paddyplanty
LE
Noticed some comments on Guido earlier thst not only had Tommy Robinson been arrested but also actually imprisoned. I can't find these comments any longer so can't do a link.
However, their comments suggested this was more politically motivated and disproportionate rather than for any actual offence.
'is he imprisoned as a political dissident' and 'where's Shami?' were two of the comments that interested me.
Now I appreciate opinions are divided about him, my own opinion is that he's more sinned against than sinner (even though he may invite it) so I'm not asking whether Arrse are pro or anti the man - ISTR @Boumer making some pertinent comments somewhere.
I'm off for a quick Google as it seems to be a low priority story but I'm curious. Having seen the recent Steve Bannon/Emily Maitlis interview and Nigel Garage asking Mark Zuckerberg about who decides what content is allowed/suppressed on FB.
Is the reaction to Tommy Robinson's latest escapade completely justifiable or is it a stumbling lurch at attacking free speech?
However, their comments suggested this was more politically motivated and disproportionate rather than for any actual offence.
'is he imprisoned as a political dissident' and 'where's Shami?' were two of the comments that interested me.
Now I appreciate opinions are divided about him, my own opinion is that he's more sinned against than sinner (even though he may invite it) so I'm not asking whether Arrse are pro or anti the man - ISTR @Boumer making some pertinent comments somewhere.
I'm off for a quick Google as it seems to be a low priority story but I'm curious. Having seen the recent Steve Bannon/Emily Maitlis interview and Nigel Garage asking Mark Zuckerberg about who decides what content is allowed/suppressed on FB.
Is the reaction to Tommy Robinson's latest escapade completely justifiable or is it a stumbling lurch at attacking free speech?