Critically ill man 'former Russian spy'

Status
Not open for further replies.
There is a lot of native Russian speakers in BBC-Ruussian. This article
Юлия Скрипаль: я надеюсь однажды вернуться в Россию
presents full text of the statement in Russian. It also contains allegation made by Russian diplomats that initial statement was written in English and then translated in poor way to Russian.
Btw, BBC-Russian is not Russia 1 TV.
Remarkably no one Russian-speaking BBC journalist dare to make a comment (that the statement was made in perfect Russian). It is telling.
You continue to grasp at straws despite the exceedingly brave (imo) statement from Yulia. I have no idea how I would feel if I found out my country tried to kill me and my father. However, her bravery shines through. If only all Russian citizens held the strength she does.

Instead we get the promoters of what you call ‘crooks and thieves’.
 
There is a lot of native Russian speakers in BBC-Ruussian. This article
Юлия Скрипаль: я надеюсь однажды вернуться в Россию
presents full text of the statement in Russian. It also contains allegation made by Russian diplomats that initial statement was written in English and then translated in poor way to Russian.
Btw, BBC-Russian is not Russia 1 TV.
Remarkably no one Russian-speaking BBC journalist dare to make a comment (that the statement was made in perfect Russian). It is telling.
The reason no Russian speaking BBC journalists have commented is because the accusation is puerile & risible.
Go away & send in the KGB's who has charge of the collective brain. At least he's funny.
 
Stop telling lies for your ‘crooks and thives’. Putin said it wasn’t a military grade nerve agent. PD and OPCW say it was. Both you and he lie

Complete obfuscation from the promoter of ‘crooks and thieves’. Putin said it wasn’t a military grade nerve agent. PD and OPCW say it was. Both you and he lie
As I understand the apparent fact that the Skripals are not dead (at least ms.Skripal) proves that.
1. Insufficient amount of poison penetrated their bodies.
2. So insufficient amount of poison was used.
3. Insufficient amount means either
3a. Poorly planned or performed operation
3b. or imitation of usage of Novichok.
Mr. Putin in his statement meant (as I understand) variant 3b.
 
As I understand the apparent fact that the Skripals are not dead (at least ms.Skripal) proves that.
1. Insufficient amount of poison penetrated their bodies.
I thought you weren’t a chemist?
2. So insufficient amount of poison was used.
That depends on numerous factors. Pure speculation
3. Insufficient amount means either
3a. Poorly planned or performed operation
3b. or imitation of usage of Novichok.
Not according to OPCW
Mr. Putin in his statement meant (as I understand) variant 3b.
Then he lies much like you
 
As I understand the apparent fact that the Skripals are not dead (at least ms.Skripal) proves that.
1. Insufficient amount of poison penetrated their bodies.
2. So insufficient amount of poison was used.
3. Insufficient amount means either
3a. Poorly planned or performed operation
3b. or imitation of usage of Novichok.
Mr. Putin in his statement meant (as I understand) variant 3b.
No mention in your list of prompt & highly skilled medical intervention.

Both would have died without it.

But I guess you don't really care, as dead kids in eastern Ukraine didn't make you question Putin's actions, so why should a couple of dead Russians bother you in the slightest?
You're a propagandist for a mass murderer & as such bear a significant degree of culpability for the murderer Putin's actions.
 
Surprisingly enough you're ignoring all the variables including meteorology, amount physically transferred to victims, site and route of absorption, and speed and effectiveness of medical aid.
Properly planned operation should take into account these variables with any possible values.
I wrote about 2 alternatives.
A. The poisoning was not planned or/and performed properly
B. It was merely imitation of poisoning.
Do you have own version?
If not then what version from your point of view is more probable?
 
The whole thing was rehearsed and unnatural. The script careful to give nothing away... clearly a complete sham never seen before in any criminal case and evidence that there is much to hide. A press conference held in secrecy with Q&A is easy to arrange but no! They do not want anyone to hear her personal accounts leading up to the incident or to ask awkward questions. Questions that may help identify who, how and why. At least we are not in the dark any longer...that the Russians were involved can now be ruled out.
You ever recovered from a nerve agent attempt on your life? Of course it was fecking rehearsed, it was a statement. What did you want? "You missed last time, come and have another bash"?
 
SME was saying. Who is this 'SME' exactly.
No, Russian TV channels, reported about new claims made by Dutch investigators.
Pres.Putin made his comment and of course it was reported.
Remains of BUK missile with serial number were shown. They appeared out of the blue. They were never be mentioned previously. When, where, by whom they were recovered? It is not clear. Ukrainians could disassemble one of their missiles for this purpose. As for other claims then there are nothing new.
Btw, has British mass media reported about one interesting detail?
According to the serial number, the missile was produced in 1986. Its safe period of use is 15 years that could be extended for additional 5 or maximum 10 years. Russian MoD claims that all Russian BUK missiles produced in 1986 had been disassembled and utilized up to 2011.
Let's look at BBC
www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-44252150
No, the article doesn't contain arguments proposed by Moscow.
So namely British mass media hides important details.
Bang to rights. Stop embarrassing yourself.
 
I'm not a specialist in poisons.
By contrast mr.Putin has at hand a lot of high class specialists and in fact he retranslated their expert opinion.
Still British investigators haven't proposed more or less realistic scheme of poisoning.
How it had happened? It is still not clear.
Once again, I remind you of how competent your specialist were previously.

Moscow theatre siege: Questions remain unanswered
 
There is a lot of native Russian speakers in BBC-Ruussian. This article
Юлия Скрипаль: я надеюсь однажды вернуться в Россию
presents full text of the statement in Russian. It also contains allegation made by Russian diplomats that initial statement was written in English and then translated in poor way to Russian.
Btw, BBC-Russian is not Russia 1 TV.
Remarkably no one Russian-speaking BBC journalist dare to make a comment (that the statement was made in perfect Russian). It is telling.
It's a shame you have so few investigative journalists left alive isn't it?
 
In fact Porton Down confirmed Putin's statement.
Only traces of 'Novichok' were discovered, amount that was insufficient to kill the Skripals.
Thus 'Novichok' was not used as a lethal poison.
But 'Novichok' is military grade lethal poison and it kills if used in sufficient amount.
It means that if 'Novichok' was used properly then the Skripals would be dead.
In other words if 'Novichok' was used then the Skripals would be dead as mr.Putin said.
You really do talk utter b*llocks.
 
Properly planned operation should take into account these variables with any possible values.
I wrote about 2 alternatives.
A. The poisoning was not planned or/and performed properly
B. It was merely imitation of poisoning.
Do you have own version?
If not then what version from your point of view is more probable?
Perhaps the plan was to poison the door so the skripals go in, stay in and die quietly

Unfortunately they went out too soonand/or the weather affected it enabling them to go out

The effects came into force in a public place
They got aid and lived

That pesky father and daughter going out for a nice Sunday afternoon
 
Ukraine, MH 17, KAL 007, Chernobyl, The Kursk & so on are most certainly connected to the attempted murder of Skripal in that they demonstrate the Russian habit of lying when caught with its pants down.
You may call shooting down a couple of airliners full of innocent men, women & children naughty, anyone with common sense would call it state sponsored murder.
Presumably you will continue to not accept anything that doesn't suit your warped pro Russian agenda?

What are you, some kind of fcuking comedian?
And now proof (no matter how much you trolls twist the facts) from the Dutch investigators that Russia downed MH 17, even down to the unit involved. Of course Russia lies yet again that it wasn't responsible.
Would a country that was innocent really produce such obviously badly photo shopped satellite pictures to try to divert blame elsewhere? Of course not!

Russia caught with its pants round its ankles yet again. Putin must think everyone else is as stupid as he is.

Still waiting for you trolls to tell me who was responsible for the CW attack in Salisbury. Sorry to repeat the inconvenient question......

Although I expect that eventually proof will emerge that Russia did attempt to murder Skripal.
 
Having watched it, the so-called expert on chemical weapons is an idiot or speaking with forked tongue. The words ‘tracheostomy’ and ‘tracheotomy’ refer to exactly the same procedure. If he thinks they don’t then he genuinely doesn’t know what he’s talking about.
It is the usual lying by omission. He goes on to say that the procedure could be carried out due to a long term coma. What he doesn't say is all the other reasons it could be carried out ranging from nerve agent poisoning to anaphylactic shock and trauma. They appear to believe that the semi truths convince people . I think the only people they convince are those people who want to be convinced.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Posts

Latest Threads

Top