Cyber Defence on the cheap

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by A2_Matelot, Sep 29, 2013.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. A2_Matelot

    A2_Matelot LE Book Reviewer

    From the BBC:

    "Defence Secretary Philip Hammond, who will address the conference on Sunday, appealed for IT experts to join up as military reservists to help protect the UK's computer networks from cyber attack".

    This isn't necessarily a dig at LIAG or Reserve forces but what are the buffoons in MoD thinking. To my mind this just sends some mixed and bad messages .

    Firstly how about MoD addresses the regular component first. We as yet haven't even got an agreed definition of cyber and its boundaries which gives you some idea of how slow off the mark we are. We have an entirely random and haphazard means of staffing, educating and training the regulars sent to our current defence unit. Most of which stems from single service issues and a failure to identify the aptitude, skills and experience needed. We then train these people quite extensively and at great expense and subsequently the single services return them to utterly mundane duties hence they grow dissatisfied.

    Lets be grown up, define the skills, create a career path, address renumeration and retention properly. Maybe its time to consider ICT specialists akin to spec aircrew, paid more but rank limited. If the capability is so critical to Defence and the wider UK why look to the Reserves?

    I really don't see why there is this push to bolster Reserve elements, accepting some individuals will have skills and experience in this area, let them bolster regular units. It is incredibly unlikely in their civilian guise they will have had accessto the tooling and intelligence that the regulars do. They stand to gain more not the other way around.
    • Like Like x 1
  2. Got that off your chest then shipmate?!
  3. A2_Matelot

    A2_Matelot LE Book Reviewer

    No, not yet ;-)
  4. [​IMG] Reply With Quote
    Doubt MOD could afford to retain a significant number of top flight IT specialists to have them square-bashing (or virtual equivalent) five days out of seven... Even two days out of seven. Even in civvy street a lot of the best guys are contractors.
  5. A2_Matelot

    A2_Matelot LE Book Reviewer

    I'm not so sure. Quite a lot of people I've spoken to have left specialist units and gone back to mainstream units and become bored and unenthused. PVR soon becomes an option. Their civilian salaries aren't football player level. I suggest if we paid them some form if specialist pay and kept them in the specialist units we could retain them and increase the pool internally. They could have a decent career path internally and with op tours and exchange posts to NATO/5E nations.

    We're not talking thousands of people.
  6. Isn't protection from cyber attack within the remit of the Intelligence service?

    Cyber being the ability of an outsider to gain access too and control critical systems.

    If the risks are as great as they are being made out to be then there needs to be a whole department monitoring things 24/7 with some of the best brains in the business.

    This is not the business of the reserve.
    • Like Like x 1
  7. By going to the TA you have the opportunity to employ people already being paid very well for the required skill set. I would suggest that anyone serving in the regular forces with the required skill set isn't going to be around long.

    Posted from the ARRSE Mobile app (iOS or Android)
  8. A2_Matelot

    A2_Matelot LE Book Reviewer

    Read my subsequent posts. It doesn't have to be that way and from what we've seen bar a few niche companies, cyber ninjas in industry are as scarce as they are in the forces.
  9. SPIDER38

    SPIDER38 On ROPs

    I was reading about the US spy Warrant Officer John Antony Walker he spied for 25 year's,he started of by going to the Soviet Embassy in Washington DC and giving them a cipher card for several thousand dollars then it increased to him telling the Soviets that the US subs knew exactly where the soviet subs were by the sound of the propellers,the soviets then re-shamfered these propellers and the US from the on lost complete track of them he was also suspected in a US ship being captured by the North Koreans and in the disapearance of the USS Scorpian this sub is said to have been torpedoed by the soviet's on the imformation he is alledged that the Soviet's knew the exact location of all US submarine patches in the North Atlantic from him,they also say that if a war broke out the soviets would have been able to destroy US subs at will,he and his ring supplied an estimated one million piece's of intelligence to the soviets.....all this was done for one reason financial gain,so let's hope that the people we are employing are vetted correctly and payed accordingly....

  10. MOD's IT strategy is simply ****ing clueless. Their idea of suitable salaries for the right people has the competent people bursting out laughing.

    Yes Graduate in IT, we can start you on £26k! And you get a pension but no career prospects!
    Uh, no thanks, I just got head hunted by a Yank outfit and got offered twice that as a start, fast track career path, great pension, and lots of opportunities for travel.

    And FWIW, the chappie they offered that sterling £26k package to was already a TA Lt. Now? He's head of systems for a very well known US defence outfit and spends a lot of time in that big five sided building on the Potomac.

    The MOD, trying to catch IT sharks with breadcrumbs.
  11. Let's us a little perspective here. The majority of the works is watching a network monitor screen and chimps can be trained to do that.

    Posted from the ARRSE Mobile app (iOS or Android)
    • Like Like x 1
  12. Nuclear submariner tried to pass secrets to Russians to 'hurt' Royal Navy - Telegraph

    Not that they'd get very far if they did try and betray us in this day and age...
  13. Yes, you can rely on chimps watching network monitors, or, you can do like the grown ups at this lark do.
    Employ geeks with brains the size of small planets, but poor personal hygiene and limited inter-personal skills with girlees.
    Stick them in a room away from normal people with the best IT money can buy and they will have the time of their lives playing a super geek game of hack the hacker. Problem is, they don't fit into the MOD hierarchy and need close supervising by talented managers with equally good IT skills.
    • Like Like x 5
  14. I suppose you could be looking for a bite, but then again maybe not.

    The complexity of cyber defence is way beyond a couple of speccie geeks sitting around in their mum's cellar surrounded by pizza boxes and empty Red Bull cans. The reality is nothing like the movies where Jeff Goldblum slips a malformed DOS file into an enemy's disk drive and bring down his whole force. It is very very serious and it is happening to you now. Right now!

    Frankly I find the way Hammond is portraying this is ridiculous. What the f*** does he think is involved? Does he believe this is akin to the 1916 RFC where a few jolly chaps, with a penchant for this kind of thing, fire up their rusty old crates and give the hun a good seeing-to? I accept that he probably doesn't actually understand the strategy, but even if he did he couldn't really outline it in public media outlets. Fair enough! But to portray it as something like Dad's Army is FU beyond all belief.

    Not taking cyber seriously is like a football team that plans to win by scoring more goals than their opposition, so does not bother fielding any defenders or a goalkeeper. Or, an infantry commander who plans his patrol routine but doesn't even consider possible enemy activity while doing so.

    Grrrr, rant, foam, etc.

    Edited to add: I made the mistake of reading what was in the press before the actual press release. Apologies to Hammond. He didn't make it sound pathetic, the media did.
    • Like Like x 2
  15. The NSA budget is around $10 Billion. That's a lot of bananas.

    If the UK wishes to play against the big boys like the PLA GhostNet, I venture to suggest it will require something rather more expensive than a Reserve unit of trained chimps. :roll: