Cross Channel Migrant Issue

  • Thread starter Deleted 3147
  • Start date
Cuck logic is hilarious...

You advocate and possibly profit from black people paying their life savings to take hazardous journeys in ill equipped boats, and say that anyone who opposes this modern slavery is advocating breaking the law?

Give your head a wobble.
For once you didn't mention the 'socialist' BBC in your rant. But full marks for using 'cuck'.

Please show where I advocate 'black people paying their life savings' and 'say[ing] that anyone who opposes this modern slavery is advocating breaking the law.'

Please don't make stuff up about me, and please be civil.
 
The people smugglers here are the corrupt officials and civil servants who not only allow this trade, but facilitate it.

They've criminally conspired to create an industry, and no doubt many of them benefit from it financially too.

How many of Serco's £2.9 billion do you think it would have taken to grease the wheels?

Fundamentally the border force etc are given money and resources to protect our shores, in fact it has been used to encourage people smuggling at thousands of pounds per head.

Fire and prosecute those responsible. Both currently and historically.

The people of this country have a right to security.
There are property companies making a fortune out of Home Office and local authority contracts to house all these people .
It's been going on for years .
In the 90's it was Bosnians , Croats and the odd Serb , in the early 2000's Kurds and various Iraqis .
The Conservative government in 1996 had a white list of countries , ie , those where citizens were in real danger and applications would be heard
Blair's government got rid of it and we have had to let the entire world in .
 

Flight

LE
Book Reviewer
Rather hilariously if the people to be profitted from here in this modern slave trade were white Russians the cucks would be panicking, calling for airstrikes and predicting the apocalypse.

The only difference would be the colour of their skin.

There's a name for that....
 
For once you didn't mention the 'socialist' BBC in your rant. But full marks for using 'cuck'.

Please show where I advocate 'black people paying their life savings' and 'say[ing] that anyone who opposes this modern slavery is advocating breaking the law.'

Please don't make stuff up about me, and please be civil.
@Flight thanks for the funny. However, when are you going to withdraw your false statement where I allegedly advocated 'black people paying their life savings' and 'say[ing] that anyone who opposes this modern slavery is advocating breaking the law'?

Preferably now.
 

Cold_Collation

LE
Book Reviewer
I've mentioned many times before on here...

BBC showed pictures of maybe 50 women and children lined up looking sorrowful at, I think Bari. in the hangar.
Reality was - they waited until the 700 blokes were offloaded to the jetty and filmed to look as if it was all women and children.
Electric sockets on warships are not UK standard. Majority had smart phones and had chargers they stripped the wires and plugged directly into various outlets. This caused several alarm bells to ring in HQ1 etc, and also several fights to break out. Also a bit of stabbyness and rape (male).
They were not all Syrians either - mainly Somali/Afghan/Iraqi/Pakistani.

They also took serious offence to direction from female ship's company. To the degree that they started just using blokes to deal with them.

*My info is from a few oppos who were on there at the time. Whether they was bullshitting or not- I do not know.
I can't imagine it though - knowing them etc etc, and what they actually do. They did have a FB 'radio silence' during that period also. Was quite a while after they actually spoke about it.
On origins: A mate's mate (I know, but bear with me this is gen) lives and works in Dubai. He has over quite a period of time used the same barber's shop.

Until recently; he turned up to find his usual man had gone. Where? This way, having bought himself a Syrian passport as he'd heard that it would get him into Germany.

I'm struggling with the MSM narrative as to who these people are and where they're from. Having guys who are clearly the other side of 30 pretending to be 14 year-old schoolboys doesn't really help my cynicism.

Any stabbyness and male rape? Don't even make it through the processing sheds. Any adverse 'reaction' to women? Don't even make it through the processing shed. And so on.
 

endure

GCM
Because those in permanent power have made a multi billion pound industry out of it.

Serco is a listed company and won a £2.9 billion contract. I wonder who has shares in it?

Now I wouldn't go so far as to assume that some people on this thread might have.... Though it would considerably explain their attitude would it not?
You are on crack aren't you?
Cucks will cuck?
Wouldn't you be happier on Reddit?
 
