Exiting Iraq: Strategies for Bush

Discussion in 'Multinational HQ' started by Goatman, Dec 6, 2005.

?
  1. Coalition boots on the ground for the next 5 years

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. CinC got it right - progressive handover no timetable

    45.5%
  3. Stay put until the hajjis are all dead

    9.1%
  4. Enough: progressive withdrawal,shoulder to shoulder, starting NOW

    18.2%
  5. I own shares in Halliburton - why should we leave ?

    27.3%

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Goatman

    Goatman LE Book Reviewer

    Thought this might be of interest:

    Story from BBC NEWS:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/world/americas/4484736.stm

    Published: 2005/11/30 14:02:29 GMT
    By Paul Reynolds
    BBC News website world affairs correspondent
    Paul.Reynolds-INTERNET@bbc.co.uk



    Le Chevre
    [​IMG]

    PS - US pers can buy this shirt Stateside 8) - UK pers check http://www.arrse.co.uk/cpgn2/Forums/viewtopic/p=473300.html#473300 -
     
  2. Doesn't really shout "We are in control!" as an IS tactic does it?"
     
  3. Goatman

    Goatman LE Book Reviewer

    Interesting to note the praise lavished on the Brit SHAR contingent in Afghanistan lately in this context....I get the feeling that US Army pers were pleasurably surprised by having available air assets who would ' bust down doors' on call, on task , on TIME and ON TARGET at the flick of a pressel switch......it's damn all use half an hour after the blackhats have left the village.....

    One of the comments by Robert MacNamara in his recent retrospectives re Vietnam was to the effect that the Air Chiefs THEN had too much credence and the US Army/Navy didn't want to undermine their argument by dissenting from the view that Air power alone would achieve results..........hmmmmm......

    Ave, Bossa Nova ! (Similis Bossa Seneca)