Debunking the 9/11 *Anti-No-Plane-Theory* Myths

Discussion in 'The ARRSE Hole' started by CB_Brooklyn, Mar 22, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Debunking the 9/11 *Anti-No-Plane-Theory* Myths

    by CB_Brooklyn

    (mirrored @

    From the moment people thought that planes crashed in the World Trade Center, the brainwashing had begun.

    The “official” account of Boeing 767s striking the North and South Towers, at 400+MPH and 500+MPH respectively, became glued in peoples’ minds as “fact” because of the “tee-vee”. Good ol’ tee-vee. We all trust the media.

    Even in 1938, when Orson Welles directed a special Halloween radio broadcast of the novel “War of the Worlds”, millions of Americans believed Martians were invading earth. Everyone trusts the media! (As a side note, I’d like to advertise a new article by Andrew Johnson: “Mars Anomalies”)

    It should come to no surprise how the media affects peoples’ minds and our culture, and the media’s reporting of 9/11 is no exception.

    The 9/11 coverup perpetrators had their deceptive propaganda well planned. With their total control over the media they successfully conditioned most into believing their “19 boxcutter-wielding Muslims” story. People were overwhelmed; their brains saturated with the propaganda.

    November 10, 2001 - George W Bush brainwashes the world into thinking the idea of “inside job” is crazy: ”Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th; malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists, themselves, away from the guilty.”

    But the propaganda didn’t stop there. The coverup perps, the experts they are, knew some people would see through their “boxcutter” deception, so they crafted an alternate propaganda… specifically targeting those already suspicious of the “official” story.

    Lenin, the first Communist dictator after the takeover of Russia in 1917, is widely credited with the following quotation, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."

    This alternate propaganda is promoted by government plants within the “truth movement”, along with its fabricated evidence (such as molten metal). Of course, the media carefully publicize this “evidence” as a “wacky conspiracy theory”…

    November 14, 2005 - Tucker Carlson brainwashes the world into thinking the idea of an “inside job” theory is offensive. Steven Jones promotes the “alternate propaganda”:

    Yet, the coverup perpetrators use ridicule to keep the “REAL” version hidden…

    December 6, 2006 - Steven E Jones brainwashes the 9/11 “truth movement” into thinking the idea of directed energy weapons and no planes is “crazy disinfo”: “Of late, [Jim Fetzer] refers often to his association now with Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds. These two are noted for their no-planes-hit-the-Towers theories and for promoting the notion of ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers.”

    Jones is one of many in and around the “truth movement” associated with Los Alamos where Directed Energy Weapons are researched. See here to learn how the 9/11 attacks, the 9/11 cover up, and the 9/11 "truth movement" were orchestrated by people associated with directed energy weapons and the media. Jones also suppressed free energy research in ways that mirror his 9/11 coverup:

    9/11 Directed Energy Weapon / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline
    By CB_Brooklyn

    Timeline of Events Involving Steve Jones, Crockett Grabbe and Steve Koonin
    By Russ Gerst

    If no-planes/TV-Fakery were “crazy disinfo”, why didn’t the media use it to discredit the “truth movement”? Here’s a video of Dr Morgan Reynolds on FOX News:

    Certainly if no-planes/TV-Fakery were “crazy disinfo”, the media would have invited Dr Reynolds back. Why didn’t they?

    On top of that, why didn’t the media report Reynolds’ or Wood’s court cases, represented by Attorney Jerry Leaphart?

    Dr Morgan Reynolds, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that the Media broadcasted cartoons of an airplane hitting the South Tower.

    Docket No. 1:07-cv-04612-GBD
    Title: Dr. Morgan Reynolds ex rel. USA vs. Science Applications International Corp. et al.
    Venue: United States District Court, Southern District of New York
    Judge: George B. Daniels

    Dr Judy Wood, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that Directed Energy Weapons were a causal factor in the destruction of the World Trade Center.

    Docket No. 1:07-cv-03314-GBD
    Title: Dr. Judy Wood ex rel. USA vs. Applied Research Associates, Inc. et al.
    Venue: United States District Court, Southern District of New York
    Judge: George B. Daniels

    UPDATE!!! While composing this article the author became aware of the following:

    New York Times
    “For Engineer, a Cloud of Litigation After 9/11”
    By Jim Dwyer
    February 23, 2008

    The relevant quote is as follows (emphasis added):

    ”… one man has sued on behalf of the United States, claiming that Mr. Gilsanz is part of a vast conspiracy to cover up the truth about 9/11, including the “so-called building failures.” The lawsuit maintains that exotic weaponry actually destroyed the buildings, and that the airplanes were mass psychological trickery.”

