Army Rumour Service

Register a free account today to join our community
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site, connect with other members through your own private inbox and will receive smaller adverts!

Dedicated Russian thread

It remains ‘highly likely’ unless the two ‘slush averse goons’ surrender to the warrants
The 2 GRU hitmen that arrived in location 3hrs after the Skripals had already left for the day?
The 2 GRU hitmen that had their mugs pinged on the same CCTV system that didn't pick up the Skripals once?
The same 2 GRU hitmen that have no actual evidence against them unless you count circumstantial as evidence?
The same 2 GRU hitmen that luckily come from a country that has no extradition treaty in place?

I could go on.

You know full well there's no evidence, proof or facts in who did what to the Skripals.
There never has been but the UK blamed Russia before the investigation even started.

And it's been all downhill from there.

Just another example of the II doing it's work psyoping the UK public (that still don't buy it).

 
The 2 GRU hitmen that arrived in location 3hrs after the Skripals had already left for the day?
The 2 GRU hitmen that had their mugs pinged on the same CCTV system that didn't pick up the Skripals once?
The same 2 GRU hitmen that have no actual evidence against them unless you count circumstantial as evidence?
The same 2 GRU hitmen that luckily come from a country that has no extradition treaty in place?

I could go on.

You know full well there's no evidence, proof or facts in who did what to the Skripals.

The two who had also been to Salisbury the day before
What evidence do you have that the Skripals ‘left for the day’ before the two returned. Yes they did leave the house before the train arrived, but not without the possibility of returning. (Have you forgotten about how upset you were when you realized that nobody had told you before their return had been mentioned on TV?)

Skripals not on CCTV? The 2 Russians are suspects and their pictures have been published accordingly. The police aren’t looking for the Skripals.
But it’s not true to state that cctv has not been shown of the skripals

Blah blah blah - evidence has not been published.
Though you do realise that circumstantial evidence tends to be how leads begin?
No evidence seen by the OPCW?
‘Luckily’ no extradition treaty? For who?


You’re now going to say things like the evidence doesn’t come out in court because there won’t be a case brought to court etc
 
You have the means to find that out for yourself.

You are the source of this . You should engage and provide evidence. As usual, you fail to back up a ream of cut and paste. for your latest hobby horse.

This latest of your incarnations is not worth discussion because you won't.
 
The 2 GRU hitmen that arrived in location 3hrs after the Skripals had already left for the day?
The 2 GRU hitmen that had their mugs pinged on the same CCTV system that didn't pick up the Skripals once?
The same 2 GRU hitmen that have no actual evidence against them unless you count circumstantial as evidence?
The same 2 GRU hitmen that luckily come from a country that has no extradition treaty in place?

I could go on.

You know full well there's no evidence, proof or facts in who did what to the Skripals.
There never has been but the UK blamed Russia before the investigation even started.

And it's been all downhill from there.

Just another example of the II doing it's work psyoping the UK public (that still don't buy it).


All of that discussed on the relevant threads
 
Now THAT is a Russian Bear, Pooty Poot will be so upset you caught him en femme
Odd how our Soviet trolls never respond to the gay Putin images. It's almost as if they fear having a tragic accident from a 10th floor balcony if they do.
1547797981989.png
 
So you knew all about OP IRIS?
What 77X, II and IfS were up to wasn't known about till the hack.


Anyone, as long as it's Russia appears to be your's.

Show me the proof vs Ru, even though, now HMG has been caught out pulling the wool (again) sort of takes a massive steaming dump on their less-than-sparkling international reputation....again....and nobody should believe a word that comes out of their hole.

View attachment 372549

View attachment 372550

With posts like yours, we can see why something like the Integrity Initiative is needed.

You, conspiraloon and propaganda websites, supposed news outlets and opinion sites take different bits of information and conflate them out of context and give them a false narrative.
 
Were you aware of an FCO-funded JV involving gov/int/media to push public opinion against assorted entities?
Foreign and Commonwealth Office: Integrity Initiative:Written question - 196177

Screwing over the:

The Russian state.
Leader of the govt's Opposition.
Meddling in the US elections.
Interference in other countries' elections?
Briefing note on the Integrity Initiative

I had no idea that the British were nefariously and actively doing exactly what they were accusing the Russians of.

It's not a surprise that it's not being publicised, eh?

No, it's not a surprise, primarily because it's cobblers and the "clusters" were a fantasy that Integrity Initiative cooked up to get their FCO funding - and all the real journalists have found this out which just leaves RT, Sputnik etc. banging on about it. Plus, of course, their troll farm hordes. The amount of effort you and others are putting into this is a good indication that the Russians are really annoyed they couldn't get this to stick.

Anyway, *plink*
 
Odd how our Soviet trolls never respond to the gay Putin images. It's almost as if they fear having a tragic accident from a 10th floor balcony if they do.
Why they should? In fact you do their job - advertising Putin image, but in slightly different 'target group'. Patriots image Putin as a patriot, liberals - as a liberal, socialists as a socialist, capitalists - as a capitalist, warmongers - as a warmonger, pacifists - as a pacifist, crooks and thiefs see his as a crook and thief, and gays see him as a gay.
So, it is more about you, not him.
 
Why they should? In fact you do their job - advertising Putin image, but in slightly different 'target group'. Patriots image Putin as a patriot, liberals - as a liberal, socialists as a socialist, capitalists - as a capitalist, warmongers - as a warmonger, pacifists - as a pacifist, crooks and thiefs see his as a crook and thief, and gays see him as a gay.
So, it is more about you, not him.

So you labelling the west as degenerates tells us what?
 
So you labelling the west as degenerates tells us what?
No. You are labelling yourself as degenerates, posting in the 'seriouse' thread such pictures and statements.
Normal people appreciate state leaders for their work (first of all for the raise of wealth and safety), not for their sexuality.
 
Top