Army Rumour Service

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Cross Channel Migrant Issue

  • Thread starter Deleted 3147
  • Start date
I'm sorry but that's simply idiotic. Google the number of military, coastguard and NGO vessels that took part in Op Sophia and the related Ops.

Are you seriously suggesting that in the face of waves of migrants being put to sea in some incredibly dangerous craft/situations we should have stepped back because it might have encouraged some people?

I'm staggered.
Well thank you for that confirmation . . . . I am not at all surprised that you are "staggered" at the suggestion, that idiots embarking upon a benign/dangerous sea-crossing, should be responsible for their own actions !!

Such a naive, simple, distorted attitude, clearly influences the content of your posts.

Maybe if you stepped outside of the "bubble" (of life-time employment ?!), that seems to have formed your opinion and attitudes . . . you might then gain an appreciation (if not quite an understanding/acceptance), of the frustration of others, who ARE "able to see the wood for the trees".

 
Well thank you for that confirmation . . . . I am not at all surprised that you are "staggered" at the suggestion, that idiots embarking upon a benign/dangerous sea-crossing, should be responsible for their own actions !!

Such a naive, simple, distorted attitude, clearly influences the content of your posts.

Maybe if you stepped outside of the "bubble" (of life-time employment ?!), that seems to have formed your opinion and attitudes . . . you might then gain an appreciation (if not quite an understanding/acceptance), of the frustration of others, who ARE "able to see the wood for the trees".
Are you the only one (apart from @Flight, obviously) who can see the big picture and thus can marvel at the stupidity of others?
 
And why - exactly - is that important ?!

in the grand scheme, of things, not terribly, after all, we’re not going to see HMS Greything cruising through the Dover Straits, guns closed up, shooting up rubber boats full of refugees.
Its a civil matter, yes, HM armed forces can be asked to lend a hand, but it will remain a civil matter, not an offensive military operation, and more importantly, civil maritime law pertains - absolutely - thou shalt not kill civilians in distress, thou shalt rescue them or escort them to a place of safety.
 
What's interesting is that the only RN type who has proffered an opinion disagrees directly with the "I was a professional mariner, you know!" civvies who are, through their extensive experience of being at sea in anything other than a warship, are sharing with the rest of us their insight into something the vast majority of us (me and them included) haven't actually seen.
Can I suggest that it 'aint got nothing to do with "RN types", experience of the sea, maritime law, etc.. that is all merely the "red-herring" used by some to distract others :( .

When it comes down to it, it is about morals, fundamental beliefs, and the "law & order" that is the bedrock of our "western" civilisation . . . and that some of us committed ourselves to upholding, whilst in uniform, training to "shoot-to-kill" those(%) we understood were intent on destroying what we held dear (% by their actions throughout Eastern Europe, and elsewhere in the World)

Do you believe that what you earn/accomplish should be yours?! (Never mind the Biblical debate about spending a full day, or just a few hours toiling !!). Do you believe that what is yours, is yours to keep and protect?

Why should thousands of years' of history NOW be overturned, by some who believe we should welcome those WELL DOCUMENTED "aliens", who are intent on destroying our beliefs, behaviour, culture, religion, politics, democracy and society ?!
 
in the grand scheme, of things, not terribly, after all, we’re not going to see HMS Greything cruising through the Dover Straits, guns closed up, shooting up rubber boats full of refugees. If
Its a civil matter, yes, HM armed forces can be asked to lend a hand, but it will remain a civil matter, not an offensive military operation, and more importantly, civil maritime law pertains - absolutely - thou shalt not kill civilians in distress, thou shalt rescue them or escort them to a place of safety.
Yes, but not in the Alt-right world free of cucks, where Dixon of Dock Green walks the beat (armed of course), clipping cheeky kids around the ears and that mostly-guilty prisoners are routinely hanged for their crimes, convicted without the benefit of judges and lawyers and other people who have been to them universities. Where national service allows a fleet of destroyers to be crewed to sail up and down the ENGLISH channel, machine gunning brown people. Where gays are convicted of their love of other men and women stay at home to cook wonderful meals of boiled brisket for their menfolk who do 'proper' jobs downth' pit. And we all drive ENGLISH rust bucket cars.... ad nauseum
 
Last edited:
I’m afraid some people are going to be very disappointed.....

the mood music is some sort of quid pro quo will be done with the French.

