Deliberately doing nothing morally identical to doing something

Discussion in 'The Science Forum' started by Excognito, May 1, 2011.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Evolution and Human Behaviour

    The omission effect in moral cognition: toward a functional explanation

    Peter DeSciolia[​IMG][​IMG], Rebecca Brueningb, Robert Kurzbanb

    Received 20 May 2010; accepted 17 January 2011. published online 31 March 2011.

    Moral judgment involves much more than computations of the expected consequences of behavior. A prime example of the complexity of moral thinking is the frequently replicated finding that violations by omission are judged less morally wrong than violations by commission, holding intentions constant. Here we test a novel hypothesis: Omissions are judged less harshly because they produce little material evidence of wrongdoing. Evidence is crucial because moral accusations are potentially very costly unless supported by others. In our experiments, the omission effect was eliminated when physical evidence showed that an omission was chosen. Perpetrators who “opted out” by pressing a button that would clearly have no causal effects on the victim, rather than rescuing them, were judged as harshly as perpetrators who directly caused death. These results show that, to reduce condemnation, omissions must not only be noncausal, they must also leave little or no material evidence that a choice was made.
  2. I am guilty of deliberately not raping babies.... lock me up and throw away the key eh?

    Or maybe we are all guilty for not selling our homes and sending the cash to Gaza?

    Doing nothing when it's possible to do something is not so bad when one compensates with practical realities... If doing nothing deliberately causes harm, then there's a problem.
  3. rampant

    rampant LE Reviewer Book Reviewer

    Woof, woof!!
  4. I'll come back to this after I've read it and "understood" it :)
  5. I am at a loose end this afternoon. Think I'll just chill out and do nothing. That's me in the crap again then.
  6. Food for the God botherers.

    Hmph, as if they needed any scraps to justify their existences. *shakes head and walks away muttering*
  7. Luke 10:25-37.
  8. Cogi...what a sickening reference to provide for showing pity on another person... Because jesus said!

    We all have the capacity for empathy regardless of religious rubbish. It comes from evolution not from a garbled book. Generousity is also 'built in'... The experience and self satisfaction from giving has nothing to do with christianity.

    What else have you got?
  9. You need psychiatric help, Higgs_Bosun; your anti-theist stance is clearly having a deliterious affect upon you. There is nothing sickening about it at all to a rational mind. There are at least two sides to most human responses as the parable makes clear. As well as the capacity to help, we all have the capacity to hurt and to place our own interests before those of others. And we all (except you, of course) need food for thought to look at alternatives and/or set our minds straight as to which is the better/best/least-bad way to act/think - and that's what the parable provides and that is what it is intended to do rather than be a simple proscription.
  10. I'll take all the help I can get to defeat religious fundamentalism like yours Cogi... Your mentality breeds the extremism that has destroyed our freedom and security in a modern world. Your thinking is geared to a primitive doctrine that has no place in society.

    One does not need fictional parables, convoluted, contradicted and subject to ranting interpretations by the deluded to describe human behavior. How we treat our fellow human beings should form part of a secular curriculum in schools and the emphasis must be on what nature provides. The implications for abusing our role in a community must be subject to the rule of law, respect for life and conscience, in that order... not fear of superstition and ridiculous "alternatives".

    If you can't see the sense in this then clearly you are the one deleterious and irrational. Get cured soon FFS...
  11. Good. I shall add you to my prayer list immediately. The sooner you see your GP and get referred the better for you.

    Fuller response posted here.
  12. What happened to your reasoning? You are clearly running back to the wooden pews in despair because you can't match reality with myths... your faith has failed you and it shows.
  13. Could you please restrict all personal comments to the designated thread rather than clutter up what was intended to be a serious thread in the Science forum? Thank you.
  14. As you were clearly intending to draw attention to the 'jesus said morality' from a completely non scientific POV... I challenge you to address my valid points on the subject before creating another one of your diversions into bible punching.
  15. Can the pair of you just not **** off to chat, or PM each other? Or is that too clever for the both of you?