Debunking the 9/11 *Anti-No-Plane-Theory* Myths by CB_Brooklyn (mirrored @ checktheevidence.com) From the moment people thought that planes crashed in the World Trade Center, the brainwashing had begun. The âofficialâ account of Boeing 767s striking the North and South Towers, at 400+MPH and 500+MPH respectively, became glued in peoplesâ minds as âfactâ because of the âtee-veeâ. Good olâ tee-vee. We all trust the media. Even in 1938, when Orson Welles directed a special Halloween radio broadcast of the novel âWar of the Worldsâ, millions of Americans believed Martians were invading earth. Everyone trusts the media! (As a side note, Iâd like to advertise a new article by Andrew Johnson: âMars Anomaliesâ) It should come to no surprise how the media affects peoplesâ minds and our culture, and the mediaâs reporting of 9/11 is no exception. The 9/11 coverup perpetrators had their deceptive propaganda well planned. With their total control over the media they successfully conditioned most into believing their â19 boxcutter-wielding Muslimsâ story. People were overwhelmed; their brains saturated with the propaganda. November 10, 2001 - George W Bush brainwashes the world into thinking the idea of âinside jobâ is crazy: âLet us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th; malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists, themselves, away from the guilty.â http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/11/20011110-3.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K5M0xtxQVQ But the propaganda didnât stop there. The coverup perps, the experts they are, knew some people would see through their âboxcutterâ deception, so they crafted an alternate propagandaâ¦ specifically targeting those already suspicious of the âofficialâ story. Lenin, the first Communist dictator after the takeover of Russia in 1917, is widely credited with the following quotation, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." http://www.realnews247.com/fascism_disguised_at_democracy.htm This alternate propaganda is promoted by government plants within the âtruth movementâ, along with its fabricated evidence (such as molten metal). Of course, the media carefully publicize this âevidenceâ as a âwacky conspiracy theoryââ¦ November 14, 2005 - Tucker Carlson brainwashes the world into thinking the idea of an âinside jobâ theory is offensive. Steven Jones promotes the âalternate propagandaâ: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10053445 Yet, the coverup perpetrators use ridicule to keep the âREALâ version hiddenâ¦ December 6, 2006 - Steven E Jones brainwashes the 9/11 âtruth movementâ into thinking the idea of directed energy weapons and no planes is âcrazy disinfoâ: âOf late, [Jim Fetzer] refers often to his association now with Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds. These two are noted for their no-planes-hit-the-Towers theories and for promoting the notion of ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers.â http://judicial-inc.biz/Steven_Jones_quits_911.htm Jones is one of many in and around the âtruth movementâ associated with Los Alamos where Directed Energy Weapons are researched. See here to learn how the 9/11 attacks, the 9/11 cover up, and the 9/11 "truth movement" were orchestrated by people associated with directed energy weapons and the media. Jones also suppressed free energy research in ways that mirror his 9/11 coverup: 9/11 Directed Energy Weapon / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline By CB_Brooklyn http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=151&Itemid=60 Timeline of Events Involving Steve Jones, Crockett Grabbe and Steve Koonin By Russ Gerst http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=162&Itemid=60 If no-planes/TV-Fakery were âcrazy disinfoâ, why didnât the media use it to discredit the âtruth movementâ? Hereâs a video of Dr Morgan Reynolds on FOX News: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reQZT9Hzvt8 Certainly if no-planes/TV-Fakery were âcrazy disinfoâ, the media would have invited Dr Reynolds back. Why didnât they? On top of that, why didnât the media report Reynoldsâ or Woodâs court cases, represented by Attorney Jerry Leaphart? Dr Morgan Reynolds, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that the Media broadcasted cartoons of an airplane hitting the South Tower. http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=federal_case Docket No. 1:07-cv-04612-GBD Title: Dr. Morgan Reynolds ex rel. USA vs. Science Applications International Corp. et al. Venue: United States District Court, Southern District of New York Judge: George B. Daniels Dr Judy Wood, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that Directed Energy Weapons were a causal factor in the destruction of the World Trade Center. http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html Docket No. 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Title: Dr. Judy Wood ex rel. USA vs. Applied Research Associates, Inc. et al. Venue: United States District Court, Southern District of New York Judge: George B. Daniels ================================================= UPDATE!!! While composing this article the author became aware of the following: New York Times âFor Engineer, a Cloud of Litigation After 9/11â By Jim Dwyer February 23, 2008 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/23/nyregion/23about.htm The relevant quote is as follows (emphasis added): ââ¦ one man has sued on behalf of the United States, claiming that Mr. Gilsanz is part of a vast conspiracy to cover up the truth about 9/11, including the âso-called building failures.â The lawsuit maintains that exotic weaponry actually destroyed the buildings, and that the airplanes were mass psychological trickery.â Wood and Reynolds have filed two separate lawsuits. No mention of Wood/Reynolds/Leaphartâs names in the Times article. ================================================= Let us reviewâ¦ The media (i.e. MSNBC): promote the âofficialâ version as âthe truthâ ridicule the âalternateâ version as the âoffensive wacky conspiracy theoryâ shun the âREALâ version and court cases Plants in the âtruth movementâ (i.e. Steven Jones): promote the âalternateâ version as âthe truthâ ridicule the âREALâ version as âoffensive wacky conspiracy theoryâ We can now understand why many âtruthersâ shy away from no-planes/TV-Fakery. Seems the 9/11 coverup perps tricked the âtruth movementâ with a well orchestrated plan of deception! Will these theories really âdamageâ the âtruth movementâ, or has the movement merely been tricked into thinking so? Many âtruthersâ often wonder why the mainstream media hasnât broken the âinside jobâ story yet. The reason is simple: The 9/11 perps have not been exposed. (Check the âSuppression Timelineâ linked above.) Only after the real 9/11 perpetrators are widely exposed with the media break! Will âtruthersâ finally start promoting no-planes/TV-Fakery? If the âtruth movementâ canât admit their mistakes, why should the average person? People will simply continue believing what they feel most comfortable with: the âboxcutterâ story. They donât care about the evidence. Why should they? After all, the âtruth movementâ doesnât. Or do they??? How many âtruthersâ have looked at the no-planes/TV-Fakery evidence latelyâ¦ evidence that anyone can understand? Below you will find a ton of evidence. Look it throughâ¦ you maybe surprised! ====================================================== ====================================================== ====================================================== Be sure to continue reading the article at the link below. Learn of the 1999 Washington Post article that details the military's hologram project. Learn of the NYPD official who said the South Tower strike "looked like an evil magician's trick". Learn that very few people reported seeing airplanes, and even fewer reported hearing them. Also, watch the ABC video of Peter Jennings. He knew the airplane video was fake. Note his nervousness and word fumbling when ABC played the clip back in slow motion. http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=163&Itemid=60 NOTE: Please don't make yourself look silly with a question like "what about the thousands of New Yorkers who saw planes?". That question is addressed in the full article at the link above.