UK will take in family groups and minors that make the crossing,
single unaccompanied adults will be sent back to France.

both sides can declare a win.
 

endure

GCM
Yes, but not in the Alt-right world free of cucks, where Dixon of Dock Green walks the beat (armed of course), clipping cheeky kids around the ears and that mostly-guilty prisoners are routinely hanged for their crimes, convisted without the benefit of udges and lawyers and other people who have been to them universities. Where national service allows a fleet of destroyers to be crewed to sail up and down the ENGLISH channel, machine gunning brown people. Where gays are convicted of their love of other men and women stay at home to cook wonderful meals of boiled brisket for their menfolk who do 'proper' jobs downth' pit. And we all drive ENGLISH rust bucket cars.... ad nauseum


Time to admit defeat. The enemy have just rolled out the CAPITAL LETTERS, the ITALICS and the COLOURED FONTS...
 

Polyester

War Hero
@Flight

  • You have yet to provide the evidence that I support the illegal and irregular migration across the Channel.
  • You have yet to account for your reverse bearing on your allegegations that the RN leadership is weak.
  • You have yet to confirm your military experience, in spite of a number of normal and sane posters asking you to clarify this point (Hint: being in the cadets doesn't count).
  • You continue to use the rather silly, alt-right US term 'cuck' in increasingly abusive posts, bearing in mind this is CA.
  • You accuse all and sundry to be co-conspirators in some vast scheme to overrun Great Britain with illegal migrants, yet you are unable to provide a shred of evidence of this alleged endemic corruption.
  • You are either a sock or a bear of very little brain. Or both. Or a RUSBOT
Don’t waste your time with it. I don’t personally have anyone on ignore but I suspect many poster have Flight on ignore. If you note, after any posts he makes he is rarely replied too.

If he is a real human then I suspect him to lack military service and probably possesses a pony tail.
 

Yokel

LE
Can I suggest that it 'aint got nothing to do with "RN types", experience of the sea, maritime law, etc.. that is all merely the "red-herring" used by some to distract others :( .

When it comes down to it, it is about morals, fundamental beliefs, and the "law & order" that is the bedrock of our "western" civilisation . . . and that some of us committed ourselves to upholding, whilst in uniform, training to "shoot-to-kill" those(%) we understood were intent on destroying what we held dear (% by their actions throughout Eastern Europe, and elsewhere in the World)

Do you believe that what you earn/accomplish should be yours?! (Never mind the Biblical debate about spending a full day, or just a few hours toiling !!). Do you believe that what is yours, is yours to keep and protect?

Why should thousands of years' of history NOW be overturned, by some who believe we should welcome those WELL DOCUMENTED "aliens", who are intent on destroying our beliefs, behaviour, culture, religion, politics, democracy and society ?!

Some equally are concerned that some seem to want to protect the West by destroying Western values such as the rule of law, or concept of all people having worth, or compassion.

Nobody has been able to say what percentage of illegal immigration is represented by those coming in boats? Pareto analysis will dictate that Border Forces resources are concentrated on the most common methods.

The idea that people should be left to drown is simply incompatible with Western values.
 

Themanwho

LE
Book Reviewer
Some equally are concerned that some seem to want to protect the West by destroying Western values such as the rule of law, or concept of all people having worth, or compassion.

Nobody has been able to say what percentage of illegal immigration is represented by those coming in boats? Pareto analysis will dictate that Border Forces resources are concentrated on the most common methods.

The idea that people should be left to drown is simply incompatible with Western values.
Pretty sure that there some who will appreciate and be grateful for your attitude . . . which they would probably regard as those of "a useful idiot" :( .
 

NSP

LE
Why thank you Sir. And we all know what sits directly behind a pony tail....
Fresh air...?

Presumably you meant directly ahead of a pony tail...?

;)
 

Latest Threads

Top