Army Rumour Service

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Fancy a bit of Ginger? NSFW

Ginger eyebrows? Or just wishful thinking? I'd love to check!

1603399209267.png


Found with an image search of the pic in the previous post.
 
yep. It’s got to go
I don't have a dog in this fight and she is not my type, but I also don't get your point at all.

She is verifiably old enough, meets some people's idea of attractive and looks like she makes the photos willingly. However, you don't like it so 'it's got to go'.

There are some truly horrific, fat, minging munters on these threads that serve only to trigger my gag reflex (I'm sure many others feel the same). I have still yet to see anyone insisting that they 'have to go', just because they object to their presence.
 
If you look at the videos of her on Pornhub (sadly not pornographic), there is one where she sticks her tongue out: it's fuuuucking huuuge! :)

What search term would I need to tell my friend to avoid entering on this hub thing you speak of?
 
I don't have a dog in this fight and she is not my type, but I also don't get your point at all.

She is verifiably old enough, meets some people's idea of attractive and looks like she makes the photos willingly. However, you don't like it so 'it's got to go'.

There are some truly horrific, fat, minging munters on these threads that serve only to trigger my gag reflex (I'm sure many others feel the same). I have still yet to see anyone insisting that they 'have to go', just because they object to their presence.

She’s 17 apparently.

I’m with @Simmerit on this. I think there should be an 18+ age limit on all such threads, to stop us inadvertently sliding into nonceland.
 
She’s 17 apparently.

I’m with @Simmerit on this. I think there should be an 18+ age limit on all such threads, to stop us inadvertently sliding into nonceland.
True. Under 18's with their knockers out are verboten most places, and suggestive or sexually-posed pictures of Under 18's are a walk in that direction. It's a no from me.

*Pushes reactolites up bridge of nose and centres buckle of belt with Gerber on it in authoritative manner*
 
She’s 17 apparently.

I’m with @Simmerit on this. I think there should be an 18+ age limit on all such threads, to stop us inadvertently sliding into nonceland.
A good point but putting up an arbitrary age will not stop underage getting through. Many a "young" girl can look or made to look a lot older than they really are. I think this needs a different metric. As with this one, if they look like nonce material, don't post them.
 
A good point but putting up an arbitrary age will not stop underage getting through. Many a "young" girl can look or made to look a lot older than they really are. I think this needs a different metric. As with this one, if they look like nonce material, don't post them.

I don’t think 18 is arbitrary from our point of view. But I also agree that anything that looks like nonce material shouldn’t be posted, regardless of age.
 
A good point but putting up an arbitrary age will not stop underage getting through. Many a "young" girl can look or made to look a lot older than they really are. I think this needs a different metric. As with this one, if they look like nonce material, don't post them.
I think if it's borderline then err on the side of caution and don't post.
It only takes ONE image of a lass who's a tad young to appear and the excrement will have an interface with the air conditioning.

We know journos prowl ARRSE, can you imagine the headline

"Vile military paedophile website" etc etc. Be on the safe side and don't post if it's in doubt.
 
I don't have a dog in this fight and she is not my type, but I also don't get your point at all.

She is verifiably old enough, meets some people's idea of attractive and looks like she makes the photos willingly. However, you don't like it so 'it's got to go'.

There are some truly horrific, fat, minging munters on these threads that serve only to trigger my gag reflex (I'm sure many others feel the same). I have still yet to see anyone insisting that they 'have to go', just because they object to their presence.
Looks like a child, dresses like a child. That's my problem.
 
I don’t think 18 is arbitrary from our point of view. But I also agree that anything that looks like nonce material shouldn’t be posted, regardless of age.
18 is good but the point I was making is that it is of little value when so many young girls look so much older.

On the other side, over 18's having to produce ID in pubs because they look much younger shows "18" to really work.

I suppose we could get the ARRSE massive to arbitrate with a ""You're a nonce, no, you're a nonce" thread.
 

Sexton Blake

War Hero
images.jpg
 
18 is good but the point I was making is that it is of little value when so many young girls look so much older.

On the other side, over 18's having to produce ID in pubs because they look much younger shows "18" to really work.

I suppose we could get the ARRSE massive to arbitrate with a ""You're a nonce, no, you're a nonce" thread.
I dont find 18 year old girls that attractive, they are still children mentally , I`d set the bar at 25 years and older for lechery.
 

Latest Threads

Top