• This is a stand-to for an incoming competition, one of our most expensive yet.
    Later this week we're going to be offering the opportunity to Win £270 Rab Neutrino Pro military down jacket
    Visit the thread at that link above and Watch it to be notified as soon as the competition goes live

Death Proof

#1
Watched Tarantino's latest film last night and must say it was utter shite! I have long admired his flicks and, like many, rate Pulp Fiction as one of the best films of all time but DP was pants. There was no doubting that visually it was clever and the dialogue was superb but the story line/plot was about as watertight as Clarkson's Rover! I had soon resigned myself to the fact that this was going to be a long film (it seemed, after a couple of hours, to be finally picking up pace) when it facking ended!!!!

The most perplexing thing about it though is what warranted the 18 certificate?
 
#2
Sangreal said:
The most perplexing thing about it though is what warranted the 18 certificate?
you mean apart from all the gratuitous graphic violence? (that car crash?)

i thought it was a laugh.
 
#3
DrStealth said:
Sangreal said:
The most perplexing thing about it though is what warranted the 18 certificate?
you mean apart from all the gratuitous graphic violence? (that car crash?)

i thought it was a laugh.
But that was about a 30s sequence in a 2 hour film!
 

Mr Happy

LE
Moderator
#4
18 certs are required, because otherwise, the audience is too cool to watch it.

It was a p-poor movie, which whilst having some very good verbal interaction was full of nothing action and frankly, 2 hours of this is mildly more interesting than stagging on at Colchester ranges. But only just.
 
#5
I liked it! but then again I think it had a bit of girl empowerment twist to it....especially when she brings her boot heel down on his face! nice!

Remember it was originally meant to be two films, but apart from the gratuitous violence...(excellent!) even I thought it dragged a bit!
 

cpunk

LE
Moderator
#8
I thought it was like watching paint dry. The big problem for me is that the whole tedious set-up with the girls talking about their weekend and drinking in the bar is entirely irrelevant to what happens next. They just wipe out. The second half is better in that respect in that we establish that Zoe Bell and co are actually fairly tough cookies and probably better at what they do than 'Stuntman Mike' but Tarantino could have established that with about 2 minutes of dialogue. I'm told that Tarantino is big on the nasally introduced stimulants which may explain why he thought it was so great and nobody else does but there we go. Planet Terror is much, much better but ultimately still pretty forgettable.
 
#9
I watched Planet Terror and thought it was utter garbage. Apart from the fact that Rose Mcgowan was nice to look at until she started hobbling along with her machine gun leg. It was def tongue in cheek and utterly beyaond belief. If Death Proof is of the same ilk, I wouldn't bother, total cack.
 

Mr Happy

LE
Moderator
#10
cpunk said:
I thought it was like watching paint dry. The big problem for me is that the whole tedious set-up with the girls talking about their weekend and drinking in the bar is entirely irrelevant to what happens next. They just wipe out. The second half is better in that respect in that we establish that Zoe Bell and co are actually fairly tough cookies and probably better at what they do than 'Stuntman Mike' but Tarantino could have established that with about 2 minutes of dialogue. I'm told that Tarantino is big on the nasally introduced stimulants which may explain why he thought it was so great and nobody else does but there we go. Planet Terror is much, much better but ultimately still pretty forgettable.
Quite. Its his familiar characterisation party trick with lots of irrelevence and people being real people (the constant texting on the mobile particularly!) rather like the start of Pulp when Sam L Jackson and John Travolta are driving along. But it goes on too long, and has nothing to do with the movie, plot or events. Its simply fleshes out the characters (very well) before killing them all in one car crash. Sorry for the spoiler, but trust me, you'll thank me rather than seeing it.

The only way that Mr T could be proud of this movie is when he looks at the "cost of investment vs profit" ratio. The movie can't have been expensive and I imagine plenty of people would have ignored the professional reviewers comments assuming that "they just didn't get it - Tarantino is on a different level to them". They reality is its a gash movie.
 

Similar threads

Latest Threads

Top