And yet:
“There is no alternative conclusion other than that the Russian state was culpable for the attempted murder of Sergei Skripal and his daughter - and for threatening the lives of other British citizens.”
That was the conclusion Theresa May.
Why is the UK accusing Russia of a nerve agent attack on a Russian spy, and what is the evidence?
And as for an official story?
If you aren't aware then how can you logically push the company line?
'Briefing the UN Security Council on Wednesday, British ambassador Jonathan Allen said:
“Based on the knowledge that Russia has previously produced this agent and combined with Russia’s record of conducting state sponsored assassinations – including against former intelligence officers whom they regard as legitimate targets – the UK Government concluded that it was highly likely that Russia was responsible for this reckless act.”
That's the official line as to how/why the Russians are getting blamed.
No evidence provided, just speculation.
You call it speculation, others may call it an analyses of the known facts by, funnily enough, intelligence analysts and other agencies to arrive at the best conclusion given the available evidence and context.
Any event such as this becomes known to us initially from news reports given by journalists garnering information from a number of sources, and sometimes being witnesses themselves. This is added to by statements from the police, the ministries and others official sources as facts and evidence is gathered, weighed, analysed,, etc., etc.,
There will inevitably be anomalies and inconsistencies given all the disparate and several sources of information. Blimey, even witnesses to the event can give different versions of what they saw.
Not helped by the likes of Boris Johnson doing his usual buffoonery and overstating what he was told.
But you know all this anyway.
However, CTERs, and you give the impression of being one, seem to live in a world where they think that this is all pre-planned and there are evil agencies at work within the gubmint (how they love that word, (as well as the deep state, the powers that be, and ooer what about the Illuminati (gosh, there I said it and there'll be a knock on my door at dark o clock to drag me away)) or the gubmint themselves planning some false flag or whatever to pin the blame on others or to drive an agenda. And to do this they need an 'official story'.
And that because the intelligence services, police and others aren't opening up their files of an ongoing investigation and showing the evidence to all and sundry this is yet more proof of these evil machinations.
But no, we have the likes of 118 118 and CTERs who can see through all this. They pick apart these inconsistencies from the initial reports and worry little details to death to come to their breath taking ta dah expose of the evil hand of 'the man', TPTB, the gubmint, Bilderberg, Illumaniti, or whatever.
They think they're so superior to us mere mortals who just can't see and aren't enlightened to their ways.
Yeah right.
There is 'no official story' because it hasn't been written.
But you just keep waffling. It's quite amusing
Last edited: