung Hugo around possibly onto a bed or other soft surface causing him immediately to suffer brain damage from which he died the following day."

equate to

"For someone who deliberately kills someone, say for example by swinging a defenceless baby round by his ankles like a baseball bat until his skull smashes . . . . " ??

(One was the Manchester Evening News, the other a meaningless and inaccurate blog).

I's your blog isn't it :roll:
 
#15
bovvy said:
I don't do outrage, as a rule.

But reading that, if it's true, has made me feel quite sick. Getting a cheque for £4,500 and only 14 months in gaol, for swinging a kid around, smashing it's skull don't seem right.
She was given a cheque for £4500 was she? :roll:


Or did that money pay for two burly individuals to fly to malaysia and back to get rid of her.

AS for the swinging the victim round by his heels - read the quote above for what really happened.
 
#16
Whet said:
AFA06 said:
Does anybody else agree that this country has finally lost it as far as crime control is concerned?

http://www.madnessoftheworld.com/?p=1443
Let me ask a question or two.

Would you prefer Miss Wong to cost the country £4500 or over ten times that to incarcerate her?

Do you agree with sending illegal and convicted immigrants home - how do we do this if we do not pay for them to go home.

Does

". . . she shook or swung Hugo around possibly onto a bed or other soft surface causing him immediately to suffer brain damage from which he died the following day."

equate to

"For someone who deliberately kills someone, say for example by swinging a defenceless baby round by his ankles like a baseball bat until his skull smashes . . . . " ??

(One was the Manchester Evening News, the other a meaningless and inaccurate blog).

I's your blog isn't it :roll:
Meaningless, of course, inaccurate, no.

I hate to disagree with you but when quoting the Manchester Evening News, in future make sure you quote the one from after the case was proven, not the one reporting the opening speech of the prosecution at the start of the trial:

Manchester Crown Court was told that Wong, who was paid £120 a week to look after Hugo, picked him up by his ankles and flung him against either a bed or a settee.
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/s/1034654_baby_killer_convicted
 
#17
Don't be a dick Whet.

If she swung the lad with sufficient force to cause fatal brain damage, how hard must she have been throwing him to cause such injuries on a soft, fluffy bed?

You are merely dancing around the issue.

According to the Telegraph (Torygraph), Daily Mail (Daily Hate), The Liverpool Echo AND the Guardian wong was given a "voucher" for £4,500 to help her get her life back on track.

Ergo, a fcuking cheque in any langauge. Or, in my mind, a REWARD for killing a child. She didn't have to pay this voucher to the 'escorts' she may or may not have had.

In reality, she should have been put on the plane and fcuked off, with a leaflet written in her own langauge (the one document I wouldn't begrudge paying for translation) explaining that she would be shot on sight, should she ever soil our fair nation again.
 
#18
chocolate_frog said:
Don't be a dick Whet.

If she swung the lad with sufficient force to cause fatal brain damage, how hard must she have been throwing him to cause such injuries on a soft, fluffy bed?

You are merely dancing around the issue.

According to the Telegraph (Torygraph), Daily Mail (Daily Hate), The Liverpool Echo AND the Guardian wong was given a "voucher" for £4,500 to help her get her life back on track.

Ergo, a fcuking cheque in any langauge. Or, in my mind, a REWARD for killing a child. She didn't have to pay this voucher to the 'escorts' she may or may not have had.

In reality, she should have been put on the plane and fcuked off, with a leaflet written in her own langauge (the one document I wouldn't begrudge paying for translation) explaining that she would be shot on sight, should she ever soil our fair nation again.
You have the relevent articles tohand - preferably the Guardian? Post it and I'll wind my neck in about that part of it.
 
#20
bomb_mac said:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1227871/Fury-immigrant-baby-killer-paid-4-500-bribe-quit-Britain.html

Forgive me, but I trust the Daily Mail as far as I can sh1t. At a pinch I will accept the Torygraph or the daily Echo
 

Similar threads

Latest Threads