Families of killed UK soldiers launch party

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by armchair_jihad, Aug 5, 2006.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:


  1. More than 70 candidates to contest Labour seats

    Whenever news of British military deaths in the Middle East flashes on to their TV screen, Reg and Sally Keys become silent and you can see anxiety wash across their faces.

    The Keys are among 115 families whose sons have been killed in Iraq. But this week, one of the worst for British casualties, has been different for the bereaved; this week, they have been doing something about it.

    Mr Keys took 4,252 votes in Sedgefield - 10.3% of the vote. Now he believes similar results up and down the country could cost Labour ministers their seats.

    He will stand, as will Rose Gentle. Her 19-year-old son, Gordon, was killed in a roadside bombing in Basra in 2004. She uses a website, www.mfaw.org.uk (Military Families Against the War) to encourage bereaved families to come forward and make a stand.

    "I'm getting between 200 and 300 emails a day from bereaved families, concerned military families and serving soldiers who all feel angry at the way we have been lied to," she says. "This movement is growing and by forming a political party we'll have a focus of that anger."


    Article in full

    http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,,1837762,00.html
     
  2. DPM

    DPM Old-Salt

    If any of my family did this, I'd turn in my grave. My choice to serve...

    dpm
     
  3. Its so difficult to judge people in their position.
     
  4. OK. By that measure, you're just cannon fodder - there to be exploited and disposed of as required - and it's therefore pointless questioning orders, justification for war, or protesting about the hypocrisy of politicians.


    I'll assume you've never been on here to complain about your political masters' treatment of the forces
     
  5. You really are a class kn0b who obviously has never served. If you had, you would understand DPMs sentiments.
     
  6. I have served, for 7 years, but I came to terms with it and didn't let it define me
     
  7. French Person..
    You are a fool as well as a troll
    Where did you serve?... as a waiter in the mess?
     
  8. Frenchperson,

    It was my choice to don the uniform of my country and serve. I'm proud of both the time in the army and considered it an honour and a privledge to serve with some of the finest men and women that I could ever meet.

    You comment on cannon fodder is ill timed and shows a lack of thought for those who choose to serve. I personally think that you are a tool of the first order and should retract the remark soonest!

    I probably am not the only one who takes offence to your comments. Think before posting!


    fastmedic
     
  9. I will not be retracting that remark. It's a considered comment made specifically to somebody who said the actions of a grieving family would cause him to turn in his grave. Free speech is still allowed (except for a small area around the Houses of Parliament) in this country and the voice of grieving families should be listened to. It particularly applies in this case as the invasion of Iraq is now regarded across the globe as the start of an illegal war. If you're in the forces FM, the Prime Minister won't be listening to your concerns, whatever they are - that's guaranteed. But he'd better listen to the voice of the civilian population or he or his successor will be dumped.
     
  10. No matter what sentiment or idea is behind the formation of a political party I feel it will do very little other than gain a little publicity. But there are plenty of other ways to do that. The voting public aren't interested in polarized single issue parties. To get anything other than a small protest vote such a party needs a much broarder spectrum with real policies on all the subjects that the public have views on, not just one.
     
  11. Having served, and my son is about to, I am uncomforatable with turning the natural grief at the loss of a loved one, into a political issue. It seems to demean their memory.

    Maybe other people see it differently.
     
  12. Very difficult - DPM quite rightly makes the point that when you join up you can't pick and choose which wars you serve in.

    However a lot of people (I'm not one of them) think that we were wrong to assist America in her invasion of Iraq, were lied to about the reasons for the invasion, and therefore feel that the loss of their loved ones was a waste. They want to hit out at the Government in a tangible way - I can't fault them for fighting for what they believe in.
     
  13. I echo what RABC says, but would go further.

    This type of action also dishonours their dead soldiers memory, their service and most of all their sacrifice. If my parents had behaved in such a way i would have come back and haunted them
     
  14. Mr Keys and Mrs Gentle are entitled to their opinions, I agree, sign up, do as your required to do....... Forming Political Parties is fab... so they get in, what changes NOTHING, a waste of time and energy and no lasting memory to those they lost
     
  15. I haven't served. But I will. I have been to RSC, and rather coincidently when we were collectively spoken to by one of the Officers (I'm rather bad at remembering ranks, I'll take a stab at Major), he said almost exactly what Frenchie has just said.

    Something along the lines of; 'It will never be your place to question the reasons why, or to get involved in politics. You will be a tool of the Government to use at their disposal.'

    Thinking about it, he may have been saying it in light of the current climate and letting us young men know exactly what we will be letting ourselves in for.