Last time I had a good stranglewank, I was still able to speak.
Thank you, for your opinion on the issue.
Not even American police are that silly.
Are they![]()
Objection, my client was in the bath and just giving it a vigorous wash your honour.Explaining yourself when the cleaner caught you ?
There’s a guy called Dr Martin Tobin who’s a leading recognised medical expert on the human pulmonary system who has quite convincingly shown the court with visual aids and accompanying expert testimony how the restraint treatment used on Floyd restricted and then cut off the oxygen leading to Floyd‘s death.
It kind of pretty much kicks your claim that the drugs killed Floyd into touch. It’s a well known fact that Floyd was a drug user. They didn’t kill him though according to expert testimony.
Don't be silly. He had visual aids and everything. It's a slam dunk for the prosecution.There’s a misunderstanding there that I think is common when people have been exposed to the British system, whereby generally expert witnesses are independent & impartial (indeed very often the expert witness gets mutually agreed by prosecution and defence prior to commissioning expert reports)
The US system has a lot more use of prosecution and defence witnesses offering different opinions
Martin Tobin is undoubtedly an expert witness, but he was a prosecution expert witness, not an independent expert witness, therefore MRDA
Don't be silly. He had visual aids and everything. It's a slam dunk for the prosecution.
Well how do you explain having an orange placed in two orifices ?Objection, my client was in the bath and just giving it a vigorous wash your honour.
The first orange was a snack and he was saving the second for later.Well how do you explain having an orange placed in two orifices ?
Er, my client thought it was soap and having placed it in the bath accidentally sat on it and it slipped up the offending passage.Well how do you explain having an orange placed in two orifices ?
Then why were they not classified as SBR's when the pistol brace was invented in 2012? These are not whiz bang new items, they have been around for almost a decade with millions in circulation?No worries, I like guns as much as the next guy, but at least be honest about it, you don't call a garden spade a 'hand trowel with support' do you.
Short barrelled rifles is what they are, short barrelled rifles should be how they're classified.
Anything is else is gratuitous self delusion because it fits the narrative.
I saw that, or a very similar interview, and as no evidence for that claim was presented or asked for, I had a look for myself. This is what I turned up. In 10 years there were 164 deaths involving the Police. 141 white, 13 black, 10 others. Hardly a killing every day.There was a young British girl interviewed on the BBC recently, she stated that -
‘We have to protest as young men are being killed by the police EVERY DAY in this country’
Oddly enough, the BBC reporter didn’t ask her to substantiate her statement
The objective facts are the Doctor said from the final words and dying was 5 seconds and assuming the average for holding someone down in that position is probably at least five minutes and Floyds additional drug consumption was kicking in around the 5th Minute of the hold, Chauvin had a window of perhaps 2 minutes according to the doctor to do something before he expired/slipped into a coma around minute 7.Autopsy said drug overdose. So....
The doctor with his pet theory is simply wrong.
Then why were they not classified as SBR's when the pistol brace was invented in 2012? These are not whiz bang new items, they have been around for almost a decade with millions in circulation?
Some expert testimony.
When the defence wheel out their tame Dr, will you be saying look the nice Dr, showed some lovely pictures that kicks the neck compression theory into touch, he OD'd. Will you be agreeing with his expert testimony?
Chauvin had a window of perhaps 2 minutes according to the doctor to do something before he expired/slipped into a coma around minute 7.
As said before, the entire prosecution case comes down to two minutes. The 5th minute of the video the doctor says he was struggling to breath and the doctor has no interest in what happened before Floyd was placed on the ground and neither does the state.Chauvin's job was to sort out the mess the two rookie cops had left by restraining him. He'd called an ambulance and noone in their right minds would expect him to give CPR etc to a crim during a pandemic. Especially not one built like a brick shit house.
Manslaughter charge might well be appropriate for his drug dealer, though he's likely black so immune from criticism.
If Floyd didn't want to be in a restraining position he could simply not have resisted arrest. If he was having genuine difficulties due to the cocktail of drugs he could have told the hoccifers such.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. If it had been the hispanic or black cop leading the restraining noone would have heard of this nonsense.
Chauvin knew that kneeling on someone’s neck for a sustained period whilst that subject was cuffed and the threat level greatly decreased was uncalled for and went against his training. It doesn’t matter what went on before hand, most coppers have been assaulted by a person they went on to detain, it does not matter one jot what went on before.The objective facts are the Doctor said from the final words and dying was 5 seconds and assuming the average for holding someone down in that position is probably at least five minutes and Floyds additional drug consumption was kicking in around the 5th Minute of the hold, Chauvin had a window of perhaps 2 minutes according to the doctor to do something before he expired/slipped into a coma around minute 7.
My point, is Chauvin didn't know any of this and I would imagine the neck/shoulder hold can be applied beyond five minutes and hence no set standard. Irrespective, Chauvin was negligent not to take his knee away when Floyd stopped struggling(unconscious/dead) and for the final two minutes a mistake has him on trial on charges which are significantly beyond reasonable and is little more than a show trial.