England expects that every man will.... beg the French to help us....

No this merely a crisis of leadership.

If the border force and RN leadership is so weak that they can't perform their duty then there has to be consequences for that.

Now call me naive but I expect that their duty comes first. And their duty is to protect our shores.
You are either naïve or quite happy to put servicemen and women in the position of causing the deaths of non-combatants.

The leadership required is to sort the legal basis for automatic repatriation and implement it. Neither of which is in the gift of BF or RN leadership.
 

Cold_Collation

LE
Book Reviewer
The Conservative government in 1996 had a white list of countries , ie , those where citizens were in real danger and applications would be heard
Blair's government got rid of it and we have had to let the entire world in.
If that's so then it was all a part of making the country less white and increasing the potential Labour vote.
 
Not a Boffin said:

How they are returned is where we need the French. It is ultimately in their interests to co-operate, because as others point out, parts of Northern France are beginning to resemble refugee camps - and you can see it as far west as Ouistreham, where in the last three years there's been a very noticeable increase in migrant presence. As long as we accept the incomers, then its easier for the French to facilitate. As soon as we make it clear it's going to stop, they will have to do something - and its for their own benefit in the long run.
The trouble is, how?
As I posted on the EU thread.

Sort out the invasion from French soil or there will be absolutely, no f***ing fishing rights for France.
 
Well for all the gnashing and wailing of teeth, sure enough, the Media are doing their best to put a 'poor helpless migrants' spin on it.

What the vast majority of boats landing this week look like

31765426-8610893-image-a-19_1597043793919.jpg


31765428-8610893-image-a-18_1597043773493.jpg



But natch, you get the telephoto lens out and film the BF launch with baybees aboard

31711244-8609105-A_toddler_pictured_was_carried_to_safety_by_the_Border_Force_as_-a-4_15969838...jpg


31742170-0-A_mother_is_reunited_with_he_child_as_migrants_believed_to_have_-a-9_1597041260358.jpg
 
Last edited:

Cold_Collation

LE
Book Reviewer
Blair , or Campbell openly admitted it
Oh, I knew about the open-door policy - I just didn't know about binning the white list.

It was Jack Straw who wrote the 'We're sorry' article that appeared in the Telegraph.
Diane Abbott more recently stated that such a policy never existed.
 
As I posted on the EU thread.

Sort out the invasion from French soil or there will be absolutely, no f***ing fishing rights for France.
I thought a good way would be we start with X number of fishing licenses for France. For every dinghy full of illegals that makes it to UK waters France loses a license, permanently, never ever to be reinstated. Might sharpen a few minds in the French ministries.
 
Why can't we land them on a French beach, pretend they were in distress in French waters and we felt duty bound to assist

Then we'll have the French escorting them into our waters, and we're just doing the reverse
 
Because those in permanent power have made a multi billion pound industry out of it.

Serco is a listed company and won a £2.9 billion contract. I wonder who has shares in it?

Now I wouldn't go so far as to assume that some people on this thread might have.... Though it would considerably explain their attitude would it not?
FYI . . .

 
Because those in permanent power have made a multi billion pound industry out of it.

Serco is a listed company and won a £2.9 billion contract. I wonder who has shares in it?

Now I wouldn't go so far as to assume that some people on this thread might have.... Though it would considerably explain their attitude would it not?
Allegedly, here is one that SHOUTS out . . . .

Dame Sue Owen DCB
Independent Non-Executive Director


Appointed to the Board
August 2020
Skills and experience
Dame Sue has significant experience of government and economic policy, having held senior roles in several government departments.
She has a MA in economics from Cambridge University and an MSc in Economics from Cardiff University.
Previous roles
Permanent Secretary for
the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, Civil Service LGB&T (straight ally) Champion and overall Diversity and Inclusion Champion, chair of the Charity for Civil Servants and senior posts in the Department for Work and Pensions, Department for International Development, Foreign Office and HM Treasury.

1597061794420.png


 
Last edited:

Latest Threads

Top