I was just perusing a certain website of a more adult persuasion and for one of many numerous reasons found myself in a section dealing solely with 'strap-on' sex. Now I have no aversion to observing as a doris straps 10-in of hardened latex on and then proceeds to pound it in and out of another doris, but when expecting to see this I suddenly found myself thinking, "hmm, she's got a bit of a hairy, spotty arse.... OH SH1T! AND A COFFEE TABLE*!!!" In hindsight I realise that the fact 'the shim' had a tongue like a komodo dragon should have given the game away. Now my question is, that given this was not classified as tranny, chicks-with-d1cks, gay, bi, etc. etc. can I now slam them with a lawsuit (americano style) citing psychological distress resulting from false classification/advertising? Advice from the ARRSE legal bods/perverts (you know who you are) would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. * - Ref. 'Weeds' conversation- Andy (and Doug): "What do you call the thing between the d1ck and the asshole?" Lupita (the maid): "The coffee table.".