Covid Passports - Yay or ney?

Should we have have Covid passports?


  • Total voters
    282
If someone attends any social event or go to work whilst infected, they're will infect others. Working from home is probably far more effective to stopping the spread than your precious 2-3 days.
You’re moving the goalpost again. Your original contention was that both vaccinated and unvaccinated are equally likely to infect others. The fact that you feel you have to add extra elements, like WFH, into the discussion just illustrates you now realise that your argument is baseless.

When have I suggested vaccines are unnecessary ? invoking strawman arguments, is the classic sign you get what I'm saying but just don't want to acknowledge it and I will shut up for my own sanity and no longer comment.
I never suggested you did. i was referring to the behavioural science element that you introduced to try and deflect from your failing logic. This is all down to your inability to interpret my post. Probably because English is not your native language.
 
applied for what?
His vaccine passport one would assume.

I got my booster yesterday and my vaccination records are now on an App - so I will be eligible to keep visiting restaurants, bars and sports facilities etc. as vaccinations will be mandatory for these venues by the end of the month.

Will you be getting a special vaccination passport because you are are 'exempt' or will you be ineligible because your 'exempt status' is a huge fuck1ng lie?
 
His vaccine passport one would assume.

I got my booster yesterday and my vaccination records are now on an App - so I will be eligible to keep visiting restaurants, bars and sports facilities etc. as vaccinations will be mandatory for these venues by the end of the month.

Will you be getting a special vaccination passport because you are are 'exempt' or will you be ineligible because your 'exempt status' is a huge fuck1ng lie?

No, I won't be getting a special vaccination passport because I am 'exempt' from wearing a mask - because there is no legal requirement for anyone to show any documentation to indicate they are exempt from wearing a mask.

My 'exempt status' is not a lie, and I operate within the bounds of the law.
 
No, I won't be getting a special vaccination passport because I am 'exempt' from wearing a mask - because there is no legal requirement for anyone to show any documentation to indicate they are exempt from wearing a mask.

My 'exempt status' is not a lie, and I operate within the bounds of the law.
You are not exempt.

You think that you are special but you have no other reason for thinking that you are exempt.

You are a liar.
 
You are not exempt.

You think that you are special but you have no other reason for thinking that you are exempt.

You are a liar.
I am exempt.

I do not think that I am special and I have no requirement to give a reason stating why I am exempt.

You are a liar.
 
Why are you 'exempt'?

Because I have a valid reason not to wear a mask, this includes (but is not limited to):
  • children under the age of 11 (The UK Health Security Agency does not recommend face coverings for children under the age of 3 for health and safety reasons)
  • people who cannot put on, wear or remove a face covering because of a physical or mental illness or impairment, or disability
  • people for whom putting on, wearing or removing a face covering will cause severe distress
  • people speaking to or providing assistance to someone who relies on lip reading, clear sound or facial expressions to communicate
  • to avoid the risk of harm or injury to yourself or others
  • police officers and other emergency workers, given that this may interfere with their ability to serve the public

 
Because I have a valid reason not to wear a mask, this includes (but is not limited to):
  • children under the age of 11 (The UK Health Security Agency does not recommend face coverings for children under the age of 3 for health and safety reasons)
  • people who cannot put on, wear or remove a face covering because of a physical or mental illness or impairment, or disability
  • people for whom putting on, wearing or removing a face covering will cause severe distress
  • people speaking to or providing assistance to someone who relies on lip reading, clear sound or facial expressions to communicate
  • to avoid the risk of harm or injury to yourself or others
  • police officers and other emergency workers, given that this may interfere with their ability to serve the public

Utter utter bollocks. Full on nonsense. It might cause you 'distress'. Grow the feck up you self important prick.
 
Gaijin would make a good archetype case study for Jordan peterson and his interest in the fascists.
I would certainly have the scientifically illiterate rounded up, along with conspiracy theorists, socialist workers, child molesters, radical feminists and general mongs. And that chap who does Mrs Brown's Boys.
 
I would certainly have the scientifically illiterate rounded up, along with conspiracy theorists, socialist workers, child molesters, radical feminists and general mongs. And that chap who does Mrs Brown's Boys.
Finally - we agree on something :)
 
I would certainly have the scientifically illiterate rounded up, along with conspiracy theorists, socialist workers, child molesters, radical feminists and general mongs. And that chap who does Mrs Brown's Boys.
You do grasp that science is never settled and usually have multiple theories co-existing at any one time. So your simply arguing the science accepted by government should always be accepted by everyone without any thought. Once science suggested all kinds of naughty things that appealed to the nazis and you do make comfortable bed fellows with them.
 
You do grasp that science is never settled and usually have multiple theories co-existing at any one time. So your simply arguing the science accepted by government should always be accepted by everyone without any thought. Once science suggested all kinds of naughty things that appealed to the nazis and you do make comfortable bed fellows with them.
Gaijin's post didn't make any comment about science being settled or not, his comment was about the "scientifically illiterate". Those who are not scientifically illiterate accept that a core aspect of science is the proposal and defence of theories on one hand, and (educated) critique on the other.
It's often rather easy to determine who is scientifically illiterate, as they describe videos from youtube (and other platforms) as "research". They also generally describe the process that you describe as a "changing narrative".
 
You do grasp that science is never settled and usually have multiple theories co-existing at any one time. So your simply arguing the science accepted by government should always be accepted by everyone without any thought. Once science suggested all kinds of naughty things that appealed to the nazis and you do make comfortable bed fellows with them.

The only thing that refutes science is better science. As things stand the science that we have is the best, and most accurate, available. I will far, far, more readily accept the current findings than that of a bunch of egotistic twats who think that 'their own research' on social media is somehow a plausible alternative. It isn't, and anyone who conducts their 'own research' (or thinks that they are 'exempt' @RoyalGreenJacket ) in that, or any similar, fashion is a fuck1ng moron.
 
Last edited:
The only thing that refutes science is better science. As things stand the science that we have is the best, and most accurate, available. I will far, far, more readily accept the current findings than a bunch of egotistic twats who think that 'their own research' social media is somehow a plausible alternative. It isn't, and anyone who conducts their 'own research' in that, or any similar, fashion is a fuck1ng moron.
Of course, that wasn't really the thrust of Emcon's post. He just wanted to call you a nazi again, so he used his tried and tested approach of attributing a statement to you that didn't make, so that he could draw a conclusion and make the "big statement" that he wanted to make.

It won't be the last time he uses this trick, and I am sure he'll be back with some garbled English, spiced with exotic punctuation and liberal use of the word "they're".
 
His vaccine passport one would assume.

I got my booster yesterday and my vaccination records are now on an App - so I will be eligible to keep visiting restaurants, bars and sports facilities etc. as vaccinations will be mandatory for these venues by the end of the month.

Will you be getting a special vaccination passport because you are are 'exempt' or will you be ineligible because your 'exempt status' is a huge fuck1ng lie?
Correct.
Arrived today, runs out by end of month and contains no more information than my credit card shows.
But before the Boris grr types get all excited it is NHS not HMG.
 

Latest Threads

Top