    Wood and Reynolds have filed two separate lawsuits.

    No mention of Wood/Reynolds/Leaphart’s names in the Times article.


    Let us review…

    The media (i.e. MSNBC):
    promote the “official” version as “the truth”
    ridicule the “alternate” version as the “offensive wacky conspiracy theory”
    shun the “REAL” version and court cases

    Plants in the ”truth movement” (i.e. Steven Jones):
    promote the “alternate” version as “the truth”
    ridicule the “REAL” version as “offensive wacky conspiracy theory”

    We can now understand why many “truthers” shy away from no-planes/TV-Fakery. Seems the 9/11 coverup perps tricked the “truth movement” with a well orchestrated plan of deception! Will these theories really “damage” the “truth movement”, or has the movement merely been tricked into thinking so?

    Many “truthers” often wonder why the mainstream media hasn’t broken the “inside job” story yet. The reason is simple: The 9/11 perps have not been exposed. (Check the “Suppression Timeline” linked above.)

    Only after the real 9/11 perpetrators are widely exposed with the media break!

    Will “truthers” finally start promoting no-planes/TV-Fakery? If the “truth movement” can’t admit their mistakes, why should the average person? People will simply continue believing what they feel most comfortable with: the “boxcutter” story. They don’t care about the evidence. Why should they? After all, the “truth movement” doesn’t. Or do they???

    How many “truthers” have looked at the no-planes/TV-Fakery evidence lately… evidence that anyone can understand?

    Below you will find a ton of evidence. Look it through… you maybe surprised!


    Be sure to continue reading the article at the link below.

    Learn of the 1999 Washington Post article that details the military's hologram project.

    Learn of the NYPD official who said the South Tower strike "looked like an evil magician's trick".

    Learn that very few people reported seeing airplanes, and even fewer reported hearing them.

    Also, watch the ABC video of Peter Jennings. He knew the airplane video was fake. Note his nervousness and word fumbling when ABC played the clip back in slow motion.

    NOTE: Please don't make yourself look silly with a question like "what about the thousands of New Yorkers who saw planes?". That question is addressed in the full article at the link above.
  2. Are people not bored of all the f@cking conspiracy theories yet? It's been 7 years!!
  3. FFS not again
  4. Fugly

    Fugly LE DirtyBAT

    This site needs a fucking good clearout.

    Starting with the paranoid fuckwit cunt who initiated this thread.
  5. At last, someone other than Frenchperson is prepared to stand up for freedom of speech!!

    the truth is out there !!!

    I need to tell you about the secret bunker at Colerne...
    just a minute, someone is at the door.....
    >etc, etc
  6. You're boring and stupid CBB. No one is interested any more - especially in you're zero-point sh1te. Go and bore off.
  7. you're a gullible, stupid, boring cunt.
  8. C B,
    If you and all the other conspiracy theorists are SO sure of the overwhelming evidence, then do something with it and bring the Bush Administration down.
    If you are unable to do this , kindly Shut The Fcuk up about this tired topic
  9. You might find this some comfort.

    Please try and get some sleep.

    Attached Files:

  10. You people are weak fucks. You can't face the truth of 9/11, and instead spew crap like crybabies. Boo-hoo-hoo.
  11. Fugly

    Fugly LE DirtyBAT

    I hope you die soon.
  12. Boo-hoo-hoo. :oops: :oops: :oops:
  13. Apparently not.

    Some people can't deal with reality so they retreat into a world of make-believe.


    I'm not going to follow your links. I've read too many "conspiracy theory" websites that I'm not going to waste my time.

    Summarise. Post a synopsis.
    Or Fcuk off.

    OK, I lied, I skimmed it.

    Utter crap from start to finish, based on "common sense" that has no concept of what happens when you actually put things together at high speed.
  14. Hey you're the one posting in the NAAFI bar, if you're that intelligent, read the rules.

    (Yes they are rules and no they're not written by the lizard people)
  15. STOP IT!!!!!!!!!!

    will all you cnuts pack it in. let the fukin dog die.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.