Dress in the Field and Ranges

Discussion in 'The Training Wing' started by BuggerAll, Jun 20, 2005.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. BuggerAll

    BuggerAll LE Reviewer Book Reviewer

    Can any one give me a definative answer on what the correct dress is on the ranges and in the field? A lot of people feel that it is necessary to wear a smock in the field or on the ranges but PAM 21 says dress for the ranges is CS95. Again and again I hear people insisting that shooters wear a smock instead of a jacket (as the shirt is correctly called).

    I've even heard an officer boasting that his unit were running around in Gib in 40c in smocks. Quite why he was proud of this I'm not sure. I'm quite sure its b....

    Having watched a number of soldiers collapse yesterday including 1 who had to be blue lighted off the training area I think it come close to criminal that thye are being forced to wear unsuitable clothing.
  2. maninblack

    maninblack LE Book Reviewer

    Any officer or NCO with one ounce of common sense would realise that the correct dress is dictated not by PAM21 but by the conditions.

    There are no rules that over rule common sense.

    If the tests mandate a dress and no variation and the weather is unaccaptable then the OC Situation is wrong to carry on training in that situation.
  3. BuggerAll

    BuggerAll LE Reviewer Book Reviewer

    MiB I agree with what you are saying. Common sense would suggest to me that when its 30C + then a smock is not the appropiate dress. But so many people insist that they should to be worn in the field regardless of the conditions. Shades of red tunics and stocks on the Spainish Peninsular or red wooly jackets in Africa.

    As I've stated before the only thing it says on dress in PAM21 is CS95. Which includes the jacket (shirt), smock, and waterproof as outer wear. Can anybody come up with a definative ruling on what is the correct dress - preferably with evidence that I can quote next time I need to.
  4. cpunk

    cpunk LE Moderator

    That seems reasonable: CS95 is a modular, layered clothing system and I don't see any issue in wearing the 'jacket' without a smock in the field or on the ranges. I'd suggest anyone who is telling you different is a bit thick.
  5. Rules are there for the guidance of the wise and obeyance by the stupid.

    How often is it proved the officer who is employed for his intellect and leadership and an NCO who is promoted because of the same use so little of it. What sort of a kn0b has solidiers running round in 40c heat in a smock???? It proves only one thing and that's that the officer who nade the decision is too much of a coward to use his common sense. Irespective of what the pamphlet says common sense should be applied. A man who has several soldiers go down with heat exhaustion including one blue light case should be investigated and if necessary court martialled. If a soldier is proven to have been on the p1ss the night before a pre-planned physical activity and susequently goes down then when comes out of hospital he should be court mashalled too.

    An ability to conduct battle drill in hot weather is not improved by weraing a smock whilst training, it's improved by being fitter and having good personal administration.
  6. I'm pretty sure that if a civilian employer caused staff to collapse then the H&SE would be on them like a ton of bricks.

    The Exercise OC should be reminded that Crown Immunity has long gone.
  7. BuggerAll

    BuggerAll LE Reviewer Book Reviewer

    I've had this arguament several times - At the event in question there was a 2 star and a 1 star and f@ck knows how many Full and half Colonels all watching.

    Every time I bring up this subject I get told to wind my neck in. Which is why I'm asking for a definative answer so that I can ram it up the @rses of the sort of t@sser who encorages or allows it to go on.
  8. RCO is King for the Day, regardless of rank.

    And I, for one, couldn't agree more.

    Favourite argument in support of full gear is that you should practice wearing what you will have on in a real fire-fight. I prefer the alternative view that we are building up the individual's confidence in the weapon system first and working on his combat skills second. It doesn't actually work the other way around.
  9. I always assumed (the mother of all fcuk ups!) that it was down to the individual. If one man feels comfortable wearing a norgie under his combat shirt/jacket and another does not then who is to say which one is correct?

    "Get that fcukin' norgie on soldier"
    "But I'm over-heating boss"
    "I dont give a fcuk, get it on"

    "NEE, NAW, NEE, NAW............"

    Interview without coffee me thinks.
  10. cpunk

    cpunk LE Moderator

    Well yes, though my experience is that advance notice and dress instructions are rarely given for firefights. Anyway, I would suggest that in the current operational situation, it's far more likely that someone is going to be wearing their 'shirt' rather than a smock if they have to open fire.
  11. I would suggest that JSP 539 - Climatic Injuries in the Armed Forces: Prevention & Treatment would be a good place to look. Just 'cos you're on the range doesn't mean that Pam 21 is the only relevant publication re: safety. Sounds dead boring, but it's a useful stick to batter people with when they're being kn*bs.
  12. maninblack

    maninblack LE Book Reviewer

    Ask them if they would like to discuss it with the Health & Safety Executive?

    They may tell you that your attitude will affect your career but so does being dead when the lipids in your brain exceed their operating temperture. Can anyone remember the Royal Navy killing a couple of blokes by making them run across mudflats in dry suits and wooly bears in the late 80s?
  13. BuggerAll

    BuggerAll LE Reviewer Book Reviewer

    PAM21 says CS95 which as I read it means either a jacket (shirt), smock, or rainproof. PAM21 appears to be on my side. 'm going to get JSP 539 and have a look.
  14. Pam 21 does indeed say CS95.

    It also says that personnel should fire wearing Body Armour where issued this is in order for the individual to practice shooting in the equipment he is likely to be wearing at times of war.

    I was running a range last week in Essex @ 32 degrees and as i was the RCO said bollox to the body armour and ditch smocks / jackets minimum required 95 shirt with sleeves rolled down.

    To many people out there willing to quote the Pam rather than have the balls to stand there and say bollox as long as my range is safe the lads can wear what i think is suitable for the day.
  15. BuggerAll

    BuggerAll LE Reviewer Book Reviewer

    I think I've identified the problem. PAM21 says that CS95 is the dress for the ranges. To me that means the Lightweight Jacket (ie the shirt) is suitable.

    Everyone else here has agreed with its suitability, but seem to assume that PAM21 means a smock when it says CS95.

    When ever I run a range or run trg the dress is CS95 - up to the individual whether its Lightweight Jacket, smock, waterproof or windproof, but too often I come across people who are insisting on smocks being worn - the given reason being that they think thats how it should be.

    One Trg Offr told me that it was to 'provide protection' and that the lightweight Jacket was barrack dress only. He then boasted that his unit had been training in Gib in 40C in smocks.